Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Gujarat High Court Rules Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Requires Company to be Joined as Party Accused

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court, presided over by Justice Nisha M. Thakore, clarified the maintainability of complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that for such prosecutions, it is necessary to join the company as a party accused.

According to the judgment, "Maintaining the prosecution under Section 141 of the Act necessitates the inclusion of the company as an accused. The other categories of offenders can only be brought under vicarious liability if the company is named as an accused." The court emphasized the importance of strict compliance with the law, stating that "the complaint is dismissed for non-maintainability in the absence of the company being joined as a party accused" [Para 9].

The court further clarified that a company, as a juristic person, cannot be held criminally liable without being arraigned as an accused. It highlighted the need for specific averments in the complaint to make the accused individuals vicariously liable. However, directors or officers signing cheques on behalf of the company are exempt from this requirement. The person sought to be made liable must be in charge of and responsible for the company's conduct at the relevant time [Para 12].

Decided on: 06.06.2023

Ravi Chetwani Proprietor of M/s Laxmi Store vs State of Gujarat

Latest Legal News