Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Completing a Service Year with Good Conduct Cannot be Overlooked: Gujarat High Court Recognizes Right to Increment for Retirees

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a pivotal judgment, the Gujarat High Court, under the guidance of Honourable Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee, has affirmed the right of government servants to receive an annual increment due on July 1st, even if their retirement falls on June 30th. This decision aligns with the principles established by the Supreme Court and other High Courts, addressing a critical concern for retirees regarding their increments.

Justice Mayee, in his oral order, highlighted the importance of recognizing the service year completed with good conduct by the retirees. He remarked, "The increment is earned for rendering service with good conduct in a year/specified period. Therefore, the moment a government servant has rendered service for a specified period with good conduct, in a time scale, he is entitled to the annual increment."

The case involved the Nagar Prathmik Shikshan Samiti Karmachari Pensioners Mandal against the State of Gujarat, where the petitioners, mostly retirees of June 30th across several years, sought justice for being denied the increment due on the following July 1st.

Drawing upon the precedent set by the Supreme Court in the case of Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL v. C. P. Mundinamani and Ors., the Gujarat High Court upheld that "the entitlement to receive an increment crystallizes when the government servant completes the requisite length of service with good conduct and becomes payable on the succeeding day."

Following this landmark decision, the Gujarat High Court has directed the concerned authorities to revise the pension and other retirement benefits of the petitioners accordingly. This ruling is a significant stride in acknowledging the rights of government employees to the benefits they have earned through their dedicated service.

Date: 22/01/2024

NAGAR PRATHMIK SHIKSHAN SAMITI KARMACHARI PENSIONERS MANDAL VS STATE OF GUJARAT

 

Latest Legal News