CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Long period of incarceration is a good ground to grant bail – Pb & Hry HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Punjab and Haryana High Court observed in a bail application in the case of Union of India versus K.A. Najeeb (supra), the Supreme Court has held that long custody would be an essential factor while granting bail under the UAPA. Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides right to speedy trial and long period of incarceration would be a good ground to grant bail to an under-trial for an offence punishable under the UAPA.

Facts - Petitioner has been arraigned as an accused on the statement of co-accused Dharminder Singh @ Fauji - petitioner had posted on her Facebook about 'Sikhs for Justice 2020 Referendum' - no allegation taken part in any unlawful activity under sections  – argued -Sikhs for Justice Organisation'  banned in July, 2019 while posted on Facebook on 31.05.2018 – state opposed bail - contends - petitioner actively indulged in unlawful activities -  part of a group which was carrying out activities related to referendum-2020 - Circulated the video recording of the incident after the wine shop set on fire - recovery of six mobile phones and five pen drives  and audio recording conversation with co-accused wherein Petitioner was stating a newspaper get registered and carry out assassinations.

Punjab and Haryana High Court further observed in bail application that the allegations against the petitioner are that she had posted about 'referendum-2020' on her facebook account and there is stated to be an audio recording of  the petitioner  being in conversation with co-accused.  Its authenticity and evidentiary value would be determined at the trial. There is no reference to any act of violence (overt) which was committed by any of the accused in the instant case or that any individual had been harmed in the instant case. 

Court Held - authenticity and evidentiary of audio recording determined at the trial – No act of violence committed – No one harmed - petitioner is a lady with three minor children- nine months old child lodged with her in jail - petitioner in custody for over two years and three months -Challan has been filed but there is no likelihood of the trial being concluded soon – Bail Allowed.

D.D: 21.12.2021

Deep Kaur @ Kulvir Kaur  Versus State of Punjab       

Latest Legal News