District Judiciary Retirement Age | Supreme Court Directs Enhancement To 62 Years To Arrest Attrition Of Judicial Talent Slogans Inciting Armed Rebellion Or Challenging Sovereignty Cannot Be Equated With Religious Expressions: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail Revisional Authority Under AP ROR Act Has Jurisdiction To Direct Inquiry Into Illegal Transfers Of Assigned Land: Andhra Pradesh High Court Indian Law Does Not Recognise 'Joint Parenting' As A Statutory Concept; Child Welfare Remains Paramount: Bombay High Court Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Court Must Appoint Survey-Knowing Commissioner In Suits Alleging Physical Encroachment And Boundary Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 33-C(2) ID Act | Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Recover Consequential Benefits Arising From CAT Orders: Delhi High Court Order VIII Rule 1-A(3) CPC | Procedural Law Is Meant For Advancement Of Justice; Technicalities Should Not Scuttle Opportunity To Lead Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court Can Condition Condonation Of Delay In Land Acquisition Appeals Upon Waiver Of Interest For Delayed Period: Bombay High Court Employees Compensation Act | Insurance Company Not Liable To Indemnify Penalty Imposed On Employer Under Section 4-A(3)(b): Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees’ Compensation Act | Failure To Frame Issue On Employer-Employee Relationship Vitiates Commissioner’s Award: Kerala High Court Default Bail Under Section 187 BNSS | Period Of Investigation Depends On Substance Of Allegations In FIR, Not Merely Mentioned Sections: Madhya Pradesh High Court SARFAESI Act | Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Must Be Challenged Under Section 17 Before DRT, Not Via Writ Petition: Kerala High Court

Land Acquisition for National Highways Upheld as Court Embraces Eco-Friendly Approach: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment dated October 20, 2023, the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the land acquisition for a National Highway project, emphasizing its dual purpose of highway construction and environmentally conscious activities. The Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Amarjit Gandhi and another, challenging the acquisition.

The petitioners had sought the quashing of notifications and awards related to the land acquisition for the National Highway project. They argued that the acquired land would be used for horticultural purposes, diverting it from its intended use for highway construction.

Justice Sureshwar Thakur, delivering the judgment, observed, "The above utilization of the part of the national highways for floricultural and horticultural activities would naturally ensure that carbon sinks are provided at the national highways, mitigating the deleterious effects of carbon emissions."

The Court found that the land's utilization for floricultural and horticultural activities aligned with the holistic purpose of mitigating carbon emissions along national highways. The judgment highlighted the importance of balancing infrastructure development with environmental considerations.

The petition was represented by Mr. Divanshu Jain and Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocates for the petitioners, Mr. R.S. Madaan, Advocate for respondent No. 2-NHAI, and Mr. Maninder Singh, DAG, Punjab.

This judgment reaffirms the commitment to sustainable development and underscores the significance of maintaining a balance between infrastructure expansion and environmental protection.

Date of Decision: 20 October 2023

Amarjit Gandhi and another VS Union of India and others

   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20-Oct-2023-Amarjit_Gandhi_And_Anr_vs_Union_Of_India-P^0H.pdf"]

Latest Legal News