UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Persistent Character Doubt Constitutes Cruelty: High Court of Madhya Pradesh Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior, in a significant judgment, has granted divorce to Kalpana Jat, the appellant, on grounds of mental cruelty. The bench comprising Hon’ble Shri Justice Rohit Arya and Hon’ble Shri Justice Binod Kumar Dwivedi overturned the Family Court’s decision, which had earlier dismissed her plea.

The Court’s ruling was based on the assessment of mental cruelty inflicted upon the appellant by the respondent, Balveer Singh Jat. The Court noted, “Mental cruelty proved by persistent doubt on character.”

Kalpana Jat, a Samvida Sikshak Grade-3, alleged continuous mental and physical harassment by her husband, leading to their separation since April 1, 2019. The primary issues revolved around allegations of cruelty, infidelity, and character assassination by the respondent.

The Court meticulously examined the testimonies, evidences, and behavior patterns of the respondent. It was noted that the respondent’s conduct, including baseless allegations, physical assault, and harassment, constituted mental cruelty. The Court stated, “The appellant’s consistent testimony and respondent’s conduct in previous legal proceedings substantiate claims of mental cruelty.”

The Court also discussed the concept of mental cruelty In matrimonial matters, referring to various Apex Court judgments. The lack of evidence regarding Stridhan claims led the Court to pass no order on this matter.

Ultimately, the Court dissolved the marriage between Kalpana Jat and Balveer Singh Jat, granting the divorce on grounds of cruelty as per Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Date of Decision: February 13, 2024

Xxx vs xxx

 

Latest Legal News