Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case - Lack of Cogent Evidence: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment handed down on October 18, 2023, the High Court of Delhi upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case, emphasizing the need for reliable and trustworthy evidence in such cases.

The case in question, registered under Section 376/34 IPC, involved serious allegations against the accused. However, the trial court had acquitted the accused due to inconsistencies in the testimony of the prosecutrix and the lack of supporting medical and scientific evidence.

The High Court, while addressing the prosecution's challenge to the acquittal, cited the importance of corroborating the prosecutrix's testimony with other evidence. The court observed that the prosecutrix had given contradictory statements regarding the role of the accused persons and the events surrounding the alleged rape.

The judgment also referred to established legal principles, including Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which grants the High Court the authority to review the evidence in cases of acquittal. It further emphasized the need to avoid miscarriages of justice, whether arising from the acquittal of the guilty or the conviction of the innocent.

In its conclusion, the High Court found that the prosecution had failed to provide cogent evidence to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. As a result, the acquittal of the accused was upheld, highlighting the stringent standards of evidence required in cases of this nature.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the judicial responsibility to ensure that justice is served, based on the principles of fairness, reliability, and adherence to the rule of law.

Date of Decision: 18 October 2023

STATE   vs  DEVANAND& ORS.         

Similar News