Auction Purchaser Has No Vested Right Without Sale Confirmation: Calcutta HC Upholds Borrower’s Redemption Right Under Pre-Amendment SARFAESI Law Mere Breach of Promise to Marry Doesn’t Amount to Rape: Delhi High Court Acquits Man in False Rape Case Father Is the Natural Guardian After Mother’s Death, Mere Technicalities Cannot Override Welfare of Child: Orissa High Court Restores Custody to Biological Father Assets of Wife and Father-in-Law Can Be Considered in Disproportionate Assets Case Against Public Servant: Kerala High Court Refuses Discharge Identification Without TIP, Electronic Records Without 65B Certificate – Conviction Set Aside: Patna High Court Nothing Inflicts A Deeper Wound On Our Constitutional Culture Than A State Official Running Berserk Regardless Of Human Rights: Jharkhand High Court Orders ₹1.5 Lakh Interim Compensation Dishonour Due to ‘Account Blocked’ Not Attributable to Drawer—No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Cannot Be Rebutted By Mere Assertions: Delhi High Court Affirms Conviction In 32-Year-Old Cheque Bounce Case Signature Alone Doesn’t Prove Debt: Kerala High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case, Rejects Blanket Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Justice Cannot Be Left to Guesswork: Supreme Court Mandates Structured Judgments in Criminal Trials Across India Truth Must Be Proven Beyond Doubt—Not Built On Flawed FIRs, Tainted Witnesses And Investigative Gaps: Supreme Court Acquits Man in POCSO Rape-Murder Case Once parties agree and reconciliation is impossible, a fault-based decree is unnecessary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Divorce on Desertion No Escape from Statutory Ceiling: Exclusive Expenditure by Foreign Head Offices Also Attracts Section 44C Income Tax: Supreme Court Loss Of A Child Cannot Be Calculated In Rupees, But Law Must At Least Offer Dignity In Compensation: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation Sessions Court Cannot Direct Life Imprisonment Till Natural Life Without Remission: Supreme Court Reasserts Limits on Sentencing Powers of Subordinate Courts ‘Continuously Means Without a Single Break’: Supreme Court Bars Expired-and-Renewed Licences From Police Driver Recruitment Chief Justice’s Power Under Section 51(3) Is Independent and Continuing: Supreme Court Upholds Kolhapur Bench Notification Last Seen Evidence Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case No Cultivation on Forest Land Without Central Clearance: Supreme Court Cancels Lease Over 134 Acres, Orders Reforestation Appointment from Rank List Must Respect Communal Rotation: SC Declines Claim of SC Waitlisted Candidate After Resignation of Appointee Supreme Court Dissolves 20-Year Estranged Marriage Under Article 142 Despite Wife’s Objection Murder Inside Temple Cannot Be Treated Lightly: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Father-Son Convicts in Group Killing Case No Notice, No Blacklist: Calcutta High Court Quashes Debarment Over Breach of Natural Justice Prosecution Must Elevate Its Case From Realm Of ‘May Be True’ To Plane Of ‘Must Be True: Orissa High Court Strict Compliance Is the Rule, Not Exception: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Tenant's Plea for Late Deposit of Rent Arrears When Accused Neither Denies Signature Nor Rebuts Presumption, Conviction Must Follow Under Section 138 NI Act: Karnataka High Court A Guardian Who Violates, Forfeits Mercy: Kerala High Court Upholds Natural Life Sentence in Stepfather–POCSO Rape Case Married and Earning Sons Are Legal Representatives Entitled to Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Motor Accident Award to ₹14.81 Lakh Driver Must Stop, Render Aid & Report Accident – Flight from Scene Is an Offence: Madras High Court Convicts Hit-And-Run Accused Under MV Act Delay May Shut the Door, But Justice Cannot Be Locked Out: Gauhati High Court Admits Union of India’s Arbitration Appeal Despite Time-Bar Under Section 30 PC Act | Mere Recovery of Money Is Not Enough—Demand and Acceptance Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Delhi High Court Allahabad High Court Slams Bar Council of U.P. for Ex Parte 10-Year Suspension of Advocate

Encumbrance-Free Land for Highway Projects Must Be Handed Over Without Delay – Punjab & Haryana High Court Warns Officials of Strict Action

06 March 2025 6:59 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Infrastructure Development Cannot Be Stalled by Bureaucratic Delays and Unlawful Obstructions - In a strongly worded interim order issued the Punjab & Haryana High Court directed the State of Punjab and all concerned authorities to ensure that encumbrance-free land is handed over to the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) without further delay. The Court, while hearing National Highway Authority of India & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors., emphasized that ongoing highway projects are of national importance and cannot be derailed by administrative inertia, pending litigations, or unlawful interference by third parties.

