Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Right to Adequate Medical Treatment a Fundamental Right: Delhi High Court Granting Bail  on Medical Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court today underscored the fundamental right to adequate and effective medical treatment while granting interim bail to Hari Om Rai in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The judgment focused on interpreting Section 45 of the PMLA, particularly the proviso that allows bail for ‘sick’ persons. The Court balanced the strict conditions for bail under PMLA against the urgent medical needs of the accused.

Hari Om Rai, arrested on October 9, 2023, sought interim bail due to deteriorating health conditions, including heart and orthopedic issues, which were allegedly not adequately addressed in judicial custody. The defense argued for Rai’s fundamental right to medical treatment of his choice, while the prosecution maintained that his medical needs were being met in custody and did not warrant bail.

Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma thoroughly examined Rai’s medical records, acknowledging the aggravation of his health issues while in custody. The Court observed that the treatment required for Rai’s cardiac and orthopedic conditions was beyond the scope of the jail dispensary. Justice Sharma remarked, “The delicate balance between life and death in cardiac emergencies underscores the importance of prioritization and specialized care required in such cases.”

 

 

Granting interim bail for three months, the Court set forth several conditions, including a Rs.1,00,000 bond and stipulations against leaving the country, influencing witnesses, or tampering with evidence. This decision highlights the judiciary’s recognition of the right to health as integral to the right to life.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024.

Hari Om Rai vs Directorate of Enforcement,

Latest Legal News