POCSO Presumption Is Not a Dead Letter, But ‘Sterling Witness’ Test Still Governs Conviction: Bombay High Court High Courts Cannot Routinely Entertain Contempt Petitions Beyond One Year: Madras High Court Declines Contempt Plea Filed After Four Years Courts Cannot Reject Suit by Weighing Evidence at Threshold: Delhi High Court Restores Discrimination Suit by Indian Staff Against Italian Embassy Improvised Testimonies and Dubious Recovery Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Sale with Repurchase Condition is Not a Mortgage: Bombay High Court Reverses Redemption Decree After 27-Year Delay Second Transfer Application on Same Grounds is Not Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Legal Position under Section 24 CPC Custodial Interrogation Is Not Punitive — Arrest Cannot Be Used as a Tool to Humiliate in Corporate Offence Allegations: Delhi High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Partnership Act | Eviction Suit by Unregistered Firm Maintainable if Based on Statutory Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Reasonable Grounds Under Section 37 of NDPS Act Cannot Be Equated with Proof; They Must Reflect More Than Suspicion, But Less Than Conviction: J&K HC Apprehension to Life Is a Just Ground for Transfer When Roots Lie in History of Ideological Violence: Bombay High Court Transfers Defamation Suits Against Hamid Dabholkar, Nikhil Wagle From Goa to Maharashtra Violation of Income Tax Law Doesn’t Void Cheque Bounce Offence: Supreme Court Overrules Kerala HC, Says Section 138 NI Act Stands Independent Overstaying Licensee Cannot Evade Double Damages by Legal Technicalities: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Is Not a Stamp of Truth: Punjab & Haryana High Court Trademark Law Must Protect Reputation, Not Reward Delay Tactics: Bombay High Court Grants Injunction to FedEx Against Dishonest Use of Its Well-Known Mark Commercial Dispute Need Not Wait for a Written Contract: Delhi High Court Upholds Rs.6 Lakh Decree in Rent Recovery Suit Against Storage Defaulter Limitation Begins From Refusal, Not Date of Agreement—Especially When Title Was Under Litigation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sale by Karta of Ancestral Property Without Legal Necessity Is Voidable, Not Void: Madras High Court Dismisses Sons’ Appeal Demand for Gold at 'Chhoochhak' Ceremony Not Dowry – Demand Must Connected With Marriage: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claims Cannot Be Decided on Sympathy – Involvement of Offending Vehicle Must Be Proved: Supreme Court Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Ladder for Career Advancement – It Ends Once Exercised: Supreme Court In Absence of Minimum Fee, Compounding by Revenue Officials Is Not Criminal Misconduct: Kerala High Court Clarifies Power, Quashes FIR Against Two Accused If You’re in Service on 31st March, You Get the Revised Pay: Supreme Court Affirms Right to 2017 Pay Revision for March 2016 Retirees Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court

Delhi High Court Grants Dynamic Injunction to Star India Against Rogue Websites Streaming T20 World Cup

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


"The need for immediate relief is particularly pressing": Court Protects Star India's Media Rights for ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2024

Introduction:

The Delhi High Court has issued a dynamic injunction to protect Star India Private Limited's exclusive media rights for the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2024 from unauthorized streaming by rogue websites. The judgment, delivered by Justice Sanjeev Narula, underscores the need for real-time measures to prevent illegal dissemination of the T20 World Cup matches, emphasizing the significant financial and intellectual property rights at stake.

Background:

Star India Private Limited, which holds exclusive digital and television broadcasting rights for ICC events from 2024 to 2027, filed a suit against several rogue betting websites accused of illegal streaming of live sporting events. The plaintiff, represented by Ms. Sneha Jain and her team, sought an injunction to protect their rights amid the imminent T20 World Cup, scheduled to run from June 2, 2024, to June 29, 2024.

Court Observations and Views:

Urgency and Significance of ICC Events:

The court acknowledged the high stakes involved, noting, "The widespread appeal and significance of the ICC Events, particularly in the Indian subcontinent, necessitate stringent measures to safeguard the Plaintiff’s investment and intellectual property rights." The plaintiff's substantial financial investment in acquiring these rights was emphasized, with the court recognizing the potential for significant financial losses and irreparable harm if unauthorized streaming were allowed.

Dynamic Nature of the Injunction:

Justice Narula highlighted the evolving nature of digital piracy, stating, "The dynamic and ever-evolving nature of the digital landscape necessitates that court orders are not static but evolve in tandem with technological advancements and challenges posed by the virtual domain." The court's proactive approach aims to address the challenges of digital piracy effectively, ensuring that intellectual property rights are enforceable in the fast-paced internet environment.

Legal Basis and Precedents:

The judgment referenced prior cases and legal principles to substantiate the need for a dynamic injunction. It cited the Supreme Court judgment in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Krithi and the Universal City Studios LLC v. Dotmovies.baby case, which emphasized the necessity of adaptive legal measures to protect against the instant monetary loss caused by digital piracy. "The injunction ought to not merely extend to past content but also to content generated on a day-to-day basis by the Plaintiffs," the court noted, underscoring the importance of timely legal remedies.

Quotes from the Judgment:

Justice Narula remarked, "The unauthorized use of these elements not only affects the financial returns but also infringes upon the copyright protections accorded to the broadcast content. It is thus imperative to recognize the legal rights associated with the creation and dissemination of this content."

Conclusion: The Delhi High Court's decision to grant a dynamic injunction ensures robust protection for Star India's exclusive broadcasting rights for the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2024. By allowing real-time measures to block unauthorized streaming, the court has set a significant precedent in safeguarding intellectual property rights in the digital age. The judgment highlights the judiciary's commitment to adapting legal remedies to contemporary challenges, ensuring that the substantial investments made by content owners are protected against the pervasive threat of digital piracy.

 

Date of Decision: May 30, 2024

Star India Private Limited v. Magicwin.games & Ors.

Latest Legal News