Possession and Part Performance: Stamp Duty Compliance Is Non-Negotiable, Says Delhi High Court Calcutta High Court Declares Disciplinary Action as ‘Shockingly Disproportionate’, Orders Reduction in Rank for Petitioner No Profits, No Deduction — Section 33AC Must Precede 80-I Calculation in Shipping Tax Disputes: Bombay High Court Equity and Merit Must Coexist: Kerala High Court Rules on Regularisation of Temporary Forest Department Employees Lawyers Have No Right to Strike: Madras High Court in Contempt Case Encroachment is like committing a 'dacoity' against public resources: Delhi High Court. High Court Rejects Plea of Kindergarten School Against ESI Contribution Assessment Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Proceedings Citing 'Humanitarian Consideration' After Accused Marries Victim Procedural Delays Do Not Justify Condonation of Delay," Rules Delhi Consumer Commission in National Insurance Case Elements of Section 300 IPC Are Not Made Out: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Murder Conviction in 1987 Beating Case Registrar Cannot Be a Judge of His Own Cause: Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes Amendments MP High Court Upholds Prosecution for Forged Patta: 'Accountability in Public Office is Non-Negotiable Approval Must Be Granted for Altruistic Kidney Donations," Rules Madras High Court Grave Illegality in Appellate Remand: High Court of Rajasthan Orders Reassessment on Merits Commissioner Lacked Authority for Retrospective Cancellation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Educational Trusts' Registrations Intent is Crucial in Violent Crimes: Single Blow with Axe Does Not Imply Attempt to Murder," Rules Madhya Pradesh High Court

Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Kerala High Court Releases Young Woman Accused in Kidnapping Case

23 December 2024 6:55 PM

By: sayum


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has granted bail to Anupama Padmakumar, a 22-year-old accused in a high-profile kidnapping case. The judgment, delivered by Justice C.S. Dias, emphasized that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, particularly in the context of women and young accused individuals. The court highlighted the importance of personal liberty and the presumption of innocence, while also setting stringent conditions to ensure the accused's compliance.

The petitioner, Anupama Padmakumar, was the third accused in Crime No. 1596/2023 of Pooyapally Police Station, Kollam. She, along with her parents, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including kidnapping and conspiracy, as well as provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act. The prosecution alleged that the family, facing severe financial distress, conspired to kidnap a six-year-old girl for ransom. On November 27, 2023, the child was abducted and subsequently confined in the family's house. The victim was later abandoned at Asramam ground following police intervention.

The court acknowledged the gravity of the charges, noting the detailed and serious nature of the allegations against Anupama and her parents. The prosecution presented evidence, including a notebook detailing the kidnapping plan and CCTV footage linking the accused to the crime.

Justice Dias extensively referenced precedents from the Supreme Court, reiterating the principle that bail should not be withheld as a form of punishment. He cited the landmark rulings in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI and Sheikh Javed Iqbal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which stress the significance of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court noted, "Deprivation of liberty must be considered a punishment, unless it is required to ensure that an accused person will stand his trial when called upon."

The judgment emphasized the need for sensitivity when dealing with female accused, particularly young women. Justice Dias remarked on the adverse effects of prolonged incarceration on women and their families, especially in cases where the accused are primary caregivers.

Justice Dias underscored the judicial responsibility to uphold the principles of bail: "The presumption of innocence is a fundamental right that must be preserved. It is imperative that the judiciary remains mindful of the delicate balance between safeguarding society and ensuring the rights of the accused."

The Kerala High Court's decision to grant bail to Anupama Padmakumar underscores a critical aspect of the Indian judicial system: the commitment to uphold personal liberty and the presumption of innocence. This ruling is expected to influence future bail considerations, particularly in cases involving young and female accused. By affirming the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is the exception," the court has reinforced the importance of constitutional rights and judicial prudence in the face of serious allegations.

Date of Decision: July 29, 2024

Similar News