(1)
M/S. RAJASTHAN ART EMPORIUM …. APPELLANT Vs.
KUWAIT AIRWAYS & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS D.D
09/11/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Consumer Disputes - Compensation for Delay in Delivery - Complaint against Kuwait Airways for delay in delivering consignments of handicraft goods - Appellant is an exporter who sent shipments to the USA - Goods were not delivered as per the schedule, causing significant delay - Appellant filed a complaint seeking compensation - NCDRC initially awarded compensation for loss of goods - Appeal led t...
(2)
SAJEEV …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE OF KERALA …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
09/11/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Conspiracy and Supply of Poisonous Substance – Alcohol Poisoning Incident – Conviction of Sajeev (A10) and Roy (A11) under Sections 302, 307, 326 read with Section 120B of IPC, and Sections 55(a), (h), (i), and 57 (A)(1)(ii) of the Abkari Act – Incident involving alcohol poisoning resulting in deaths and severe injuries – Accused found guilty of mixing methyl alcohol with s...
(3)
THANESAR SINGH SODHI (D) THR. LRS. …APPELLANTS Vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. …RESPONDENTS D.D
09/11/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Forfeiture of Properties under SAFEMA – Challenging the High Court's order upholding forfeiture under The Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (SAFEMA) – Appeals in Civil Appeal No.5500 of 2011 and Criminal Appeal No.730 of 2014 dismissed – Provisions of SAFEMA applicable despite revocation of detention order under COFEPOSA. [Para 1, ...
(4)
BALARAM …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
08/11/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeal – Challenge to judgment of High Court – Dismissal of appeal and confirmation of trial court's judgment – Conviction of appellant for offences under Sections 148, 302 read with Section 149, and Section 307 of the IPC – Appellant's co-accused Rameshwar deceased – Appeal of the appellant against his conviction – Rameshwar's appeal abated...
(5)
PRABHATBHAI AATABHAI DABHI …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE OF GUJARAT …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
08/11/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Extra-Judicial Confession – Doubt over Confession’s Credibility – Extra-judicial confession to the brother and acquaintance of the deceased, raising questions on its believability, leading to its rejection. The improbability of an accused making a confession to close associates of the deceased. [Paras 6-7]
Inconsistency in Prosecution's Case – Mismatch in Weapons and...
(6)
SANJAY BABU LAL Petitioner(s) Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(s) D.D
08/11/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeal – Review Petition – Delay in filing the review petition condoned due to petitioner’s confinement – Review petition allowed, order dated 31.08.2018 recalled, and SLP(Crl.) no. 7528/2018 restored to its original number and file. Leave granted in SLP(Crl.) no. 7528/2018.
Criminal Procedure – Examination of trial Court records and evidence – Appel...
(7)
HARIPRASAD @ KISHAN SAHU …APPELLANT(S) Vs.
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
07/11/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeal – Conviction and sentencing under Section 302 IPC – Appellant challenged the High Court's affirmation of conviction and life sentence for murder – Primary contention involved delay in FIR and absence of direct evidence linking appellant to administration of poison. [Para 1-5]
Delayed FIR – Examination of whether a one-year delay in FIR registration im...
(8)
RAMAKANT SINGH & ORS. APPELLANT(S) Vs.
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) D.D
07/11/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Procedure – Protest Petition Against Order Taking Cognizance – Inappropriateness of High Court’s Reference to Nupur Talwar Case – High Court erred in applying the principle of the Nupur Talwar case to the present matter, where the protest petition was against an order taking cognizance. The appellants successfully challenged the High Court’s judgment that inc...
(9)
THANKAMMA BABY …APPELLANT Vs.
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, KOCHI, KERALA …RESPONDENT D.D
07/11/2023
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Employees’ Provident Fund Act Interpretation – Applicability of the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, to an establishment engaged in manufacturing, assembling, and selling umbrellas – Central Government’s notification under clause (b) of sub-Section (3) of Section 1 of the 1952 Act includes ‘trading and commercial establishments&r...