Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Persistent Character Doubt Constitutes Cruelty: High Court of Madhya Pradesh Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior, in a significant judgment, has granted divorce to Kalpana Jat, the appellant, on grounds of mental cruelty. The bench comprising Hon’ble Shri Justice Rohit Arya and Hon’ble Shri Justice Binod Kumar Dwivedi overturned the Family Court’s decision, which had earlier dismissed her plea.

The Court’s ruling was based on the assessment of mental cruelty inflicted upon the appellant by the respondent, Balveer Singh Jat. The Court noted, “Mental cruelty proved by persistent doubt on character.”

Kalpana Jat, a Samvida Sikshak Grade-3, alleged continuous mental and physical harassment by her husband, leading to their separation since April 1, 2019. The primary issues revolved around allegations of cruelty, infidelity, and character assassination by the respondent.

The Court meticulously examined the testimonies, evidences, and behavior patterns of the respondent. It was noted that the respondent’s conduct, including baseless allegations, physical assault, and harassment, constituted mental cruelty. The Court stated, “The appellant’s consistent testimony and respondent’s conduct in previous legal proceedings substantiate claims of mental cruelty.”

The Court also discussed the concept of mental cruelty In matrimonial matters, referring to various Apex Court judgments. The lack of evidence regarding Stridhan claims led the Court to pass no order on this matter.

Ultimately, the Court dissolved the marriage between Kalpana Jat and Balveer Singh Jat, granting the divorce on grounds of cruelty as per Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Date of Decision: February 13, 2024

Xxx vs xxx

 

Latest Legal News