Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail in Fraud Case, Delay in FIR and Lack of Involvement in Defrauded Amount

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Single Bench, has granted bail to Manpreet Singh in a fraud case involving allegations of cheating and fraud. The judgment, delivered by Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, highlighted the delay in registering the First Information Report (FIR) and the petitioner’s lack of involvement in the defrauded amount.

The case pertained to an FIR registered on 13-07-2022 under Sections 419, 420, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code at the Cyber Crime Police Station in Chandigarh. The complainant alleged that he had paid a substantial sum to the accused for the purchase of Platinum Premium mobile numbers of a reputed telecom company, which were never activated. The accused, who had received the payment, ceased all communication with the complainant, leading to the filing of the FIR.

During the investigation, it was discovered that the mobile numbers used in the fraudulent activity were registered in the name of a co-accused. The court noted that the petitioner, Manpreet Singh, was not the beneficiary of the defrauded amount and that no recovery had been made from him. Additionally, none of the 15 prosecution witnesses had been examined thus far, and the trial was not expected to conclude in the near future.

Considering these factors, the court granted bail to Manpreet Singh, emphasizing that bail should only be denied in exceptional circumstances in cases triable by a magistrate, unless there are serious allegations of absconding or evidence tampering. The court further directed the petitioner to appear before the concerned police station regularly and submit written confirmation of non-involvement in any other criminal activities.

 

Decided on : 30-05-2023

 

MANPREET SINGH VS STATE OF U.T., CHANDIGARH

Latest Legal News