Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Right to Adequate Medical Treatment a Fundamental Right: Delhi High Court Granting Bail  on Medical Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court today underscored the fundamental right to adequate and effective medical treatment while granting interim bail to Hari Om Rai in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The judgment focused on interpreting Section 45 of the PMLA, particularly the proviso that allows bail for ‘sick’ persons. The Court balanced the strict conditions for bail under PMLA against the urgent medical needs of the accused.

Hari Om Rai, arrested on October 9, 2023, sought interim bail due to deteriorating health conditions, including heart and orthopedic issues, which were allegedly not adequately addressed in judicial custody. The defense argued for Rai’s fundamental right to medical treatment of his choice, while the prosecution maintained that his medical needs were being met in custody and did not warrant bail.

Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma thoroughly examined Rai’s medical records, acknowledging the aggravation of his health issues while in custody. The Court observed that the treatment required for Rai’s cardiac and orthopedic conditions was beyond the scope of the jail dispensary. Justice Sharma remarked, “The delicate balance between life and death in cardiac emergencies underscores the importance of prioritization and specialized care required in such cases.”

 

 

Granting interim bail for three months, the Court set forth several conditions, including a Rs.1,00,000 bond and stipulations against leaving the country, influencing witnesses, or tampering with evidence. This decision highlights the judiciary’s recognition of the right to health as integral to the right to life.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024.

Hari Om Rai vs Directorate of Enforcement,

Latest Legal News