MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

"Abject Failure" in Implementing POCSO Laws: Bombay High Court Overturns Lenient Sentencing in Child Sexual Assault Case

05 September 2024 5:18 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court, presided over by Justice Bharati Dangre, critiqued the flaws in implementing the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. Describing it as an "abject failure" on the part of prosecution and presiding judges, the court overturned a lower court's sentence.

The case involved an accused, Rodu Bhaga Wagh, convicted for attempting to sexually assault a 10-year-old girl. He had been sentenced to just three years of rigorous imprisonment by the Special Judge, which drew strong criticism for being lesser than the minimum prescribed punishment under the POCSO Act.

Justice Dangre pointed out that "It is not open to a Court to impose a punishment lesser than the minimum that is prescribed...in no case, the punishment could have been restricted to 3 years of rigorous imprisonment."

The judgment specifically highlighted that neither the Special Public Prosecutor nor the lower court had paid heed to the mandatory sentencing provisions under the Act. "The prosecution and the Judges presiding over the POCSO cases are expected to be conversant with the provisions of the special enactment," said Justice Dangre.

Justice Dangre observed that there was an "abject failure" to notice the glaring flaws in the punishment imposed. The judge further added, "The State and the Special Public Prosecutor continue to act mute spectators to the flawed implementation of the legislation, which is specifically intended to protect the children."

The case is likely to have an immediate impact on how POCSO cases are tried and sentenced. Legal experts believe that this ruling will serve as a strong deterrent to lax implementation of the laws designed to protect minors from sexual assault.

The High Court's observations have also intensified the ongoing conversation surrounding the efficiency and effectiveness of Special Courts and Prosecutors in handling POCSO cases.

Experts suggest that this judgment will serve as a wake-up call for authorities involved in the implementation of the POCSO Act. It emphasizes the need for rigorous adherence to the law, particularly when it comes to sentencing offenders in such sensitive cases.

Date of Decision: 5 September, 2023

Rodu Bhaga Wagh vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Latest Legal News