Unregistered Gift Deed Cannot Create Title; Injunction Suit Not Maintainable Without Seeking Declaration If Ownership Is Disputed: Delhi High Court PF Default: General Managers Of Co-op Units Not 'Employers' If Ultimate Control Vests With Federation MD, Kerala High Court Quashes Case BCCI Is Not A 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act; Mere Discharge Of Public Functions Not Enough For Inclusion: CIC Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act Is An 'Interlocutory Order', Appeal Under Section 14-A Not Maintainable: Allahabad High Court Electronic Evidence | Nodal Officers Must Be Examined To Prove CDRs; Gait Analysis Inadmissible If Source CCTV Is Corrupted: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Reject Direct Evidence Of Conspiracy On Subjective Notion That It Must Be Hatched In Secrecy: Supreme Court Restores Conviction In Dr. Subbiah Murder Case Waitlisted Candidates Cannot Demand Change Of Posting At Their Whim; Old Select Lists Lapse After Repeal Of Act: Supreme Court NGOs, Individuals Feeding Stray Dogs In Institutional Campuses To Face Tortious Liability For Dog Bites: Supreme Court Stray Dogs Have No Absolute Right To Inhabit Schools, Hospitals Or Restricted Institutional Areas: Supreme Court Bail Jurisdiction Limited To Deciding Release Or Incarceration; High Court Cannot Issue General Directions On Police Accountability: Supreme Court Forest Department Cannot Claim Private Land Without Original Records Or Gazette Notification; Boundaries Prevail Over Area: Sikkim High Court Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators To Vanishing Of Evidence; Trial Court Must Draw Adverse Inference If Crucial Electronic Records Are Not Produced: Rajasthan High Court Land Acquisition: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Compensation Enhancement By Applying Doctrine Of De-Escalation To Government Policy Rates 2-Day Delay In Lodging FIR Immaterial Once Charge Sheet Is Filed In Motor Accident Cases: Orissa High Court Matrimonial Settlement Enforceable Under Contempt Jurisdiction: Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Wife To Abide By Agreement After Receiving ₹1.5 Crore Prosecution Bound By Statements Of Its Own Witnesses; Absence Of Accused’s Signature On Seizure Memo Justifies Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh HC

Personal Liberty in Valid Muslim Marriage: High Court Asserts Age of Majority 15 Years

05 September 2024 6:15 AM

By: Admin


Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a resounding affirmation of personal liberty and the validity of a Muslim marriage contracted by individuals above the age of puberty. The decision, handed down on December 13, 2023, by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, has far-reaching implications for cases involving the protection of personal freedom and the competence of Muslim individuals to enter into marriages of their choice.

The case, CRWP-11190-2023, revolved around Shameem and Salma, both Muslims by religion. The petitioners, aged 23 and more than 16 years old, respectively, entered into a matrimonial bond against the wishes of their families, performing a Muslim marriage ceremony on November 8, 2023. Fearing for their life and liberty, the couple approached the High Court, seeking protection from potential threats posed by family members who disapproved of their union.

On the other side, the parents of Salma filed a separate petition, CRWP-11123-2023, requesting a writ of habeas corpus to produce their minor daughter Salma from the custody of Shameem. They argued that Salma was a minor and had been abducted, leading to the registration of an FIR for kidnapping.

The central legal question in the case was whether Salma's marriage, performed above the age of 15, was valid under Muslim Personal Law and whether the couple should be granted protection.

Justice Deepak Gupta's judgment highlighted the importance of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. He stated, "The Court cannot shut its eyes to the fact that the apprehension of the petitioners needs to be addressed. Merely because the petitioners have got married against the wishes of their family members, they cannot possibly be deprived of the fundamental rights as envisaged in the Constitution of India."

The court relied on legal precedents, emphasizing that in Muslim law, puberty and majority are considered the same, with a presumption that a person attains majority at the age of 15 years. Therefore, the marriage between the petitioners was deemed valid.

The verdict concluded by granting custody of Salma to her husband, Shameem, asserting that the parents' wishes were inconsequential in this case. The court also directed the official respondents to provide necessary protection to the married couple as required.

Date of Decision: December 13, 2023

Iqbal and Another VS State of Haryana and Others

Latest Legal News