Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Petitioner Did Not Endorse Part-Payments on Cheque; Section 138 NI Act Not Attracted: Madras High Court Minority Christian Schools Not Bound by Rules of 2018; Disciplinary Proceedings Can Continue: High Court of Calcutta Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

High Court Grants Regular Bail Emphasizing Right to Speedy Trial in Murder Case Involving Illicit Relationship

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has granted regular bail to Manpreet Kaur, who was accused of murdering her husband, highlighting the fundamental right to a speedy trial as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The case, bearing FIR No.38 dated 08.04.2021, involved charges under Sections 302/34/328/201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The judgment, delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR on 10.01.2024, addressed the petitioner's prolonged custody and the need for expeditious legal proceedings. Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner, argued that Manpreet Kaur, a mother of a minor child, had been incarcerated since April 8, 2021, severely affecting the welfare of her child.

The court underscored the importance of a speedy trial, stating, "The foundational concept of criminal jurisprudence is to ensure a speedy trial. The right to speedy trial is enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India." The court further explained that this right encompasses all aspects of the legal process, including investigation, trial, appeal, and revision.

The prosecution's case relied on circumstantial evidence, but key witnesses, including Manjit Singh, PW-5, did not support the prosecution's claims. Medical reports also contradicted the prosecution's version, as no evidence of sleeping pill ingestion was found. Instead, only ethyl alcohol was discovered in the deceased's body.

Despite the serious nature of the allegations, the court recognized that Manpreet Kaur had been in custody for an extended period, and the trial had not progressed significantly, with only 15 out of 35 prosecution witnesses examined so far. The court concluded that the determination of culpability should occur during the trial.

In its decision, the court granted Manpreet Kaur regular bail, emphasizing that this decision was based on the duration of her custody and should not be construed as an opinion on the merits of the case. The court urged the trial court to proceed without being influenced by any observations made during this bail hearing.

Date of Decision: 10.01.2024

Manpreet Kaur VS State of Punjab

 

Similar News