Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Land Acquisition for National Highways Upheld as Court Embraces Eco-Friendly Approach: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment dated October 20, 2023, the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the land acquisition for a National Highway project, emphasizing its dual purpose of highway construction and environmentally conscious activities. The Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Amarjit Gandhi and another, challenging the acquisition.

The petitioners had sought the quashing of notifications and awards related to the land acquisition for the National Highway project. They argued that the acquired land would be used for horticultural purposes, diverting it from its intended use for highway construction.

Justice Sureshwar Thakur, delivering the judgment, observed, "The above utilization of the part of the national highways for floricultural and horticultural activities would naturally ensure that carbon sinks are provided at the national highways, mitigating the deleterious effects of carbon emissions."

The Court found that the land's utilization for floricultural and horticultural activities aligned with the holistic purpose of mitigating carbon emissions along national highways. The judgment highlighted the importance of balancing infrastructure development with environmental considerations.

The petition was represented by Mr. Divanshu Jain and Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocates for the petitioners, Mr. R.S. Madaan, Advocate for respondent No. 2-NHAI, and Mr. Maninder Singh, DAG, Punjab.

This judgment reaffirms the commitment to sustainable development and underscores the significance of maintaining a balance between infrastructure expansion and environmental protection.

Date of Decision: 20 October 2023

Amarjit Gandhi and another VS Union of India and others

   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20-Oct-2023-Amarjit_Gandhi_And_Anr_vs_Union_Of_India-P^0H.pdf"]

Latest Legal News