Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

"Unregistered Mortgage Deed Invalid: Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Trial Court’s Judgment in Property Dispute"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court, presided over by Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, reaffirmed the importance of legal formalities in property transactions. The court, on March 14th, 2024, dismissed the First Appeal No. 171 of 2017, filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by appellant Hetram Sahu, challenging the trial court's decision that declared a mortgage deed null and void.

The dispute centered around a property transaction dating back to September 20, 2006, between Hetram Sahu (appellant/defendant No.1) and Ramlal Chouhan (plaintiff/respondent). The plaintiff accused the defendant of deceitfully executing a mortgage deed instead of a rent agreement. This deed came to the plaintiff's notice only in 2012 during a proceeding under Section 145 of the Cr.P.C.

Justice Vyas, in his judgment, emphasized the legal requirements for a valid mortgage, stating, "It is a mortgage by conditional sale. The issue with regard to mortgage has recently come up for consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No 706 of 2015 decided on 18-8-2023 in case of Prakash (dead) by LR vs. G. Aradhya and others." The court found the mortgage deed in question to be a conditional sale, which did not fulfill the necessary conditions outlined in Section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the importance of registration under the Registration Act, 1908, for properties valued over Rs. 100. "If the sale property is more than Rs. 100/- then it should be registered document," the court observed, underscoring the invalidity of the unregistered mortgage deed in this case.

The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court's decision in favor of Ramlal Chouhan and highlighting the necessity of registration for the legitimacy of property transactions. This judgment serves as a crucial reminder of the legal intricacies in property dealings and the consequences of neglecting procedural compliance.

Date of Decision: 14-03-2024 

HETRAM SAHU Vs. RAMLAL CHOUHAN AND OTHER

Latest Legal News