Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court

High Court of Delhi Grants Interim Bail on Medical Grounds under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2005

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the High Court of Delhi has granted interim bail on medical grounds to an undertrial prisoner under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2005 (PMLA). The court emphasized the importance of protecting the fundamental right to health and providing adequate medical treatment to prisoners, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The case pertained to a petitioner who sought interim bail on medical grounds, citing various ailments and the need for specialized treatment that could not be provided within the confines of the jail. The court noted that while not every ailment warrants bail, the medical condition of the petitioner should be given primacy, and if specialized or sustained treatment is necessary, interim bail may be granted.

To assess the petitioner's medical condition and urgency for specialized treatment, the court constituted a medical board consisting of experts from the prestigious All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). The medical board was directed to evaluate the petitioner's condition, including the need for diagnostic procedures and the potential risks to the petitioner's life due to delays in treatment. The board's report is expected to provide crucial insights into the petitioner's medical requirements and guide the court's decision on granting interim bail.

The court highlighted the obligation of the state to provide adequate and effective medical treatment to all individuals in custody, whether under trial or convicts. It relied on previous Supreme Court judgments emphasizing the preservation of life as paramount and recognizing the right to health as an important facet of Article 21 of the Constitution.

Date of Decision : 05.06.2023

SANJAY JAIN vs  ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE 

Latest Legal News