Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

West Bengal State Police’s Investigation Tainted and Biased: Calcutta High Court Orders Transfer of PDS Scam Probe to CBI

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court today ordered the transfer of a high-profile money laundering case, linked to a public distribution system scam, from the West Bengal State Police to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The Double Bench of Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya expressed concerns over the “tainted and biased” investigation conducted by the state police.

The appeals, filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the State of West Bengal, challenged the formation of a Special Investigating Team (SIT) including CBI and state police officers. The court’s decision centered on the principle that in matters involving high-ranking state officials or tainted investigations, transferring the case to an autonomous agency like the CBI is constitutionally permissible and necessary for unbiased justice.

The ED’s investigation into the PDS scam had implicated several influential political figures. Events escalated on January 5, 2024, when ED’s raid at Sk. Shahjahan’s residence turned violent, leading to multiple FIRs with conflicting narratives. The state police’s alleged failure to arrest Shahjahan, delayed FIR registrations, and exclusion of severe charges raised suspicions of biased investigation, prompting ED to seek a transfer of the case to the CBI.

The court meticulously examined each legal point, citing precedents like the “State of West Bengal v. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights”. The bench observed significant discrepancies and bias in the state police’s handling of FIRs and their investigation process. Their failure to arrest key accused Shahjahan, despite clear evidence of his involvement and influence, indicated a compromised investigation.

Decision Concluding that the state police investigation was neither objective nor fair, the High Court ruled in favor of transferring the case to the CBI. The court ordered the immediate transfer of accused Sk. Shahjahan’s custody to the CBI, emphasizing the need for a swift and impartial probe.

Date of Decision: March 5, 2024

Enforcement Directorate, Kolkata Zonal Office I vs. State of West Bengal and Others

 

Latest Legal News