Observing that the delays were unjustified, the Court ruled that "the execution of crucial infrastructure projects cannot be halted due to unnecessary bureaucratic delays, landowner resistance after compensation is paid, or local interference aimed at stalling progress. It is the duty of the State to ensure seamless and lawful execution of national highway projects."

"Encumbrance-Free Possession Must Be Delivered Without Bureaucratic Delays" – High Court Orders Compliance Without Excuses
The NHAI had approached the Court seeking urgent intervention regarding significant delays in obtaining possession of land required for various ongoing highway projects in Punjab. It cited multiple obstacles, including pending litigation, arbitration disputes, non-compliance with acquisition notifications, and unlawful reoccupation of acquired land.

The Court had earlier issued detailed directions on December 12, 2024, instructing the Chief Secretary, Punjab, the Director General of Police (DGP), and District Collectors to ensure that possession of land is handed over within two months. However, NHAI informed the Court that despite these instructions, a substantial portion of the acquired land remained encumbered, severely affecting the progress of infrastructure projects.

Reaffirming its previous stance, the Court held that "it is imperative that land required for national highway development is handed over to NHAI without any hindrance. Any delays caused by administrative inefficiency or failure to comply with legal provisions will invite strict action against the responsible officers."

"Judicial Stays and Pending Arbitrations Cannot Stall National Projects Indefinitely" – High Court Calls for Swift Resolution of Legal Hurdles
The Court acknowledged that some stretches of land remained inaccessible due to status quo orders issued by various courts and ongoing arbitration disputes under Section 3G of the National Highways Act, 1956. However, it directed that all judicial forums handling such disputes must be approached for an expedited resolution.

"The NHAI must make the quickest efforts to vacate status quo orders that obstruct project completion. Pending litigation cannot be used as an indefinite tool to delay infrastructure development. The respective authorities and judicial forums must prioritize these cases to ensure that work on highways does not suffer unnecessary setbacks," the Court observed.

The Court further directed that all arbitration cases related to land compensation must be concluded within two weeks, and all pending notifications under Sections 3A and 3D of the National Highways Act, 1956, must be issued immediately to remove any remaining legal impediments.

"Unruly Elements Cannot Be Allowed to Obstruct Infrastructure Development" – High Court Directs Police to Take Immediate Action
The NHAI informed the Court that in some areas where encumbrance-free possession had been granted earlier, unlawful elements had attempted to reoccupy the land, obstructing construction activities. Expressing strong disapproval, the Court ruled that "any unlawful encroachments or resistance after land has been duly acquired must be dealt with firmly, and law enforcement agencies must take immediate action against violators."

Observing that such actions directly interfere with national development, the Court directed that if NHAI faces obstruction from individuals or groups attempting to interfere with the project, complaints must be immediately lodged with the respective Police Commissioners, and appropriate legal action must follow.

"The rule of law must prevail. No individual or group can take the law into their own hands by obstructing a legally sanctioned project. The authorities must ensure that development work proceeds smoothly, without fear or favor," the Court ruled.

To ensure effective enforcement, the Court directed the establishment of mobile police vans and permanent police pickets at key project sites to prevent unlawful encroachments and ensure the safety of construction workers and equipment.

"Bureaucratic Inaction Will Not Be Tolerated" – High Court Warns Officers of Consequences for Non-Compliance
Issuing a stern warning to all government officials involved in the land acquisition process, the Court declared that "any further delay in compliance with these orders will invite strict action against the derelicting officers."

"If the next hearing reveals that encumbrance-free land has not been handed over due to administrative inaction, the responsible officers will be held accountable. The Chief Secretary and DGP are personally directed to ensure that all pending land acquisition issues are resolved as per law without further excuses," the Court warned.

Emphasizing that highway projects are crucial for national economic growth and public welfare, the Court observed that "any inefficiency in their execution will not be tolerated, and those responsible for delays will face serious consequences."

"Non-Compliance Will Lead to Personal Liability" – High Court Orders Immediate Execution of Directions
The High Court directed that all remaining encumbrances on acquired land must be cleared within two weeks, pending arbitration and litigation issues must be expedited, and police forces must provide full cooperation to NHAI to prevent unlawful obstructions or encroachments. The Court ordered that district administrations must ensure compliance with land acquisition regulations and hand over possession without further bureaucratic delays.

The Court also directed that a status report must be submitted before the next hearing on March 21, 2025, and warned that "any failure to comply with these directions will result in personal liability for the officers responsible, and contempt proceedings may be initiated if necessary."

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has once again underscored the importance of timely and obstruction-free land acquisition for national infrastructure projects. The Court has sent a strong message that bureaucratic inefficiency, legal hurdles, and unlawful obstructions cannot be used as tools to delay development work.

By directing swift resolution of land acquisition disputes and taking a firm stance against those attempting to stall highway projects, the High Court has reinforced the principle that national infrastructure projects must take precedence over localized disputes and administrative inefficiencies.


Date of Decision: 21 February 2025
 

Latest Legal News