Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Establishes Method for Gunny Bag Depreciation: Straight-Line Method Prevails: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment handed down on October 3, 2023, the High Court has resolved a long-standing dispute over the method for calculating the depreciation of reused gunny bags. The judgment establishes that the straight-line method, as prescribed by Central Government instructions dated May 24, 2013, will prevail for both the first and second use of these bags.

The High Court's observation stated, "The Central Government has consciously decided that the rate as well as the method of calculation of depreciation in the case of reused gunny bags. The rate of depreciation for the first and second use is 40% of the original value, meaning the straight-line method would be followed."

This ruling comes after years of uncertainty and conflicting interpretations of guidelines related to the reuse of gunny bags used for grain storage. The judgment has significant implications for millers and government agencies involved in grain procurement.

Additionally, the High Court dismissed the argument that the Central Government's instructions dated November 1, 2013, made the guidelines prospective, stating that these instructions contradicted the standing guidelines of May 24, 2013. The court emphasized that the instructions remained applicable unless explicitly superseded by the Central Government.

As a result of this judgment, the parties involved are directed to decide claims based on the instructions dated May 24, 2013, for the relevant financial years. This decision brings much-needed clarity to the calculation of depreciation for reused gunny bags, ending years of ambiguity and legal disputes.

Date of Decision: 03.10.2023

M/s J.K. Enterprises vs   Union of India and Others     

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/M_S_J_K_Enterprises_vs_Union_Of_India_And_Others_on_10_October_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News