Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Truth and Justice Prevail Over Technicalities in Family Law Disputes,” Delhi High Court Upholds Fresh Income Affidavit in Maintenance Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a landmark ruling, emphasized the supremacy of truth and justice over procedural formalities in family law matters. Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta dismissed a petition challenging the Family Court’s decision to permit a fresh income affidavit in a maintenance case under Section 125 Cr.P.C., reinforcing the principle that the pursuit of truth is paramount in such disputes.

The case, titled Sachin Kumar Daksh v. Mamta Gola and Anr, revolved around the petitioner’s objection to the respondent’s (his wife’s) filing of a fresh income affidavit in ongoing maintenance proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The petitioner contested that the new affidavit, which amended details from the original, could affect a pending application under Section 340 Cr.P.C.

The dispute stems from a divorce petition filed by the petitioner and a subsequent maintenance petition by the respondent. The respondent sought to amend her income affidavit after her initial submission was contested by the petitioner for containing incorrect information. The Family Court initially denied this request but later permitted the amendment, following the High Court’s intervention.

Justice Mendiratta, in his assessment, emphasized the role of Family Courts in ensuring justice and the pursuit of truth. He noted, “The maintenance granted to the wife is as a measure of social justice and the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is with an objective to protect women and children from vagrancy and destitution.” The judge underscored that technicalities should not overshadow the fundamental objective of reaching the truth in family disputes.

The court referenced the precedent set in Rajnesh v. Neha and Another, and a similar case (CRL.M.C.260/2024), where objections against an amended affidavit were dismissed. It was observed that the filing of a fresh affidavit does not negate the earlier one and that any false affidavit consequences would be addressed separately, without impacting the Section 340 Cr.P.C. application.

The High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the Family Court’s decision to allow the filing of a fresh income and expenditure affidavit. The court stated that this would enable an accurate assessment of maintenance without prejudicing the petitioner.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024

Sachin Kumar Daksh v. Mamta Gola and Anr

Latest Legal News