No Arbitration Agreement, No Arbitrator: Supreme Court Voids Award Made Without Municipal Council's Consent, Calls Entire Proceedings "Coram Non Judice" Post-Disposal Miscellaneous Applications Maintainable Only In Rare Situations; Court Becomes Functus Officio After SLP Dismissal: Supreme Court Vague & Omnibus Allegations Against Relatives In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Nipped In The Bud; 7-Year Delay In FIR Fatal: Supreme Court State Can Withdraw Electricity Duty Exemption For Captive Power Plants In Public Interest But Must Give One-Year Notice Period: Supreme Court DSC Personnel Entitled To Second Pension; Shortfall In Service Up To 12 Months Can Be Condoned: Supreme Court Person Professing Christianity Cannot Claim Scheduled Caste Status To Invoke SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Except Matters One May, But Exclude Justice One Cannot: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Holds State Cannot Be Judge In Its Own Cause On Disputed Breach When State Requisitions Your Vehicle For Elections And It Kills Someone, The State Pays — Not Your Insurer: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Financial Burden Cannot Defeat Constitutional Right to Just Compensation: Supreme Court Unsigned Charge Is A Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial Unless 'Failure Of Justice' Is Shown: Supreme Court Tenant Files Fresh Petition Before Rent Authority After Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Review And Misc Application — Court Calls It "Gross Abuse of Process", Voids Restoration Order Taxation Law | Exemption For Naphtha Depends On 'Intended Use' At Procurement, Not Actual Exclusive Use: Supreme Court Army's Own Grading System Worked Against Women Officers For Years — Supreme Court Grants Permanent Commission, Pension To Short Service Women Officers

Claim Petition by One Legal Representative Is Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rebukes Tribunal for Dismissing Compensation Plea on Ground of Non-joinder of Married Daughter

18 May 2025 5:43 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


“Non-impleadment of a party would not be a ground for rejection of the claim petition” — Punjab and Haryana High Court emphatically held that a compensation petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act cannot be dismissed merely because all legal representatives of the deceased are not impleaded.

Allowing the appeal filed by Salinder Singh, son of the deceased Pyara Singh, Justice Alka Sarin set aside the rejection of the claim by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra, terming the approach “legally unsustainable” and “contrary to settled law.”

“A claim petition can be filed by all or any one of the legal representatives of the deceased”

The trial court had dismissed the claim solely on the ground that the married daughter of the deceased had not been made a party. Justice Sarin noted that such reasoning flies in the face of the Motor Vehicles Act, particularly Section 166(1)(c), which expressly allows:

“...an application for compensation arising out of an accident... may be made by... all or any of the legal representatives of the deceased...”

She quoted approvingly from the Supreme Court judgment in Janabai & Ors. vs. M/s ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., 2022 (4) RCR (Civil) 85, where it was observed:

“If the daughters of the deceased have not been impleaded as claimants, it is immaterial… It is not really of any consequence as held by the High Court.”

The High Court underlined that the dismissal of the petition was unjustified when the other connected case related to the same accident had already resulted in a finding of liability against the insurance company.

“The impugned award passed by the Tribunal cannot be sustained”

Noting that the Tribunal had completely failed to consider the merits of the claim, the High Court set aside the order and remanded the case:

“The matter is remanded to the Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra for adjudication on merits in accordance with law.”

The Court also directed both parties to appear before the Tribunal on 20.05.2025 and emphasized that the petition should now be adjudicated expeditiously.

Date of Decision: 05.05.2025

Latest Legal News