Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance

"Unregistered Mortgage Deed Invalid: Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Trial Court’s Judgment in Property Dispute"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court, presided over by Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, reaffirmed the importance of legal formalities in property transactions. The court, on March 14th, 2024, dismissed the First Appeal No. 171 of 2017, filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by appellant Hetram Sahu, challenging the trial court's decision that declared a mortgage deed null and void.

The dispute centered around a property transaction dating back to September 20, 2006, between Hetram Sahu (appellant/defendant No.1) and Ramlal Chouhan (plaintiff/respondent). The plaintiff accused the defendant of deceitfully executing a mortgage deed instead of a rent agreement. This deed came to the plaintiff's notice only in 2012 during a proceeding under Section 145 of the Cr.P.C.

Justice Vyas, in his judgment, emphasized the legal requirements for a valid mortgage, stating, "It is a mortgage by conditional sale. The issue with regard to mortgage has recently come up for consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No 706 of 2015 decided on 18-8-2023 in case of Prakash (dead) by LR vs. G. Aradhya and others." The court found the mortgage deed in question to be a conditional sale, which did not fulfill the necessary conditions outlined in Section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the importance of registration under the Registration Act, 1908, for properties valued over Rs. 100. "If the sale property is more than Rs. 100/- then it should be registered document," the court observed, underscoring the invalidity of the unregistered mortgage deed in this case.

The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court's decision in favor of Ramlal Chouhan and highlighting the necessity of registration for the legitimacy of property transactions. This judgment serves as a crucial reminder of the legal intricacies in property dealings and the consequences of neglecting procedural compliance.

Date of Decision: 14-03-2024 

HETRAM SAHU Vs. RAMLAL CHOUHAN AND OTHER

Latest Legal News