(1)
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI .....Appellant Vs.
SMT. SHASHI KIRAN AND OTHERS ETC. .....Respondent D.D
10/05/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Service Law – Extension for exercising the switchover from CPF to GPF – The Pension Regulations and GPF Scheme require employees to opt for either CPF or GPF. The Supreme Court held that employees do not have an inherent right to demand an extension for exercising the switchover option [Paras 1-18].
Service Law – Pension and Provident Fund Schemes – The court d...
(2)
GOMANTAK MAZDOOR SANGH .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF GOA AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
10/05/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Minimum Wages – Correction of Errors – Only clerical or arithmetical mistakes in any order fixing or revising minimum rates of wages can be corrected under Section 10 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The notification dated 23/24.05.2016, which fixed minimum wages including special allowance, was issued after following due procedure. The subsequent errata notification dated 14.07.2016, w...
(3)
RESHMA SULTANA .....Appellant Vs.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
10/05/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Service Law – Cancellation of Appointment – The entire selection/recruitment process was found to be fraudulent, including manipulation in the resolution and absence of a valid resolution for the appointment. The cancellation of the appointment was upheld [Paras 6-7].
Judicial Review – Selection Process – The court held that once a selection process i...
(4)
SURESH MAHAJAN .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
10/05/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Local Government – Elections – The process of delimitation and/or triple test compliance is continuous and time-consuming. However, the conduct of elections for installing newly elected bodies to take over from the outgoing elected representatives whose term had expired is mandated by the Constitution and relevant enactments. The State Election Commission must proceed with elections wi...
(5)
M/S ARAVALI POWER CO PVT LTD .....Appellant Vs.
VEDPRAKASH AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
10/05/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Environmental Law – Utilization of Fly Ash – The NGT addressed issues regarding the handling of accumulated fly ash by thermal power plants. The NGT found that several thermal power plants failed to take adequate steps for the scientific disposal of fly ash in accordance with statutory notifications issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) under th...
(6)
REKHA JAIN .....Appellant Vs.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
10/05/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Quashing of Proceedings – The appellant, Rekha Jain, was charged under Section 420 of the IPC. The allegations primarily concerned her husband, Kamalesh Mulchand Jain, who was accused of cheating and dishonestly inducing the complainant to deliver gold jewellery. There were no allegations against Rekha Jain of any inducement or dishonest actions to deceive the complainan...
(7)
VEENA SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LR .....Appellant Vs.
THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR/ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR (F/R) AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
10/05/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Registration – Execution of Document – Execution is not merely signing the document. Execution involves signing by way of assent to the terms embodied in the document. Admitting a signature does not equate to admitting execution, especially if the signature was obtained under misleading circumstances or without the signatory fully understanding the document's content. The Sub-Regis...
(8)
BHOLA KUMHAR .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH .....Respondent D.D
09/05/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Compensation for Unlawful Detention – The appellant was convicted under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to 12 years of rigorous imprisonment. The High Court reduced the sentence to 7 years but the appellant was not released after completing the reduced sentence. He remained in custody for an additional period due to an alleged administrative oversight, which violated his r...
(9)
DILIP HARIRAMANI .....Appellant Vs.
BANK OF BARODA .....Respondent D.D
09/05/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Negotiable Instruments Act – Vicarious Liability – The appellant, a partner of M/s. Global Packaging, was convicted under Section 138 of the NI Act for cheque dishonour, despite the firm not being prosecuted. The Supreme Court held that vicarious liability under Section 141 can only be imposed if the firm is prosecuted as the principal offender. Without establishing that the appellant ...