State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 License Fee on Hoardings is Regulatory, Not Tax; GST Does Not Bar Municipal Levy: Bombay High Court Filing Forged Bank Statement to Mislead Court in Maintenance Case Is Prima Facie Offence Under Section 466 IPC: Allahabad High Court Upholds Summoning Continued Cruelty and Concealment of Infertility Justify Divorce: Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Divorce Disguising Punishment as Simplicity Is Abuse of Power: Delhi High Court Quashes Dismissals of Civil Defence Volunteers for Being Stigmatic, Not Simpliciter Marriage Cannot Be Perpetuated on Paper When Cohabitation Has Ceased for Decades: Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Grant Divorce Despite Wife’s Opposition Ownership of Trucks Does Not Mean Windfall Compensation: Supreme Court Slashes Inflated Motor Accident Award in Absence of Documentary Proof Concealment of Mortgage Is Fraud, Not a Technical Omission: Supreme Court Restores Refund Decree, Slams High Court’s Remand State Reorganization Does Not Automatically Convert Cooperative Societies into Multi-State Entities: Supreme Court Rejects Blanket Interpretation of Section 103 Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication

Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Kerala High Court Releases Young Woman Accused in Kidnapping Case

23 December 2024 6:55 PM

By: sayum


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has granted bail to Anupama Padmakumar, a 22-year-old accused in a high-profile kidnapping case. The judgment, delivered by Justice C.S. Dias, emphasized that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, particularly in the context of women and young accused individuals. The court highlighted the importance of personal liberty and the presumption of innocence, while also setting stringent conditions to ensure the accused's compliance.

The petitioner, Anupama Padmakumar, was the third accused in Crime No. 1596/2023 of Pooyapally Police Station, Kollam. She, along with her parents, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including kidnapping and conspiracy, as well as provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act. The prosecution alleged that the family, facing severe financial distress, conspired to kidnap a six-year-old girl for ransom. On November 27, 2023, the child was abducted and subsequently confined in the family's house. The victim was later abandoned at Asramam ground following police intervention.

The court acknowledged the gravity of the charges, noting the detailed and serious nature of the allegations against Anupama and her parents. The prosecution presented evidence, including a notebook detailing the kidnapping plan and CCTV footage linking the accused to the crime.

Justice Dias extensively referenced precedents from the Supreme Court, reiterating the principle that bail should not be withheld as a form of punishment. He cited the landmark rulings in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI and Sheikh Javed Iqbal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which stress the significance of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court noted, "Deprivation of liberty must be considered a punishment, unless it is required to ensure that an accused person will stand his trial when called upon."

The judgment emphasized the need for sensitivity when dealing with female accused, particularly young women. Justice Dias remarked on the adverse effects of prolonged incarceration on women and their families, especially in cases where the accused are primary caregivers.

Justice Dias underscored the judicial responsibility to uphold the principles of bail: "The presumption of innocence is a fundamental right that must be preserved. It is imperative that the judiciary remains mindful of the delicate balance between safeguarding society and ensuring the rights of the accused."

The Kerala High Court's decision to grant bail to Anupama Padmakumar underscores a critical aspect of the Indian judicial system: the commitment to uphold personal liberty and the presumption of innocence. This ruling is expected to influence future bail considerations, particularly in cases involving young and female accused. By affirming the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is the exception," the court has reinforced the importance of constitutional rights and judicial prudence in the face of serious allegations.

Date of Decision: July 29, 2024

Latest Legal News