Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Results of the Petitioner Shall Be Kept in a Sealed Cover Till the Next Date of Hearin: Supreme Court Directs UPSC Amidst EWS Reservation Controversy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India issued an interim order in a high-stakes case involving a petitioner's exclusion from the personality test of the Engineering Services Examination (ESE) conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). The Court has directed the UPSC to "convey a date for the petitioner to appear for the personality test," adding that "the results of the petitioner shall be kept in a sealed cover till the next date of hearing."

Surendra Kumar Choubey, the petitioner, approached the apex court under Article 32 of the Constitution, challenging UPSC's decision to exclude him from the personality test due to discrepancies in the submission of his Income and Asset Certificates for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) reservation.

The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that he had duly submitted an online Income and Asset Certificate before the application's cutoff date. However, UPSC declined to include him in the personality test for the reason that the submitted certificates were "after the closing date of online application for ESE2023

 Date of Decision: 17-10-2023

SURENDRA KUMAR CHOUBEY  VS UPSC & ORS. 

                                   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/17_October_2023-Surendra_Kumar_Choubey_vs_Upsc.pdf"]

Latest Legal News