Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case - Lack of Cogent Evidence: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment handed down on October 18, 2023, the High Court of Delhi upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case, emphasizing the need for reliable and trustworthy evidence in such cases.

The case in question, registered under Section 376/34 IPC, involved serious allegations against the accused. However, the trial court had acquitted the accused due to inconsistencies in the testimony of the prosecutrix and the lack of supporting medical and scientific evidence.

The High Court, while addressing the prosecution's challenge to the acquittal, cited the importance of corroborating the prosecutrix's testimony with other evidence. The court observed that the prosecutrix had given contradictory statements regarding the role of the accused persons and the events surrounding the alleged rape.

The judgment also referred to established legal principles, including Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which grants the High Court the authority to review the evidence in cases of acquittal. It further emphasized the need to avoid miscarriages of justice, whether arising from the acquittal of the guilty or the conviction of the innocent.

In its conclusion, the High Court found that the prosecution had failed to provide cogent evidence to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. As a result, the acquittal of the accused was upheld, highlighting the stringent standards of evidence required in cases of this nature.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the judicial responsibility to ensure that justice is served, based on the principles of fairness, reliability, and adherence to the rule of law.

Date of Decision: 18 October 2023

STATE   vs  DEVANAND& ORS.         

Latest Legal News