Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Calcutta High Court Upholds Right to Partition Based on Documentary Evidence of Paternity

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking ruling, the judiciary has reaffirmed the significance of documentary evidence in determining familial relationships in partition suits. The judgment, delivered by Justice Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury on October 19, 2023, sets a precedent for similar cases by emphasizing the importance of credible documentation over oral testimony.

The case revolved around a partition suit concerning the ownership of a property. The plaintiff claimed to be the biological son of the original owner and sought a share in the property, which the defendants vehemently opposed, denying any such relationship. The trial court initially dismissed the suit, but the first appellate court reversed this decision, acknowledging the plaintiff's claim.

Justice Chowdhury's observation in the judgment highlights the pivotal role of Section 50 of the Indian Evidence Act, which pertains to opinions on relationships. The court noted, "Opinion on the relationship between individuals is admissible under Section 50 of the Indian Evidence Act, and in this case, it is crucial to consider the documentary evidence presented."

The crux of the judgment lies in the burden of proof. The plaintiff supported their claim with a wealth of documentary evidence, including school records and birth certificates, all pointing to a father-son relationship with the original owner. On the other hand, the defendants relied solely on oral testimony, which the court found insufficient to counter the substantial probative value of the documentary evidence.

In upholding the judgment of the first appellate court, Justice Chowdhury affirmed the plaintiff's right to partition, setting a precedent that emphasizes the primacy of documented evidence in such cases.

This decision draws parallels to several prior cases and legal principles, reinforcing the importance of credible documentation in establishing familial relationships. Advocates representing the parties in this case, including Mr. Prantick Ghosh, drew from legal precedents such as DOL GOBINDA PARICHA VS. NIMAI CHARAN MISHRA, among others, to bolster their arguments.

Date of Decision: 19th October 2023

MINATI BHADRA & ORS.  vs   DILIP KR. BHADRA & ORS.       

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/19_October_2023-Minati_Bhadra_Ors_vs_Dilip_Kr_Bhadra_Ors.pdf"]

Latest Legal News