MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Kerala High Court Releases Young Woman Accused in Kidnapping Case

23 December 2024 6:55 PM

By: sayum


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has granted bail to Anupama Padmakumar, a 22-year-old accused in a high-profile kidnapping case. The judgment, delivered by Justice C.S. Dias, emphasized that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, particularly in the context of women and young accused individuals. The court highlighted the importance of personal liberty and the presumption of innocence, while also setting stringent conditions to ensure the accused's compliance.

The petitioner, Anupama Padmakumar, was the third accused in Crime No. 1596/2023 of Pooyapally Police Station, Kollam. She, along with her parents, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including kidnapping and conspiracy, as well as provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act. The prosecution alleged that the family, facing severe financial distress, conspired to kidnap a six-year-old girl for ransom. On November 27, 2023, the child was abducted and subsequently confined in the family's house. The victim was later abandoned at Asramam ground following police intervention.

The court acknowledged the gravity of the charges, noting the detailed and serious nature of the allegations against Anupama and her parents. The prosecution presented evidence, including a notebook detailing the kidnapping plan and CCTV footage linking the accused to the crime.

Justice Dias extensively referenced precedents from the Supreme Court, reiterating the principle that bail should not be withheld as a form of punishment. He cited the landmark rulings in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI and Sheikh Javed Iqbal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which stress the significance of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court noted, "Deprivation of liberty must be considered a punishment, unless it is required to ensure that an accused person will stand his trial when called upon."

The judgment emphasized the need for sensitivity when dealing with female accused, particularly young women. Justice Dias remarked on the adverse effects of prolonged incarceration on women and their families, especially in cases where the accused are primary caregivers.

Justice Dias underscored the judicial responsibility to uphold the principles of bail: "The presumption of innocence is a fundamental right that must be preserved. It is imperative that the judiciary remains mindful of the delicate balance between safeguarding society and ensuring the rights of the accused."

The Kerala High Court's decision to grant bail to Anupama Padmakumar underscores a critical aspect of the Indian judicial system: the commitment to uphold personal liberty and the presumption of innocence. This ruling is expected to influence future bail considerations, particularly in cases involving young and female accused. By affirming the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is the exception," the court has reinforced the importance of constitutional rights and judicial prudence in the face of serious allegations.

Date of Decision: July 29, 2024

Latest Legal News