Unregistered Agreement Of Sale Entered Before Attachment Cannot Defeat Decree-Holder’s Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court No Presumption That Joint Family Possesses Joint Property; Female Hindu Absolute Owner Of Property Purchased In Her Name: Allahabad High Court Age Determination Must Strictly Follow Hierarchy Of Documents Under JJ Act: Orissa High Court Acquits Man Of POCSO Charges Once 'C' Form Declarations Are Signed, Burden Shifts To Buyer To Prove Payment Of Outstanding Dues: Madras High Court Section 213 Succession Act No Bar To Eviction Suit If Claim Is Based On Landlord-Tenant Relationship, Not Title Under Will: Bombay High Court Meritorious Candidate Wrongfully Denied Appointment Entitled To Notional Seniority & Old Pension Scheme: J&K & Ladakh High Court 6-Year Delay In Propounding Will & Hostile Attesting Witness Constitute 'Grave Suspicious Circumstances': Delhi High Court Refuses Probate Section 319 CrPC Power Cannot Be Exercised Based On FIR Or Section 161 Statements: Allahabad High Court Quashes Summoning Of Unmarried Sisters Bail Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Recovery Proceedings; Court Can't Order Sale Of Accused's Property: Supreme Court Able-Bodied Husband Cannot Defeat Maintenance Claim By Projecting Income Below Minimum Wages: Delhi High Court Recording Section 313 CrPC Statement Before Cross-Examination Of Prosecution Witness Does Not Vitiate Trial: Karnataka High Court Murder By Unknown Assailants Is Not 'Accidental Death' Under Mukhymantri Kisan Bima Yojna: Allahabad High Court Section 311 CrPC | Court Not A Passive Bystander, Must Summon Material Witness If Essential For Just Decision: Rajasthan High Court GST Act Does Not Prima Facie Prohibit Consolidated Show-Cause Notices For Multiple Years: Bombay HC Refers Issue To Larger Bench 90% Burn Injuries No Bar To Making Statement; Dying Declaration Can Be Sole Basis For Conviction If Found Truthful: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Claim Petition by One Legal Representative Is Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rebukes Tribunal for Dismissing Compensation Plea on Ground of Non-joinder of Married Daughter

18 May 2025 5:43 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


“Non-impleadment of a party would not be a ground for rejection of the claim petition” — Punjab and Haryana High Court emphatically held that a compensation petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act cannot be dismissed merely because all legal representatives of the deceased are not impleaded.

Allowing the appeal filed by Salinder Singh, son of the deceased Pyara Singh, Justice Alka Sarin set aside the rejection of the claim by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra, terming the approach “legally unsustainable” and “contrary to settled law.”

“A claim petition can be filed by all or any one of the legal representatives of the deceased”

The trial court had dismissed the claim solely on the ground that the married daughter of the deceased had not been made a party. Justice Sarin noted that such reasoning flies in the face of the Motor Vehicles Act, particularly Section 166(1)(c), which expressly allows:

“...an application for compensation arising out of an accident... may be made by... all or any of the legal representatives of the deceased...”

She quoted approvingly from the Supreme Court judgment in Janabai & Ors. vs. M/s ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., 2022 (4) RCR (Civil) 85, where it was observed:

“If the daughters of the deceased have not been impleaded as claimants, it is immaterial… It is not really of any consequence as held by the High Court.”

The High Court underlined that the dismissal of the petition was unjustified when the other connected case related to the same accident had already resulted in a finding of liability against the insurance company.

“The impugned award passed by the Tribunal cannot be sustained”

Noting that the Tribunal had completely failed to consider the merits of the claim, the High Court set aside the order and remanded the case:

“The matter is remanded to the Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra for adjudication on merits in accordance with law.”

The Court also directed both parties to appear before the Tribunal on 20.05.2025 and emphasized that the petition should now be adjudicated expeditiously.

Date of Decision: 05.05.2025

Latest Legal News