-
by sayum
04 July 2026 7:39 AM
Date: May 25, 2023
In a significant ruling, the Labor Court, comprising Acting Chief Justice S. Vaidyanathan and Judge R. Kalaimathi, modified the dismissal order of a workman and directed the management to reinstate the employee without backwages. The judgment, delivered on May 25, 2023, has far-reaching implications for labor disputes and the fairness of domestic enquiries.
The case involved allegations of serious misconduct by the workman, including the use of abusive language and assault on a superior officer. The management had imposed the extreme penalty of dismissal from service, citing the employee’s past record and the gravity of the charges. However, the Labor Court, exercising its power under Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, reevaluated the evidence and concluded that the punishment was disproportionate.
In its verdict, the Labor Court emphasized that the power to interfere with charges lies within its purview, and it can set aside a dismissal if it finds the punishment to be grossly disproportionate or if there are errors in the enquiry process. The Court also highlighted that the fairness of the domestic enquiry had been upheld, and the workman’s conduct could not be justified. However, considering the employee’s age and the difficulties of securing employment at this stage, the Court ordered reinstatement with continuity of service and all attendant benefits.
Date of Decision: May 25, 2023
S.Raja vs M/s.Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/25-May-23-^GS-Raja-v-Hindustan-Unilever-Ltd-and-another-Mad-HC.pdf"]
