Handwriting Expert Opinion Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Without Primary Evidence" – Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Forgery Case Supreme Court Quashes FIR Alleging Rape on False Promise of Marriage After 16-Year Relationship Dowry Deaths Are Not Mere Family Disputes—They Are Heinous Crimes: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Parents-in-Law in Bride's Murder Case Preventive Detention is Not a Tool for Indefinite Incarceration: Supreme Court Quashes Detention Under PITNDPS Act Dying Declaration Requires No Corroboration If Found Trustworthy: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Dying Declaration Must Inspire Confidence and Be Free from Suspicion – Appeared after 20 Days Raised Doubt : Supreme Court Acquits Accused Violation of Court Undertaking Cannot Go Unpunished: Supreme Court Holds Defendants in Contempt Where the Deceased Has Changed Her Stance, Conviction Cannot Rest on an Uncorroborated Dying Declaration: Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Wife’s Murder Case Introduction Mental Capacity, Not Just Age, Determines Legal Consent: Supreme Court Orders Repatriation of Disabled US Citizen to His Mother Eyewitness Testimony of Sterling Quality Cannot Be Disregarded: Supreme Court Affirms Life Sentence in Brutal Murder Case Encumbrance-Free Land for Highway Projects Must Be Handed Over Without Delay – Punjab & Haryana High Court Warns Officials of Strict Action Intention to Insult Must Be Clear and Unambiguous to Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Kerala High Court Efficiency Test Cannot Be Enforced Retrospectively: Rajasthan High Court Strikes Down Common Promotion Exam for Different Recruitment Batches Minimum Sentence Cannot Be Reduced by Courts in Special Statutes” – Delhi High Court Courts Cannot Allow Recall of Witness to Fill Gaps in Cross-Examination: Calcutta High Court A Breach of Promise to Marry Is Not the Same as a False Promise: Bombay High Court Quashes Rape FIR Taxpayers Cannot Demand Special Treatment in Investigations—Administrative Transfers Are Valid: Andhra Pradesh High Court Provisional Attachment Under GST Act Cannot Be Challenged When Due Process is Followed: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Petition When Brothers Reconcile, Justice Must Heal, Not Punish: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Attempted Murder FIR Orissa High Court Dismisses 27-Year-Old Compassionate Appointment Claim, Rules Delay Defeats Purpose of Rehabilitation Scheme

Encumbrance-Free Land for Highway Projects Must Be Handed Over Without Delay – Punjab & Haryana High Court Warns Officials of Strict Action

06 March 2025 6:59 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Infrastructure Development Cannot Be Stalled by Bureaucratic Delays and Unlawful Obstructions - In a strongly worded interim order issued the Punjab & Haryana High Court directed the State of Punjab and all concerned authorities to ensure that encumbrance-free land is handed over to the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) without further delay. The Court, while hearing National Highway Authority of India & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors., emphasized that ongoing highway projects are of national importance and cannot be derailed by administrative inertia, pending litigations, or unlawful interference by third parties.

Observing that the delays were unjustified, the Court ruled that "the execution of crucial infrastructure projects cannot be halted due to unnecessary bureaucratic delays, landowner resistance after compensation is paid, or local interference aimed at stalling progress. It is the duty of the State to ensure seamless and lawful execution of national highway projects."

"Encumbrance-Free Possession Must Be Delivered Without Bureaucratic Delays" – High Court Orders Compliance Without Excuses
The NHAI had approached the Court seeking urgent intervention regarding significant delays in obtaining possession of land required for various ongoing highway projects in Punjab. It cited multiple obstacles, including pending litigation, arbitration disputes, non-compliance with acquisition notifications, and unlawful reoccupation of acquired land.

The Court had earlier issued detailed directions on December 12, 2024, instructing the Chief Secretary, Punjab, the Director General of Police (DGP), and District Collectors to ensure that possession of land is handed over within two months. However, NHAI informed the Court that despite these instructions, a substantial portion of the acquired land remained encumbered, severely affecting the progress of infrastructure projects.

