MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

West Bengal State Police’s Investigation Tainted and Biased: Calcutta High Court Orders Transfer of PDS Scam Probe to CBI

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court today ordered the transfer of a high-profile money laundering case, linked to a public distribution system scam, from the West Bengal State Police to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The Double Bench of Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya expressed concerns over the “tainted and biased” investigation conducted by the state police.

The appeals, filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the State of West Bengal, challenged the formation of a Special Investigating Team (SIT) including CBI and state police officers. The court’s decision centered on the principle that in matters involving high-ranking state officials or tainted investigations, transferring the case to an autonomous agency like the CBI is constitutionally permissible and necessary for unbiased justice.

The ED’s investigation into the PDS scam had implicated several influential political figures. Events escalated on January 5, 2024, when ED’s raid at Sk. Shahjahan’s residence turned violent, leading to multiple FIRs with conflicting narratives. The state police’s alleged failure to arrest Shahjahan, delayed FIR registrations, and exclusion of severe charges raised suspicions of biased investigation, prompting ED to seek a transfer of the case to the CBI.

The court meticulously examined each legal point, citing precedents like the “State of West Bengal v. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights”. The bench observed significant discrepancies and bias in the state police’s handling of FIRs and their investigation process. Their failure to arrest key accused Shahjahan, despite clear evidence of his involvement and influence, indicated a compromised investigation.

Decision Concluding that the state police investigation was neither objective nor fair, the High Court ruled in favor of transferring the case to the CBI. The court ordered the immediate transfer of accused Sk. Shahjahan’s custody to the CBI, emphasizing the need for a swift and impartial probe.

Date of Decision: March 5, 2024

Enforcement Directorate, Kolkata Zonal Office I vs. State of West Bengal and Others

 

Latest Legal News