Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

The obligation to approach the Court with clean hands is an absolute obligation: High Court Dismisses Petition, Criticizes Litigant for Concealment of Prior Adverse Judgment

10 May 2025 7:40 PM

By: sayum


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana has dismissed a petition filed by M/s DRS Plastchem Private Limited, condemning the petitioner for concealing prior adverse judgments and attempting to mislead the court. The bench, comprising Justices Arun Palli and Vikram Aggarwal, emphasized the necessity for litigants to approach the court with clean hands, labeling the petition as an abuse of the judicial process.

M/s DRS Plastchem Private Limited purchased an industrial plot from M/s Sunbeam Construction Private Limited and received a re-allotment letter on July 1, 2011. Due to non-payment of enhanced costs amounting to approximately Rs. 1 crore, the plot was resumed on March 13, 2020. The petitioner’s appeal against this resumption order was dismissed on January 10, 2023. Subsequently, the petitioner approached the court multiple times, culminating in the present writ petition challenging the resumption order and the appellate authority’s decision.

The court discovered that M/s DRS Plastchem had previously filed a writ petition (CWP-7715-2023) challenging the same orders, which was dismissed on April 17, 2023. The petitioner failed to disclose this fact in the current petition. "This fact has been withheld by the petitioner from this Court," the judgment noted, criticizing the petitioner for attempting to mislead the judiciary.

Emphasizing the duty of litigants to fully disclose all relevant facts, the court cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kishore Samrite vs. State of U.P. and others, which underscores the principle that litigants must approach the court with clean hands and truthful disclosures. "A petition which lacks bona fide and conceals vital facts is an abuse of the process of law," the bench reiterated.

The court condemned the petitioner’s conduct, stating, "This conduct of the petitioner is strongly deprecated." The bench further remarked that such attempts to mislead the court must be dealt with firmly to deter other unscrupulous litigants.

The court, relying on established jurisprudence, highlighted the importance of honesty and full disclosure in judicial proceedings. "Truth is the basis of the justice delivery system," the court remarked, emphasizing that any attempt to pollute the stream of justice with falsehood must be curbed.

Justice Vikram Aggarwal stated, "The obligation to approach the Court with clean hands is an absolute obligation." He further elaborated, "It is the bounden duty of the Court to ensure that dishonesty and any attempt to surpass the legal process must be effectively curbed."

The High Court’s dismissal of the petition underscores the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of the legal process. By imposing a cost of Rs. 1 lakh on the petitioner for abusing the judicial process, the court sent a clear message regarding the importance of honesty and transparency in legal proceedings. This judgment is expected to reinforce the principle that litigants must always approach the court with clean hands and truthful disclosures.

Date of Decision: July 15, 2024

Latest Legal News