Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Successive FIRs Cannot Be Used to Thwart Bail: Supreme Court Invokes Article 32 to Protect Personal Liberty Supreme Court Enforces Contractual Bar Against Interest in Government Contracts Ex Parte Decree Not a Blank Cheque - Merely Because Defendant Absent, Plaintiff’s Case Not Presumed True: Madras High Court Mandatory Injunction Cannot Be Kept in Cold Storage: Supreme Court Enforces Strict Three-Year Limitation for Execution Senior Citizens Act Is for Maintenance, Not a Shortcut to Eviction: Calcutta High Court Restrains Tribunal’s Overreach Statement ‘Counsel Says’ Is Not a Binding Undertaking Without Client’s Specific Authorization: Allahabad High Court Declines to Initiate Contempt Rigours of Section 43-D(5) Melt Down When Liberty Is at Stake: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail in UAPA Case After 2.5 Years’ Custody Vakalatnama Is Not a Mere Form – Attestation Is a Legal Safeguard: Andhra Pradesh High Court Cautions Advocates and Registry on Procedural Sanctity Right to Be Considered for Promotion Is Fundamental – Employer’s Unfairness Cannot Defeat It: : Gujarat High Court Panchayat Statement Implicating Others Is Not a Confession Proper: J&K High Court Rejects Extra-Judicial Confession in Murder Appeal Contempt Lies Only on ‘Wilful and Deliberate Disobedience’ – Fresh KASP Appointments Not Replacement of Daily Wage Workers: Kerala High Court 498A Cannot Become a Dragnet for Entire Family: Orissa High Court Shields Distant In-Laws but Sends Husband to Trial

Results of the Petitioner Shall Be Kept in a Sealed Cover Till the Next Date of Hearin: Supreme Court Directs UPSC Amidst EWS Reservation Controversy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India issued an interim order in a high-stakes case involving a petitioner's exclusion from the personality test of the Engineering Services Examination (ESE) conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). The Court has directed the UPSC to "convey a date for the petitioner to appear for the personality test," adding that "the results of the petitioner shall be kept in a sealed cover till the next date of hearing."

Surendra Kumar Choubey, the petitioner, approached the apex court under Article 32 of the Constitution, challenging UPSC's decision to exclude him from the personality test due to discrepancies in the submission of his Income and Asset Certificates for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) reservation.

The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that he had duly submitted an online Income and Asset Certificate before the application's cutoff date. However, UPSC declined to include him in the personality test for the reason that the submitted certificates were "after the closing date of online application for ESE2023

 Date of Decision: 17-10-2023

SURENDRA KUMAR CHOUBEY  VS UPSC & ORS. 

                                   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/17_October_2023-Surendra_Kumar_Choubey_vs_Upsc.pdf"]

Latest Legal News