UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Redevelopment of Shri Kalkaji Mandir Essential for Devotee Welfare: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has upheld the necessity of the redevelopment and management of the Shri Kalkaji Mandir complex, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the temple's dignity and ensuring the welfare of devotees. Justice Prathiba M. Singh presided over the case, which has been a subject of discussion and legal proceedings for several years.

In her ruling, Justice Singh observed, "The redevelopment of such a significant temple, where lakhs of devotees visit every year, is essential not only for providing better facilities but also for preserving the temple's sanctity." The judgment came as a response to various issues raised concerning women's rights, mismanagement, cleanliness, commercialization, and lack of civic amenities at the temple.

The court has appointed an Administrator for the overall management and administration of the temple and a renowned architect, Mr. Goonmeet Singh Chauhan, for overseeing the redevelopment plans. The court's decision involves the eviction of unauthorized occupants, the preparation of a master plan, and the establishment of a redevelopment fund.

The judgment also addressed objections raised by Mahant Surender Nath, stating that the objections were baseless and did not impede the temple's redevelopment. Justice Singh emphasized, "One individual cannot stall the redevelopment of such a big Mandir, especially when the amenities and facilities for devotees were in a really appalling condition."

The Supreme Court had previously clarified the importance of maintaining the temple and its surroundings in a dignified manner, in the interest of devotees. The High Court's decision aligns with these directives, reinforcing the temple's redevelopment's importance for public welfare.

The final redevelopment plan, which includes preserving existing trees and coordinating with various civic bodies for necessary approvals, has been approved by the court. The next hearing is scheduled for January 12, 2024, to review progress and further steps.

Date of Decision: 22nd December, 2023

NEETA BHARDWAJ & ORS. VS KAMLESH SHARMA   

 

Latest Legal News