Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

West Bengal State Police’s Investigation Tainted and Biased: Calcutta High Court Orders Transfer of PDS Scam Probe to CBI

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court today ordered the transfer of a high-profile money laundering case, linked to a public distribution system scam, from the West Bengal State Police to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The Double Bench of Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya expressed concerns over the “tainted and biased” investigation conducted by the state police.

The appeals, filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the State of West Bengal, challenged the formation of a Special Investigating Team (SIT) including CBI and state police officers. The court’s decision centered on the principle that in matters involving high-ranking state officials or tainted investigations, transferring the case to an autonomous agency like the CBI is constitutionally permissible and necessary for unbiased justice.

The ED’s investigation into the PDS scam had implicated several influential political figures. Events escalated on January 5, 2024, when ED’s raid at Sk. Shahjahan’s residence turned violent, leading to multiple FIRs with conflicting narratives. The state police’s alleged failure to arrest Shahjahan, delayed FIR registrations, and exclusion of severe charges raised suspicions of biased investigation, prompting ED to seek a transfer of the case to the CBI.

The court meticulously examined each legal point, citing precedents like the “State of West Bengal v. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights”. The bench observed significant discrepancies and bias in the state police’s handling of FIRs and their investigation process. Their failure to arrest key accused Shahjahan, despite clear evidence of his involvement and influence, indicated a compromised investigation.

Decision Concluding that the state police investigation was neither objective nor fair, the High Court ruled in favor of transferring the case to the CBI. The court ordered the immediate transfer of accused Sk. Shahjahan’s custody to the CBI, emphasizing the need for a swift and impartial probe.

Date of Decision: March 5, 2024

Enforcement Directorate, Kolkata Zonal Office I vs. State of West Bengal and Others

 

Latest Legal News