Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail in Fraud Case, Delay in FIR and Lack of Involvement in Defrauded Amount

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Single Bench, has granted bail to Manpreet Singh in a fraud case involving allegations of cheating and fraud. The judgment, delivered by Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, highlighted the delay in registering the First Information Report (FIR) and the petitioner’s lack of involvement in the defrauded amount.

The case pertained to an FIR registered on 13-07-2022 under Sections 419, 420, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code at the Cyber Crime Police Station in Chandigarh. The complainant alleged that he had paid a substantial sum to the accused for the purchase of Platinum Premium mobile numbers of a reputed telecom company, which were never activated. The accused, who had received the payment, ceased all communication with the complainant, leading to the filing of the FIR.

During the investigation, it was discovered that the mobile numbers used in the fraudulent activity were registered in the name of a co-accused. The court noted that the petitioner, Manpreet Singh, was not the beneficiary of the defrauded amount and that no recovery had been made from him. Additionally, none of the 15 prosecution witnesses had been examined thus far, and the trial was not expected to conclude in the near future.

Considering these factors, the court granted bail to Manpreet Singh, emphasizing that bail should only be denied in exceptional circumstances in cases triable by a magistrate, unless there are serious allegations of absconding or evidence tampering. The court further directed the petitioner to appear before the concerned police station regularly and submit written confirmation of non-involvement in any other criminal activities.

 

Decided on : 30-05-2023

 

MANPREET SINGH VS STATE OF U.T., CHANDIGARH

Latest Legal News