Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Establishes Method for Gunny Bag Depreciation: Straight-Line Method Prevails: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment handed down on October 3, 2023, the High Court has resolved a long-standing dispute over the method for calculating the depreciation of reused gunny bags. The judgment establishes that the straight-line method, as prescribed by Central Government instructions dated May 24, 2013, will prevail for both the first and second use of these bags.

The High Court's observation stated, "The Central Government has consciously decided that the rate as well as the method of calculation of depreciation in the case of reused gunny bags. The rate of depreciation for the first and second use is 40% of the original value, meaning the straight-line method would be followed."

This ruling comes after years of uncertainty and conflicting interpretations of guidelines related to the reuse of gunny bags used for grain storage. The judgment has significant implications for millers and government agencies involved in grain procurement.

Additionally, the High Court dismissed the argument that the Central Government's instructions dated November 1, 2013, made the guidelines prospective, stating that these instructions contradicted the standing guidelines of May 24, 2013. The court emphasized that the instructions remained applicable unless explicitly superseded by the Central Government.

As a result of this judgment, the parties involved are directed to decide claims based on the instructions dated May 24, 2013, for the relevant financial years. This decision brings much-needed clarity to the calculation of depreciation for reused gunny bags, ending years of ambiguity and legal disputes.

Date of Decision: 03.10.2023

M/s J.K. Enterprises vs   Union of India and Others     

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/M_S_J_K_Enterprises_vs_Union_Of_India_And_Others_on_10_October_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News