Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Delays in processing applications for premature release cannot deprive convicts of interim relief: Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole Listing All Appeals Arising From A Common Judgment Before The Same Bench Avoids Contradictory Rulings: Full Bench of the Patna High Court. Age Claims in Borderline Cases Demand Scrutiny: Madhya Pradesh HC on Juvenile Justice Act Bishop Garden Not Available for Partition Due to Legal Quietus on Declaration Suit: Madras High Court Exclusion of Certain Heirs Alone Does Not Make a Will Suspicious: Kerala High Court Upholds Validity of Will Proof of Delivery Was Never Requested, Nor Was it a Payment Precondition: Delhi High Court Held Courier Firm Entitled to Payment Despite Non-Delivery Allegations Widowed Daughter Eligible for Compassionate Appointment under BSNL Scheme: Allahabad High Court Brutality of an Offence Does Not Dispense With Legal Proof: Supreme Court Overturns Life Imprisonment of Two Accused Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son

High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Judgment: 'No Explanation for Delay Provided' Emphasizes Justice Sarin"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court has upheld the dismissal of Sakattar Singh's application to set aside an ex-parte judgment and decree, citing a lack of justifiable explanation for the delay in filing the application. The judgment, delivered by Justice Alka Sarin, emphasizes the importance of procedural discipline and the credibility of the service address used in legal proceedings.

The case involves a suit filed by Manjit Singh for possession by way of specific performance of an agreement to sell dated November 11, 1999, against Sakattar Singh and another defendant. The trial court had passed an ex-parte judgment and decree in January 2007. Sakattar Singh filed an application to set aside this ex-parte judgment, claiming he was not served at his correct address. This application was dismissed by both the trial court and the appellate court, prompting Sakattar Singh to file a revision petition in the High Court.

Credibility of Service Address: Justice Sarin meticulously analyzed the petitioner’s claim regarding the incorrect service address, finding it baseless. "Summons were served at the same address as mentioned in the execution petition, which the petitioner acknowledged," the court observed. The consistency in the address used undermined the petitioner’s argument.

Delay in Filing Application: A crucial aspect of the court's decision was the unexplained delay in filing the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. "Even if the date of knowledge is considered to be 14.05.2012, there is no explanation given for the delay in filing the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC which was filed after a delay of more than one year," Justice Sarin noted. The absence of any application or prayer for condonation of delay further weakened the petitioner’s case.

The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural timelines and providing credible explanations for any delays. "There is absolutely no explanation forthcoming for the said delay," the court reiterated. The lack of an application for condonation of delay or even a prayer for it was highlighted as a significant lapse in the petitioner’s case.

Justice Sarin remarked, "The defendant's claim of incorrect address is unsubstantiated, especially given his acknowledgment of the address during the execution proceedings. The delay in filing the application remains unexplained, indicating a lack of diligence on the part of the petitioner."

The High Court's dismissal of the revision petition reinforces the judiciary’s commitment to procedural discipline and timely action. By affirming the lower courts' findings, the judgment sends a strong message about the necessity of credible and timely explanations for procedural delays. This decision is expected to influence future cases, underscoring the importance of adhering to procedural rules and timelines.

Date of Decision: 7th June 2024

Sakattar Singh vs. Manjit Singh and Others

Similar News