Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Equal Protection of Rights in Export Policy: Strikes Down Export Quota Criteria for Broken Rice Allocation: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment handed down on October 20, 2023, the Delhi High Court has set aside the allocation criteria for the export of broken rice to specific countries, asserting that it violates fundamental principles of fairness and equal protection under the law.

The Court, in its verdict, declared that the policy of allocating quotas for the export of broken rice to certain rice exporters, based on their previous exports to particular countries, lacked a rational nexus to the intended goal of ensuring capacity and quality. Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Amit Mahajan emphasized that the classification of rice exporters into separate categories, which determined their eligibility for export quotas, could not be exempt from judicial scrutiny.

Delhi High Court Stated , "The assumption that the exporters that have exported rice to the given countries in question would have the capacity to do so may not be unfounded. However, the point is not whether the rice exporters that have past experience of exporting to the countries in question would have the capacity to service the export quota; the point is whether such exporters would in any manner hold out a more credible assurance of capacity to service the export orders in comparison with other rice exporters having a similar or higher export turnover but to other countries. If the answer to this is in the negative, then clearly the given classification does not have any nexus with the object of ensuring capacity to service the export orders."

The judgment further underscored the importance of ensuring that classification criteria for allocation of quotas must have a rational nexus to their intended objective. It noted that the policy failed to provide any material or rational basis to support the assumption that past exports to specific countries would guarantee better quality or capacity.

As a result of this ruling, the Delhi High Court directed the authorities to re-evaluate the criteria for the allocation of quotas for the export of broken rice.

This judgment has significant implications for the export policy and allocation criteria of commodities in India, reaffirming the principle that such criteria must be just, reasonable, and founded on a rational basis.

In a statement after the ruling, legal experts praised the decision, noting that it reinforced the principles of fairness and equality under the Indian Constitution and ensured that allocation criteria for critical commodities align with their intended objectives.

Date of Decision: 20 October 2023

ASFIVE AGRO PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20-Oct-2023-ASFIVE-AGRO-PRIVATE-LIMITED-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News