Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Madhya Pradesh MLA Got Anticipatory Bail in Marital Rape Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court allows anticipatory bail in a case of alleged marital rape. The order was passed on March 17th, 2023, by Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Dwivedi in Misc. Criminal Case No. 11704 of 2023 in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur.

The applicant, Umang Singh Shingar, a 48-year-old MLA from Dhar, had filed the application seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 540/2022 registered at Police Station Naogaon District Dhar. The case was registered against him for the offences punishable under Sections 294, 323, 376(2)(N), 377, 498-A and 506 of IPC.

The prosecution alleged that the applicant had made physical relations with the prosecutrix on the pretext of marriage and had committed marital rape, as well as unnatural sex. The applicant's counsel, however, submitted that the prosecutrix was in a love affair with the applicant, who was also married, and that the allegations were false and motivated by a desire to extract money from the applicant.

The Court, while acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, observed that the case was not one of forceful compulsion by the applicant and that the prosecutrix was mentally sound, educated, and in politics at the time of developing the physical relationship. The Court also noted the tendency to make allegations of rape and unnatural sex against husbands or persons in love affairs with certain motives.

Accordingly, the Court allowed the application for anticipatory bail without commenting on the merits of the case. The applicant was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs.2,00,000/- with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer/Arresting Officer of the Police Station concerned, and to comply with several conditions, including cooperating with the investigation and trial, not committing an offence similar to the alleged offence, and not leaving India without prior permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer.

Umang Singh Shingar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Latest Legal News