Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     Smell of Alcohol in Post-Mortem Insufficient to Establish Intoxication: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Liability of Insurance Company in Motor Accident Case    |     No Grounds for Transfer: Free Bus Fare for Women in Telangana Reduces Travel Burden: Telangana High Court Rejects Wife's Petition to Transfer Divorce Case    |     Mechanical Referrals Invalid: "Deputy Registrar Must Apply Judicial Mind: Allahabad HC Quashes Deputy Registrar's Order in Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Election Dispute    |    

Redevelopment of Shri Kalkaji Mandir Essential for Devotee Welfare: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has upheld the necessity of the redevelopment and management of the Shri Kalkaji Mandir complex, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the temple's dignity and ensuring the welfare of devotees. Justice Prathiba M. Singh presided over the case, which has been a subject of discussion and legal proceedings for several years.

In her ruling, Justice Singh observed, "The redevelopment of such a significant temple, where lakhs of devotees visit every year, is essential not only for providing better facilities but also for preserving the temple's sanctity." The judgment came as a response to various issues raised concerning women's rights, mismanagement, cleanliness, commercialization, and lack of civic amenities at the temple.

The court has appointed an Administrator for the overall management and administration of the temple and a renowned architect, Mr. Goonmeet Singh Chauhan, for overseeing the redevelopment plans. The court's decision involves the eviction of unauthorized occupants, the preparation of a master plan, and the establishment of a redevelopment fund.

The judgment also addressed objections raised by Mahant Surender Nath, stating that the objections were baseless and did not impede the temple's redevelopment. Justice Singh emphasized, "One individual cannot stall the redevelopment of such a big Mandir, especially when the amenities and facilities for devotees were in a really appalling condition."

The Supreme Court had previously clarified the importance of maintaining the temple and its surroundings in a dignified manner, in the interest of devotees. The High Court's decision aligns with these directives, reinforcing the temple's redevelopment's importance for public welfare.

The final redevelopment plan, which includes preserving existing trees and coordinating with various civic bodies for necessary approvals, has been approved by the court. The next hearing is scheduled for January 12, 2024, to review progress and further steps.

Date of Decision: 22nd December, 2023

NEETA BHARDWAJ & ORS. VS KAMLESH SHARMA   

 

Similar News