Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Land Acquisition for National Highways Upheld as Court Embraces Eco-Friendly Approach: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment dated October 20, 2023, the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the land acquisition for a National Highway project, emphasizing its dual purpose of highway construction and environmentally conscious activities. The Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Amarjit Gandhi and another, challenging the acquisition.

The petitioners had sought the quashing of notifications and awards related to the land acquisition for the National Highway project. They argued that the acquired land would be used for horticultural purposes, diverting it from its intended use for highway construction.

Justice Sureshwar Thakur, delivering the judgment, observed, "The above utilization of the part of the national highways for floricultural and horticultural activities would naturally ensure that carbon sinks are provided at the national highways, mitigating the deleterious effects of carbon emissions."

The Court found that the land's utilization for floricultural and horticultural activities aligned with the holistic purpose of mitigating carbon emissions along national highways. The judgment highlighted the importance of balancing infrastructure development with environmental considerations.

The petition was represented by Mr. Divanshu Jain and Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocates for the petitioners, Mr. R.S. Madaan, Advocate for respondent No. 2-NHAI, and Mr. Maninder Singh, DAG, Punjab.

This judgment reaffirms the commitment to sustainable development and underscores the significance of maintaining a balance between infrastructure expansion and environmental protection.

Date of Decision: 20 October 2023

Amarjit Gandhi and another VS Union of India and others

   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20-Oct-2023-Amarjit_Gandhi_And_Anr_vs_Union_Of_India-P^0H.pdf"]

Latest Legal News