Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims Equity Aids the Vigilant, Not Those Who Sleep Over Their Rights: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses to Revive 36-Year-Old Pay Parity Claim Students Cannot Be Penalised For Legislative Invalidity: Supreme Court Protects Degrees Granted Before 2005 Yash Pal Verdict Restructuring Without Fulfilment of Conditions Cannot Defeat Insolvency: Supreme Court Reaffirms Default as the Sole Trigger Under Section 7 IBC Section 100-A CPC Slams The Door On Intra-Court Appeals In RERA Matters”: Allahabad High Court Declares Special Appeal Not Maintainable Mental Distance Between ‘May Be’ and ‘Must Be’ Is Long: Patna High Court Acquits Six in Murder Case Built on Broken Chain of Circumstances Where Corruption Takes Roots, Rule of Law Is Replaced by Rule of Transaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to DIG Harcharan Singh Bhullar

High Court of Delhi Grants Interim Bail on Medical Grounds under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2005

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the High Court of Delhi has granted interim bail on medical grounds to an undertrial prisoner under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2005 (PMLA). The court emphasized the importance of protecting the fundamental right to health and providing adequate medical treatment to prisoners, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The case pertained to a petitioner who sought interim bail on medical grounds, citing various ailments and the need for specialized treatment that could not be provided within the confines of the jail. The court noted that while not every ailment warrants bail, the medical condition of the petitioner should be given primacy, and if specialized or sustained treatment is necessary, interim bail may be granted.

To assess the petitioner's medical condition and urgency for specialized treatment, the court constituted a medical board consisting of experts from the prestigious All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). The medical board was directed to evaluate the petitioner's condition, including the need for diagnostic procedures and the potential risks to the petitioner's life due to delays in treatment. The board's report is expected to provide crucial insights into the petitioner's medical requirements and guide the court's decision on granting interim bail.

The court highlighted the obligation of the state to provide adequate and effective medical treatment to all individuals in custody, whether under trial or convicts. It relied on previous Supreme Court judgments emphasizing the preservation of life as paramount and recognizing the right to health as an important facet of Article 21 of the Constitution.

Date of Decision : 05.06.2023

SANJAY JAIN vs  ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE 

Latest Legal News