High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

Madhya Pradesh MLA Got Anticipatory Bail in Marital Rape Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court allows anticipatory bail in a case of alleged marital rape. The order was passed on March 17th, 2023, by Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Dwivedi in Misc. Criminal Case No. 11704 of 2023 in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur.

The applicant, Umang Singh Shingar, a 48-year-old MLA from Dhar, had filed the application seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 540/2022 registered at Police Station Naogaon District Dhar. The case was registered against him for the offences punishable under Sections 294, 323, 376(2)(N), 377, 498-A and 506 of IPC.

The prosecution alleged that the applicant had made physical relations with the prosecutrix on the pretext of marriage and had committed marital rape, as well as unnatural sex. The applicant's counsel, however, submitted that the prosecutrix was in a love affair with the applicant, who was also married, and that the allegations were false and motivated by a desire to extract money from the applicant.

The Court, while acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, observed that the case was not one of forceful compulsion by the applicant and that the prosecutrix was mentally sound, educated, and in politics at the time of developing the physical relationship. The Court also noted the tendency to make allegations of rape and unnatural sex against husbands or persons in love affairs with certain motives.

Accordingly, the Court allowed the application for anticipatory bail without commenting on the merits of the case. The applicant was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs.2,00,000/- with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer/Arresting Officer of the Police Station concerned, and to comply with several conditions, including cooperating with the investigation and trial, not committing an offence similar to the alleged offence, and not leaving India without prior permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer.

Umang Singh Shingar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Latest Legal News