"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

"Abject Failure" in Implementing POCSO Laws: Bombay High Court Overturns Lenient Sentencing in Child Sexual Assault Case

05 September 2024 5:18 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court, presided over by Justice Bharati Dangre, critiqued the flaws in implementing the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. Describing it as an "abject failure" on the part of prosecution and presiding judges, the court overturned a lower court's sentence.

The case involved an accused, Rodu Bhaga Wagh, convicted for attempting to sexually assault a 10-year-old girl. He had been sentenced to just three years of rigorous imprisonment by the Special Judge, which drew strong criticism for being lesser than the minimum prescribed punishment under the POCSO Act.

Justice Dangre pointed out that "It is not open to a Court to impose a punishment lesser than the minimum that is prescribed...in no case, the punishment could have been restricted to 3 years of rigorous imprisonment."

The judgment specifically highlighted that neither the Special Public Prosecutor nor the lower court had paid heed to the mandatory sentencing provisions under the Act. "The prosecution and the Judges presiding over the POCSO cases are expected to be conversant with the provisions of the special enactment," said Justice Dangre.

Justice Dangre observed that there was an "abject failure" to notice the glaring flaws in the punishment imposed. The judge further added, "The State and the Special Public Prosecutor continue to act mute spectators to the flawed implementation of the legislation, which is specifically intended to protect the children."

The case is likely to have an immediate impact on how POCSO cases are tried and sentenced. Legal experts believe that this ruling will serve as a strong deterrent to lax implementation of the laws designed to protect minors from sexual assault.

The High Court's observations have also intensified the ongoing conversation surrounding the efficiency and effectiveness of Special Courts and Prosecutors in handling POCSO cases.

Experts suggest that this judgment will serve as a wake-up call for authorities involved in the implementation of the POCSO Act. It emphasizes the need for rigorous adherence to the law, particularly when it comes to sentencing offenders in such sensitive cases.

Date of Decision: 5 September, 2023

Rodu Bhaga Wagh vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Similar News