Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years

Madhya Pradesh MLA Got Anticipatory Bail in Marital Rape Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court allows anticipatory bail in a case of alleged marital rape. The order was passed on March 17th, 2023, by Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Dwivedi in Misc. Criminal Case No. 11704 of 2023 in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur.

The applicant, Umang Singh Shingar, a 48-year-old MLA from Dhar, had filed the application seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 540/2022 registered at Police Station Naogaon District Dhar. The case was registered against him for the offences punishable under Sections 294, 323, 376(2)(N), 377, 498-A and 506 of IPC.

The prosecution alleged that the applicant had made physical relations with the prosecutrix on the pretext of marriage and had committed marital rape, as well as unnatural sex. The applicant's counsel, however, submitted that the prosecutrix was in a love affair with the applicant, who was also married, and that the allegations were false and motivated by a desire to extract money from the applicant.

The Court, while acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, observed that the case was not one of forceful compulsion by the applicant and that the prosecutrix was mentally sound, educated, and in politics at the time of developing the physical relationship. The Court also noted the tendency to make allegations of rape and unnatural sex against husbands or persons in love affairs with certain motives.

Accordingly, the Court allowed the application for anticipatory bail without commenting on the merits of the case. The applicant was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs.2,00,000/- with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer/Arresting Officer of the Police Station concerned, and to comply with several conditions, including cooperating with the investigation and trial, not committing an offence similar to the alleged offence, and not leaving India without prior permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer.

Umang Singh Shingar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Latest Legal News