Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Right to Adequate Medical Treatment a Fundamental Right: Delhi High Court Granting Bail  on Medical Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court today underscored the fundamental right to adequate and effective medical treatment while granting interim bail to Hari Om Rai in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The judgment focused on interpreting Section 45 of the PMLA, particularly the proviso that allows bail for ‘sick’ persons. The Court balanced the strict conditions for bail under PMLA against the urgent medical needs of the accused.

Hari Om Rai, arrested on October 9, 2023, sought interim bail due to deteriorating health conditions, including heart and orthopedic issues, which were allegedly not adequately addressed in judicial custody. The defense argued for Rai’s fundamental right to medical treatment of his choice, while the prosecution maintained that his medical needs were being met in custody and did not warrant bail.

Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma thoroughly examined Rai’s medical records, acknowledging the aggravation of his health issues while in custody. The Court observed that the treatment required for Rai’s cardiac and orthopedic conditions was beyond the scope of the jail dispensary. Justice Sharma remarked, “The delicate balance between life and death in cardiac emergencies underscores the importance of prioritization and specialized care required in such cases.”

 

 

Granting interim bail for three months, the Court set forth several conditions, including a Rs.1,00,000 bond and stipulations against leaving the country, influencing witnesses, or tampering with evidence. This decision highlights the judiciary’s recognition of the right to health as integral to the right to life.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024.

Hari Om Rai vs Directorate of Enforcement,

Latest Legal News