Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims Equity Aids the Vigilant, Not Those Who Sleep Over Their Rights: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses to Revive 36-Year-Old Pay Parity Claim Students Cannot Be Penalised For Legislative Invalidity: Supreme Court Protects Degrees Granted Before 2005 Yash Pal Verdict Restructuring Without Fulfilment of Conditions Cannot Defeat Insolvency: Supreme Court Reaffirms Default as the Sole Trigger Under Section 7 IBC Section 100-A CPC Slams The Door On Intra-Court Appeals In RERA Matters”: Allahabad High Court Declares Special Appeal Not Maintainable Mental Distance Between ‘May Be’ and ‘Must Be’ Is Long: Patna High Court Acquits Six in Murder Case Built on Broken Chain of Circumstances Where Corruption Takes Roots, Rule of Law Is Replaced by Rule of Transaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to DIG Harcharan Singh Bhullar

Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail in Fraud Case, Delay in FIR and Lack of Involvement in Defrauded Amount

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Single Bench, has granted bail to Manpreet Singh in a fraud case involving allegations of cheating and fraud. The judgment, delivered by Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, highlighted the delay in registering the First Information Report (FIR) and the petitioner’s lack of involvement in the defrauded amount.

The case pertained to an FIR registered on 13-07-2022 under Sections 419, 420, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code at the Cyber Crime Police Station in Chandigarh. The complainant alleged that he had paid a substantial sum to the accused for the purchase of Platinum Premium mobile numbers of a reputed telecom company, which were never activated. The accused, who had received the payment, ceased all communication with the complainant, leading to the filing of the FIR.

During the investigation, it was discovered that the mobile numbers used in the fraudulent activity were registered in the name of a co-accused. The court noted that the petitioner, Manpreet Singh, was not the beneficiary of the defrauded amount and that no recovery had been made from him. Additionally, none of the 15 prosecution witnesses had been examined thus far, and the trial was not expected to conclude in the near future.

Considering these factors, the court granted bail to Manpreet Singh, emphasizing that bail should only be denied in exceptional circumstances in cases triable by a magistrate, unless there are serious allegations of absconding or evidence tampering. The court further directed the petitioner to appear before the concerned police station regularly and submit written confirmation of non-involvement in any other criminal activities.

 

Decided on : 30-05-2023

 

MANPREET SINGH VS STATE OF U.T., CHANDIGARH

Latest Legal News