Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

"Unregistered Mortgage Deed Invalid: Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Trial Court’s Judgment in Property Dispute"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court, presided over by Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, reaffirmed the importance of legal formalities in property transactions. The court, on March 14th, 2024, dismissed the First Appeal No. 171 of 2017, filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by appellant Hetram Sahu, challenging the trial court's decision that declared a mortgage deed null and void.

The dispute centered around a property transaction dating back to September 20, 2006, between Hetram Sahu (appellant/defendant No.1) and Ramlal Chouhan (plaintiff/respondent). The plaintiff accused the defendant of deceitfully executing a mortgage deed instead of a rent agreement. This deed came to the plaintiff's notice only in 2012 during a proceeding under Section 145 of the Cr.P.C.

Justice Vyas, in his judgment, emphasized the legal requirements for a valid mortgage, stating, "It is a mortgage by conditional sale. The issue with regard to mortgage has recently come up for consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No 706 of 2015 decided on 18-8-2023 in case of Prakash (dead) by LR vs. G. Aradhya and others." The court found the mortgage deed in question to be a conditional sale, which did not fulfill the necessary conditions outlined in Section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the importance of registration under the Registration Act, 1908, for properties valued over Rs. 100. "If the sale property is more than Rs. 100/- then it should be registered document," the court observed, underscoring the invalidity of the unregistered mortgage deed in this case.

The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court's decision in favor of Ramlal Chouhan and highlighting the necessity of registration for the legitimacy of property transactions. This judgment serves as a crucial reminder of the legal intricacies in property dealings and the consequences of neglecting procedural compliance.

Date of Decision: 14-03-2024 

HETRAM SAHU Vs. RAMLAL CHOUHAN AND OTHER

Latest Legal News