UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Right to Adequate Medical Treatment a Fundamental Right: Delhi High Court Granting Bail  on Medical Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court today underscored the fundamental right to adequate and effective medical treatment while granting interim bail to Hari Om Rai in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The judgment focused on interpreting Section 45 of the PMLA, particularly the proviso that allows bail for ‘sick’ persons. The Court balanced the strict conditions for bail under PMLA against the urgent medical needs of the accused.

Hari Om Rai, arrested on October 9, 2023, sought interim bail due to deteriorating health conditions, including heart and orthopedic issues, which were allegedly not adequately addressed in judicial custody. The defense argued for Rai’s fundamental right to medical treatment of his choice, while the prosecution maintained that his medical needs were being met in custody and did not warrant bail.

Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma thoroughly examined Rai’s medical records, acknowledging the aggravation of his health issues while in custody. The Court observed that the treatment required for Rai’s cardiac and orthopedic conditions was beyond the scope of the jail dispensary. Justice Sharma remarked, “The delicate balance between life and death in cardiac emergencies underscores the importance of prioritization and specialized care required in such cases.”

 

 

Granting interim bail for three months, the Court set forth several conditions, including a Rs.1,00,000 bond and stipulations against leaving the country, influencing witnesses, or tampering with evidence. This decision highlights the judiciary’s recognition of the right to health as integral to the right to life.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024.

Hari Om Rai vs Directorate of Enforcement,

Latest Legal News