Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Land Acquisition for National Highways Upheld as Court Embraces Eco-Friendly Approach: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment dated October 20, 2023, the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the land acquisition for a National Highway project, emphasizing its dual purpose of highway construction and environmentally conscious activities. The Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Amarjit Gandhi and another, challenging the acquisition.

The petitioners had sought the quashing of notifications and awards related to the land acquisition for the National Highway project. They argued that the acquired land would be used for horticultural purposes, diverting it from its intended use for highway construction.

Justice Sureshwar Thakur, delivering the judgment, observed, "The above utilization of the part of the national highways for floricultural and horticultural activities would naturally ensure that carbon sinks are provided at the national highways, mitigating the deleterious effects of carbon emissions."

The Court found that the land's utilization for floricultural and horticultural activities aligned with the holistic purpose of mitigating carbon emissions along national highways. The judgment highlighted the importance of balancing infrastructure development with environmental considerations.

The petition was represented by Mr. Divanshu Jain and Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocates for the petitioners, Mr. R.S. Madaan, Advocate for respondent No. 2-NHAI, and Mr. Maninder Singh, DAG, Punjab.

This judgment reaffirms the commitment to sustainable development and underscores the significance of maintaining a balance between infrastructure expansion and environmental protection.

Date of Decision: 20 October 2023

Amarjit Gandhi and another VS Union of India and others

   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20-Oct-2023-Amarjit_Gandhi_And_Anr_vs_Union_Of_India-P^0H.pdf"]

Latest Legal News