Motor Insurance Policy Covers Cross-Border Travel If Specifically Authorized By Valid Permit Under MVA: Supreme Court Petrol Pumps Act As 'Commission Agents' For Mahanagar Gas, Liable To Pay Service Tax Under Business Auxiliary Service: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Dilute 'Bangalore Water Supply' Ratio, Affirms Worker Protection Remains The Core Of Industrial Disputes Act Order XXII Rule 9(3) CPC | Application Under Section 5 Limitation Act Must Be Filed Separately To Condonate Delay In Setting Aside Abatement: Supreme Court Principle Of Parity | Supreme Court Extends Benefit Of Fixed-Term Sentence To Co-Accused Based On Remission Period Right To Catch Fish Amounts To 'Profit à Prendre' And Is Compulsorily Registrable As A Lease Under Section 17(1)(d) Registration Act: Supreme Court Supreme Court Mandates Adoption Of Guidelines To Inculcate Sensitivity And Compassion In Judicial Processes For Sexual Offences 'Last Seen' Circumstance Is Weak Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused PSEB | Pre-Regularization Service Must Be Counted As Qualifying Service For Pensionary Benefits: Supreme Court Writ Of Quo Warranto Cannot Be Used For Redress Of Personal Grievances By Unsuccessful Candidates In Selection Process: Supreme Court 'Case Of No Investigation': Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Citing 'Shoddy' Police Work And Lack Of Forensic Evidence 'Status Quo Cannot Be Vacated Without Appropriate Security': Supreme Court Directs Additional ₹200 Crores Deposit In RAKIA-Matrix Case SARFAESI Act | 'Bank' As Assignee Can Invoke Recovery Measures Even If Debt Was Originally Created By Non-Notified Financial Institution: Supreme Court 'CBI Failed Miserably': Supreme Court Tears Into 'Fabricated' Case, Acquits Bank Manager In 35-Year-Old Corruption Trial Mere Delay In Tax Deposit Cannot Be Equated With Non-Payment: Supreme Court Quashes Penalty On Saudi Arabian Airlines Revisional Power Under Section 56 Karnataka Land Revenue Act Cannot Be Invoked Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period: Supreme Court Prosecution Can’t Use Known Locations To Create 'Discovery' Fiction: Supreme Court Rejects Site Plan As Evidence Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage And Long-Term Separation Constitute Valid Grounds For Divorce Under Section 13(1)(ib) HMA: Supreme Court 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Is A Guideline And Not A Fetish': Supreme Court Acquits Man In 2007 Murder Case Over Fragile Circumstantial Evidence Plea Of Juvenility Is A Jurisdictional Fact; High Court Must Recall Final Judgments Under Section 482 CrPC To Remedy Miscarriage Of Justice: Supreme Court SEBI | Professional Clearing Members Have No Statutory Obligation To Verify Credit/Debit Positions Of Individual Clients Of Trading Members: Supreme Court

"Abject Failure" in Implementing POCSO Laws: Bombay High Court Overturns Lenient Sentencing in Child Sexual Assault Case

05 September 2024 5:18 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court, presided over by Justice Bharati Dangre, critiqued the flaws in implementing the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. Describing it as an "abject failure" on the part of prosecution and presiding judges, the court overturned a lower court's sentence.

The case involved an accused, Rodu Bhaga Wagh, convicted for attempting to sexually assault a 10-year-old girl. He had been sentenced to just three years of rigorous imprisonment by the Special Judge, which drew strong criticism for being lesser than the minimum prescribed punishment under the POCSO Act.

Justice Dangre pointed out that "It is not open to a Court to impose a punishment lesser than the minimum that is prescribed...in no case, the punishment could have been restricted to 3 years of rigorous imprisonment."

The judgment specifically highlighted that neither the Special Public Prosecutor nor the lower court had paid heed to the mandatory sentencing provisions under the Act. "The prosecution and the Judges presiding over the POCSO cases are expected to be conversant with the provisions of the special enactment," said Justice Dangre.

Justice Dangre observed that there was an "abject failure" to notice the glaring flaws in the punishment imposed. The judge further added, "The State and the Special Public Prosecutor continue to act mute spectators to the flawed implementation of the legislation, which is specifically intended to protect the children."

The case is likely to have an immediate impact on how POCSO cases are tried and sentenced. Legal experts believe that this ruling will serve as a strong deterrent to lax implementation of the laws designed to protect minors from sexual assault.

The High Court's observations have also intensified the ongoing conversation surrounding the efficiency and effectiveness of Special Courts and Prosecutors in handling POCSO cases.

Experts suggest that this judgment will serve as a wake-up call for authorities involved in the implementation of the POCSO Act. It emphasizes the need for rigorous adherence to the law, particularly when it comes to sentencing offenders in such sensitive cases.

Date of Decision: 5 September, 2023

Rodu Bhaga Wagh vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Latest Legal News