District Judiciary Retirement Age | Supreme Court Directs Enhancement To 62 Years To Arrest Attrition Of Judicial Talent Slogans Inciting Armed Rebellion Or Challenging Sovereignty Cannot Be Equated With Religious Expressions: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail Revisional Authority Under AP ROR Act Has Jurisdiction To Direct Inquiry Into Illegal Transfers Of Assigned Land: Andhra Pradesh High Court Indian Law Does Not Recognise 'Joint Parenting' As A Statutory Concept; Child Welfare Remains Paramount: Bombay High Court Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Court Must Appoint Survey-Knowing Commissioner In Suits Alleging Physical Encroachment And Boundary Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 33-C(2) ID Act | Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Recover Consequential Benefits Arising From CAT Orders: Delhi High Court Order VIII Rule 1-A(3) CPC | Procedural Law Is Meant For Advancement Of Justice; Technicalities Should Not Scuttle Opportunity To Lead Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court Can Condition Condonation Of Delay In Land Acquisition Appeals Upon Waiver Of Interest For Delayed Period: Bombay High Court Employees Compensation Act | Insurance Company Not Liable To Indemnify Penalty Imposed On Employer Under Section 4-A(3)(b): Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees’ Compensation Act | Failure To Frame Issue On Employer-Employee Relationship Vitiates Commissioner’s Award: Kerala High Court Default Bail Under Section 187 BNSS | Period Of Investigation Depends On Substance Of Allegations In FIR, Not Merely Mentioned Sections: Madhya Pradesh High Court SARFAESI Act | Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Must Be Challenged Under Section 17 Before DRT, Not Via Writ Petition: Kerala High Court

Results of the Petitioner Shall Be Kept in a Sealed Cover Till the Next Date of Hearin: Supreme Court Directs UPSC Amidst EWS Reservation Controversy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India issued an interim order in a high-stakes case involving a petitioner's exclusion from the personality test of the Engineering Services Examination (ESE) conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). The Court has directed the UPSC to "convey a date for the petitioner to appear for the personality test," adding that "the results of the petitioner shall be kept in a sealed cover till the next date of hearing."

Surendra Kumar Choubey, the petitioner, approached the apex court under Article 32 of the Constitution, challenging UPSC's decision to exclude him from the personality test due to discrepancies in the submission of his Income and Asset Certificates for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) reservation.

The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that he had duly submitted an online Income and Asset Certificate before the application's cutoff date. However, UPSC declined to include him in the personality test for the reason that the submitted certificates were "after the closing date of online application for ESE2023

 Date of Decision: 17-10-2023

SURENDRA KUMAR CHOUBEY  VS UPSC & ORS. 

                                   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/17_October_2023-Surendra_Kumar_Choubey_vs_Upsc.pdf"]

Latest Legal News