Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Delays in processing applications for premature release cannot deprive convicts of interim relief: Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole Listing All Appeals Arising From A Common Judgment Before The Same Bench Avoids Contradictory Rulings: Full Bench of the Patna High Court. Age Claims in Borderline Cases Demand Scrutiny: Madhya Pradesh HC on Juvenile Justice Act Bishop Garden Not Available for Partition Due to Legal Quietus on Declaration Suit: Madras High Court Exclusion of Certain Heirs Alone Does Not Make a Will Suspicious: Kerala High Court Upholds Validity of Will Proof of Delivery Was Never Requested, Nor Was it a Payment Precondition: Delhi High Court Held Courier Firm Entitled to Payment Despite Non-Delivery Allegations Widowed Daughter Eligible for Compassionate Appointment under BSNL Scheme: Allahabad High Court Brutality of an Offence Does Not Dispense With Legal Proof: Supreme Court Overturns Life Imprisonment of Two Accused Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son

Judicial Consistency is Key: Allahabad High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Allahabad High Court has granted anticipatory bail to Abhishek Yadav, highlighting the necessity of consistency in judicial decisions. The judgment by Justice Krishan Pahal scrutinized earlier contradictory rulings and reinforced the importance of judicial integrity and fairness, especially in matters involving personal liberty.

Case Background: The anticipatory bail application was filed by Abhishek Yadav in connection with Case Crime No.138 of 2023, involving charges under Sections 147, 323, 336, 308, 504, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The case originated from an altercation on June 7, 2023, escalating into a confrontation at the informant's residence on June 9, 2023, resulting in injuries to Shogendra Singh and Ishu Singh.

Inconsistency in Judicial Orders: Justice Pahal noted the inconsistency in orders passed by the same judicial officer on similar anticipatory bail applications in the same case. "Judicial decisions must be uniform to maintain the integrity and trust in the legal system," Justice Pahal stated. The court criticized the lack of reasoning in differentiating the rejection of Abhishek Yadav’s bail application from those granted to co-accused on similar grounds.

Credibility of Medical Evidence: The court addressed the medical evidence presented, which was allegedly procured in collusion with a private hospital. Despite these claims, the injuries sustained by the victims were acknowledged, but the lack of bony injuries was a factor in the decision.

Principles of Parity: Emphasizing the importance of parity, the court observed, "The applicant’s case was at par with the co-accused who had been granted anticipatory bail. Inconsistent orders undermine public confidence in the judiciary." The principle of treating similarly situated individuals equally was underscored.

Legal Reasoning: The judgment drew extensively on the principles laid out in landmark cases, including Satender Kumar Antil Vs. CBI, highlighting the need for consistency in judicial decisions. "Uniformity and certainty in the decisions of the court are the foundations of judicial dispensation," Justice Pahal asserted.

Quotes from the Judgment: Justice Pahal remarked, "The fairness of the judicial proceedings is pivotal for the faith of the litigants. Inconsistent judicial orders can lead to discrimination among accused persons, especially when the facts and circumstances are similar or identical."

Conclusion: The judgment granting anticipatory bail to Abhishek Yadav reaffirms the judiciary's commitment to maintaining fairness and consistency in its decisions. By addressing the inconsistencies in previous orders and emphasizing the principles of parity, the Allahabad High Court has reinforced the importance of judicial integrity. This decision is expected to influence future bail applications, ensuring that personal liberty is protected under a fair and predictable legal system.

Date of Decision: June 4, 2024

Abhishek Yadav @ Laloo vs. State of U.P.

Similar News