Reaffirming its previous stance, the Court held that "it is imperative that land required for national highway development is handed over to NHAI without any hindrance. Any delays caused by administrative inefficiency or failure to comply with legal provisions will invite strict action against the responsible officers."

"Judicial Stays and Pending Arbitrations Cannot Stall National Projects Indefinitely" – High Court Calls for Swift Resolution of Legal Hurdles
The Court acknowledged that some stretches of land remained inaccessible due to status quo orders issued by various courts and ongoing arbitration disputes under Section 3G of the National Highways Act, 1956. However, it directed that all judicial forums handling such disputes must be approached for an expedited resolution.

"The NHAI must make the quickest efforts to vacate status quo orders that obstruct project completion. Pending litigation cannot be used as an indefinite tool to delay infrastructure development. The respective authorities and judicial forums must prioritize these cases to ensure that work on highways does not suffer unnecessary setbacks," the Court observed.

The Court further directed that all arbitration cases related to land compensation must be concluded within two weeks, and all pending notifications under Sections 3A and 3D of the National Highways Act, 1956, must be issued immediately to remove any remaining legal impediments.

"Unruly Elements Cannot Be Allowed to Obstruct Infrastructure Development" – High Court Directs Police to Take Immediate Action
The NHAI informed the Court that in some areas where encumbrance-free possession had been granted earlier, unlawful elements had attempted to reoccupy the land, obstructing construction activities. Expressing strong disapproval, the Court ruled that "any unlawful encroachments or resistance after land has been duly acquired must be dealt with firmly, and law enforcement agencies must take immediate action against violators."

Observing that such actions directly interfere with national development, the Court directed that if NHAI faces obstruction from individuals or groups attempting to interfere with the project, complaints must be immediately lodged with the respective Police Commissioners, and appropriate legal action must follow.

"The rule of law must prevail. No individual or group can take the law into their own hands by obstructing a legally sanctioned project. The authorities must ensure that development work proceeds smoothly, without fear or favor," the Court ruled.

To ensure effective enforcement, the Court directed the establishment of mobile police vans and permanent police pickets at key project sites to prevent unlawful encroachments and ensure the safety of construction workers and equipment.

"Bureaucratic Inaction Will Not Be Tolerated" – High Court Warns Officers of Consequences for Non-Compliance
Issuing a stern warning to all government officials involved in the land acquisition process, the Court declared that "any further delay in compliance with these orders will invite strict action against the derelicting officers."

"If the next hearing reveals that encumbrance-free land has not been handed over due to administrative inaction, the responsible officers will be held accountable. The Chief Secretary and DGP are personally directed to ensure that all pending land acquisition issues are resolved as per law without further excuses," the Court warned.

Emphasizing that highway projects are crucial for national economic growth and public welfare, the Court observed that "any inefficiency in their execution will not be tolerated, and those responsible for delays will face serious consequences."

"Non-Compliance Will Lead to Personal Liability" – High Court Orders Immediate Execution of Directions
The High Court directed that all remaining encumbrances on acquired land must be cleared within two weeks, pending arbitration and litigation issues must be expedited, and police forces must provide full cooperation to NHAI to prevent unlawful obstructions or encroachments. The Court ordered that district administrations must ensure compliance with land acquisition regulations and hand over possession without further bureaucratic delays.

The Court also directed that a status report must be submitted before the next hearing on March 21, 2025, and warned that "any failure to comply with these directions will result in personal liability for the officers responsible, and contempt proceedings may be initiated if necessary."

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has once again underscored the importance of timely and obstruction-free land acquisition for national infrastructure projects. The Court has sent a strong message that bureaucratic inefficiency, legal hurdles, and unlawful obstructions cannot be used as tools to delay development work.

By directing swift resolution of land acquisition disputes and taking a firm stance against those attempting to stall highway projects, the High Court has reinforced the principle that national infrastructure projects must take precedence over localized disputes and administrative inefficiencies.


Date of Decision: 21 February 2025
 

Similar News