Non-Communication Of Grounds Of Arrest In Writing & Denying Legal Aid During First Remand Vitiates Detention: Punjab & Haryana High Court Trial Court Cannot Disregard Evidence Of Witness Proving Will If Attesting Witnesses Are Deceased: Andhra Pradesh High Court PSPCL Mandates 48-Hour Processing For Lawyers Seeking Conversion To Domestic Electricity Tariff For Court Chambers "Clean Slate Theory": Supreme Court Holds Pending Suits And Arbitrations By Operational Creditors Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of IBC Resolution Plan Deceased Witness's Testimony From Split Trial Admissible Against Absconding Accused Without Prior Formal Order: Supreme Court Term 'Second Class Passenger' Offensive To Spirit Of Constitution, Attach Class Connotation To Coach Instead: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Ticket Does Not Negate Status As Bona Fide Passenger In Railway Accident Claims: Supreme Court "Vulgarity Is Not Obscenity": Supreme Court Says Mere Use Of Swear Words Or Threats During Altercation Not Punishable Under Sections 294(b) & 506 IPC Old Age & Health As Mitigating Factors: Supreme Court Modifies 70-Year-Old's Sentence Under Section 326 IPC To Imprisonment Till Rising Of Court Trial Court Cannot Exclude Property From Partition In Final Decree Proceedings If Review Order Directs Its Division: Telangana High Court Husband Must Inquire If Appeal Is Filed Before Remarrying; Remarriage During Subsistence Of Appeal Cannot Be Ground To Refuse Stay On Divorce Decree: Gujarat High Court Section 24(5) CPC Empowers Superior Courts To Transfer Suits Even From Courts Lacking Jurisdiction; Return Of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 10 Not Only Course: Allahabad HC Nominated Members Of Municipalities Have No Right To Vote In Legislative Council Elections: Supreme Court Writ Jurisdiction In Election Matters Not Absolutely Barred If Alternative Remedy Is Ineffective: Supreme Court Courts Can Presume Official Acts Of Revenue Officers Were Regularly Performed Under Section 114 Evidence Act: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Dispossession Date In Plaint Not Sufficient Ground For Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Telangana High Court

PSPCL Mandates 48-Hour Processing For Lawyers Seeking Conversion To Domestic Electricity Tariff For Court Chambers

18 July 2026 11:03 AM

By: sayum


"Electric connections of lawyers’ chambers registered with the Bar Council of Punjab & Haryana, situated in Court Complexes across the State, being used exclusively for legal professional work and not for secondary commercial activities... shall also be covered in this schedule." Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL), implementing the tariff order issued by the Hon'ble Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission (PSERC), has officially directed that lawyers' chambers in court complexes across the State will now be billed under the 'Domestic Supply' (DS) electricity tariff. In a formal communication directed to all Engineers-in-Chief, the authority clarified that legal practice is a professional activity and instructed officials to expeditiously process applications for converting electricity connections from commercial to domestic categories.

Historically, professionals including advocates operating out of chambers within court complexes have been subjected to higher Non-Residential Supply (NRS) or commercial electricity tariffs. Bar associations and legal practitioners have consistently contended that the legal profession is not a commercial trade or business. Acknowledging this long-standing grievance, the PSERC, vide its Tariff Order for FY 2026-27 dated March 6, 2026, modified the General Conditions of Tariff to grant specific relief to the legal fraternity.

The primary regulatory issue was whether chambers utilized exclusively for legal professional work by registered advocates should be subjected to commercial electricity tariffs or classified under the concessional domestic supply category. The authority was also called upon to determine how to treat mixed-use spaces where secondary commercial activities operate alongside legal chambers.

Legal Profession Recognized As Non-Commercial

The regulatory commission and the PSPCL noted that the legal profession stands on a different footing than standard commercial businesses or trades. To operationalize this distinction, a specific provision was inserted into the Schedules of Tariff for Domestic Supply (DS) under clause SVI.1.5. The circular makes it clear that the domestic tariff schedule will now govern the electricity connections of advocates practicing in the state.

Eligibility Tied To Bar Council Registration

The authority placed specific caveats to ensure that the benefit of the domestic tariff is exclusively availed by genuine legal practitioners. The circular categorically states that the chambers must belong to lawyers who are duly registered with the Bar Council of Punjab & Haryana. Furthermore, these chambers must be physically situated within recognized Court Complexes across the State of Punjab to qualify for the tariff conversion.

Exclusion Of Secondary Commercial Activities

While granting the relief, the regulatory framework carefully ring-fenced the benefit to prevent its misuse by allied businesses operating within court complexes. The authority emphasized that the domestic tariff applies only to spaces used exclusively for legal professional work. The circular expressly noted that secondary commercial activities operating from within or near the chambers, such as canteens, photocopy centers, and typing pools, will not be covered under this schedule and will continue to attract commercial rates.

Expedited Processing Of Tariff Change Applications

To ensure that the benefit of the PSERC's order reaches the advocates without bureaucratic delay, the PSPCL issued strict administrative directions to its field officers. The Chief Engineer/Commercial directed all concerned officers of the DS Sub Divisions to immediately accept applications from eligible lawyers seeking a change of their tariff category to Domestic Supply.

"It is also instructed to complete the process for change of tariff category within two days of receipt of the applications."

Mandatory Compliance Expected From Field Officers

The authority left no room for administrative lethargy, mandating that the process of transitioning an eligible advocate's electricity connection from commercial to domestic must be completed within a strict 48-hour window. The circular concluded with a firm directive stating that meticulous compliance with these instructions must be ensured by all distribution zones.

The tariff order and the subsequent PSPCL circular bring substantial financial relief to practicing advocates across Punjab by formally recognizing that pure legal practice cannot be equated with commercial business for electricity billing. Eligible advocates operating exclusively professional chambers within court complexes can now approach their respective sub-divisions to have their connections converted to domestic supply within two days.

Date of Decision: 17 July 2026 (Memo Date) / 06 March 2026 (PSERC Order)

 

Latest Legal News