(1)
GREGORY PATRAO AND OTHERS .....Appellant Vs.
RESPONDENT(S): MANGALORE REFINERY AND PETROCHEMICALS LIMITED AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
11/07/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Land Acquisition – "Person Interested" – MRPL as Allottee – Acquired land allotted to MRPL by KIADB – High Court erred in treating MRPL as a "person interested" entitled to participate in compensation determination – Proper party in reference proceedings only if acquisition is under Land Acquisition Act, not KIAD Act [Paras 6-7.1, 7.5-7.6].
&nbs...
(2)
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Appellants Vs.
DR. VIJAY MALLYA .....Respondent D.D
11/07/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Contempt of Court – Non-disclosure of Assets – Respondent guilty of contempt for failing to disclose assets and violating court orders restraining transfer of funds – Supreme Court holds actions contumacious and orders adequate punishment – Emphasizes need for compliance with court orders to maintain majesty of law [Paras 1-30].
Reversal of Transactions –...
(3)
ABU SALEM ABDUL KAYYUM ANSARI .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .....Respondent D.D
11/07/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Constitutional Law – Article 72 – Extradition and Sovereign Assurance – Appellant convicted in the 1993 Bombay Blasts Case – Completing 25 years of sentence – Central Government bound to advise the President of India for release under Article 72 in accordance with international commitment and principles of comity of courts – Courts in India must impose sentence ...
(4)
MOHAMMAD IRFAN .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF KARNATAKA .....Respondent D.D
11/07/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Conspiracy and Terrorist Activities – Appellants convicted for conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, possession of arms and explosives, and association with banned organization Lasker-e-Toiba – Convictions upheld under Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 122, 124A, 153A, and 153B of IPC; Sections 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act; and Sections 25 and 26 of the Arms Act ...
(5)
VIRENDRA .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH .....Respondent D.D
11/07/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Penal Code 1860 (IPC) – Section 302/34 – Murder by Gunshot – Appellant convicted of murder – Recovery of the gun from co-accused, allegedly owned by the appellant – Prosecution failed to prove how the weapon came into the possession of the co-accused and who used it – Inadequate evidence and improper recovery process – Conviction and sentence set aside due...
(6)
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED .....Appellant Vs.
M/S. NEMICHAND DAMODARDAS & ANR. .....Respondent D.D
11/07/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Land Acquisition – Market Value Determination – Market value of land depends on location, area, development status, size of land plot, and other advantageous or disadvantageous factors – Rates in Ready Reckoner, intended for stamp duty collection, cannot be used to determine compensation for land acquisition – Reliance on Ready Reckoner rates leads to erroneous enhancement ...
(7)
DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. .....Appellant Vs.
AIRPORT ECONOMIC REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents D.D
11/07/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Economic Regulation – Aeronautical Tariffs – AERA’s Determination – Appeals by airport operators challenging tariff orders by AERA – Key issues include treatment of Fuel Throughput Charges (FTC) as aeronautical revenue, calculation of Hypothetical Regulatory Asset Base (HRAB), and methodology for applying CPI-X formula for tariff determination – Supreme Court up...
(8)
AMRIK SINGH .....Appellant Vs.
THE STATE OF PUNJAB .....Respondent D.D
11/07/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Penal Code 1860 (IPC) – Sections 302/34 and 392 – Murder and Robbery – Conviction based on witness identification in court without a prior Test Identification Parade (TIP) – FIR cannot be an encyclopedia, but the first version of the complainant in the FIR is crucial when no TIP is conducted – The complainant did not provide a description of the accused in the FIR &nd...
(9)
DR. GAJENDRA SINGH .....Appellant Vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents D.D
11/07/2022
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Disciplinary Proceedings – Removal from Service – Branch Manager issued an insurance cover note without collecting premium – Subsequent claim led to financial loss for the company – Disciplinary authority ordered removal without disqualification for future employment – High Court upheld the decision – Supreme Court found punishment disproportionate given appella...