Ocular Testimony, Medical Evidence, and Silence of Accused Create a Chain So Complete: Calcutta High Court Upholds Conviction Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Not Ousted by Convenient Title Disputes: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Revision in Long-Running Eviction Suit Performance Appraisals of Forest Officers Must Remain Within IFS Hierarchy—Violation Contemptuous: Supreme Court “If One Case Was Reconsidered, So Must Be the Other”—Supreme Court Orders Army Chief to Review Denied Promotion of Territorial Army Officer Tenancy Cannot Be Claimed by Partnership Merely Because Business Was Run from Rented Premises: Gujarat High Court If a Person is Last Seen with Deceased, He Must Offer Explanation; Failure to Do So Completes Chain of Circumstances: Bombay High Court Registration Alone Cannot Validate a Will Executed Under Suspicious Circumstances: Allahabad High Court Restores Trial Court Decree Cancelling Will Complaint Need Not Be a “Mantra Recitation”: Supreme Court Clarifies Director’s Criminal Liability Under Section 141 NI Act Advocate Who Poured Acid Must Serve Life—Retired Army Man Gets Sentence Reduced: Supreme Court Delivers Split Relief in Brutal Attack Case Flood Damage Is Not Seepage: Supreme Court Slams Insurance Repudiation, Orders NCDRC to Reassess Compensation NRC Draft Entry No Shield Against Foreigners Tribunal Ruling: Supreme Court Affirms Foreigner Status of Assam Resident Bank Guarantee Is Not Tax Payment—Customs Refund Must Be Released Without Delay: Supreme Court Slams Revenue Over ₹77 Lakh Withholding A Marriage Filled with Emotional Blackmail, Violence, and Relentless Litigation Cannot Be Saved: Orissa High Court Affirms Divorce Decree Privileges of Green Card Holders Are Not Enforceable Rights: Delhi High Court Backs Club's Power to Revoke Facility Access to Overage Dependents Secured Creditors Now Take First Seat: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Bank Has Priority Over VAT Dues Under Section 31B of RDB Act Recruitment Rules Cannot Be Altered to Suit Ineligible Candidates After Selection Process Concludes: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Appointments Made Post Cut-Off Revision Submission of Caste Certificate in Prescribed Format Is Not a Triviality – It's the Fulcrum of Fair Recruitment: Supreme Court Tampering With Court Records After Case Withdrawal Not Protected By Section 195 CrPC: Supreme Court Crude Degummed Soybean Oil Is Not Agriculture—It's Manufacture: Supreme Court Slams Customs for Denying Duty Exemption Once You Waive, You Can't Reclaim: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Slams Belated Jurisdictional Objection as Abuse of Process Dock Identification Is Not Optional—When Victim Fails to Identify Accused, Conviction Becomes Legally Unsustainable: Calcutta HC Detention Beyond 24 Hours Without Judicial Oversight Is a Constitutional Breach: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in Foreign National Case Delay in Naming Accused, Contradictory Testimonies, and Unreliable Medical Records Render Prosecution Case Untrustworthy: Allahabad High Court

The obligation to approach the Court with clean hands is an absolute obligation: High Court Dismisses Petition, Criticizes Litigant for Concealment of Prior Adverse Judgment

10 May 2025 7:40 PM

By: sayum


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana has dismissed a petition filed by M/s DRS Plastchem Private Limited, condemning the petitioner for concealing prior adverse judgments and attempting to mislead the court. The bench, comprising Justices Arun Palli and Vikram Aggarwal, emphasized the necessity for litigants to approach the court with clean hands, labeling the petition as an abuse of the judicial process.

M/s DRS Plastchem Private Limited purchased an industrial plot from M/s Sunbeam Construction Private Limited and received a re-allotment letter on July 1, 2011. Due to non-payment of enhanced costs amounting to approximately Rs. 1 crore, the plot was resumed on March 13, 2020. The petitioner’s appeal against this resumption order was dismissed on January 10, 2023. Subsequently, the petitioner approached the court multiple times, culminating in the present writ petition challenging the resumption order and the appellate authority’s decision.

The court discovered that M/s DRS Plastchem had previously filed a writ petition (CWP-7715-2023) challenging the same orders, which was dismissed on April 17, 2023. The petitioner failed to disclose this fact in the current petition. "This fact has been withheld by the petitioner from this Court," the judgment noted, criticizing the petitioner for attempting to mislead the judiciary.

Emphasizing the duty of litigants to fully disclose all relevant facts, the court cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kishore Samrite vs. State of U.P. and others, which underscores the principle that litigants must approach the court with clean hands and truthful disclosures. "A petition which lacks bona fide and conceals vital facts is an abuse of the process of law," the bench reiterated.

The court condemned the petitioner’s conduct, stating, "This conduct of the petitioner is strongly deprecated." The bench further remarked that such attempts to mislead the court must be dealt with firmly to deter other unscrupulous litigants.

The court, relying on established jurisprudence, highlighted the importance of honesty and full disclosure in judicial proceedings. "Truth is the basis of the justice delivery system," the court remarked, emphasizing that any attempt to pollute the stream of justice with falsehood must be curbed.

Justice Vikram Aggarwal stated, "The obligation to approach the Court with clean hands is an absolute obligation." He further elaborated, "It is the bounden duty of the Court to ensure that dishonesty and any attempt to surpass the legal process must be effectively curbed."

The High Court’s dismissal of the petition underscores the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of the legal process. By imposing a cost of Rs. 1 lakh on the petitioner for abusing the judicial process, the court sent a clear message regarding the importance of honesty and transparency in legal proceedings. This judgment is expected to reinforce the principle that litigants must always approach the court with clean hands and truthful disclosures.

Date of Decision: July 15, 2024

Latest Legal News