Inordinate Delay Cannot Be Condoned Without Reasons: Supreme Court Slams Madhya Pradesh High Court for Casual Approach in Condoning 1612 Days’ Delay Constitutional Rights & Witness Protection | State Authorities Cannot Victimise Litigants for Approaching Court: Supreme Court Review Jurisdiction is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Supreme Court Dismisses Konkan Railway’s Plea Over Employee’s Resignation Withdrawal Sexual Harassment Complaint Can Be Inquired by ICC at Woman’s Workplace Even if Accused Works Elsewhere: Supreme Court Settles Jurisdiction Under POSH Act Mandate Expired, Arbitrator Functus Officio: Supreme Court Orders Substitution After Delay in Arbitral Award Mere Delay in Execution Cannot Defeat Specific Performance Decree: Supreme Court Restores Buyer’s Right Despite 87-Day Delay Granting protection from arrest after refusing to quash the FIR is nothing short of backdoor anticipatory bail: Supreme Court Warns High Courts Against Judicial Overreach Routine Discord Is Not Cruelty: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Husband, Cautions Against Misuse of 498A IPC in Matrimonial Disputes State Cannot Name Villages After Individuals in Violation of Its Own Policy: Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan’s Naming of ‘Amargarh’ and ‘Sagatsar’ as Arbitrary Deficiency in Service Not the Same as Medical Negligence: Supreme Court Upholds WB Clinical Commission’s Power to Award Compensation for Deficiency in Patient Care Bail Cannot Be Granted By Ignoring Prior Misuse Of Liberty: Supreme Court Cancels Bail In Case Where Accused Allegedly Murdered Prime Witness After Release Income Tax | Enduring Advantage Is Not Always Capital: Supreme Court Allows Deduction of Non-Compete Fee as Revenue Expenditure When Liberty is Made Conditional, the Constitution is at Risk: Supreme Court Allows Passport Renewal Despite Pending Criminal Cases Section 311 CrPC Is Not a Gateway for Speculative Testimony: Supreme Court Bars Minor Child’s Examination 7 Years After Dowry Death Truth May Wear Rags, But It Must Be Recognized: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Despite Minor Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Testimony Supplemental Agreements Signed Under Economic Duress Are Void—Contractor Entitled to Verified Payments Despite No Damages for Delay: Kerala High Court Mere Cruelty Does Not Amount to Abetment of Suicide: Karnataka High Court Overturns Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Marriage Was Only a Label, and Her Return Was Conditional on Dowry: Delhi High Court Affirms Husband’s Conviction for Dowry Death, Acquits In-Laws Due to Lack of Specific Evidence High Courts Hold the Hammer: Allahabad HC Affirms Jurisdiction in Enforcement of Domestic Awards in International Commercial Arbitrations Passengers’ Statements Not Mandatory in Domestic Enquiries: P&H High Court Upholds Dismissal of Conductor for Fare Embezzlement No Opinion, No Change: Madras High Court Upholds Reassessment Under Section 147 for Excess 80HHC Deduction Admitted Signature, No Defence, Yet Acquitted: Madras High Court Finds Trial Court Erred, But Dismisses NI Act Appeal As Infructuous After Accused's Death Incomplete Bids Must Remain Drafts: Karnataka High Court Upholds Exclusion of Contractor for Failing to Submit Final Tender Audit Report Alone Is Not Proof of Loss: Himachal Pradesh High Court Rejects ₹2.54 Crore Insurance Claim Filed by Co-operative Bank for Employee Fraud Trial Court Cannot Dismiss Suit While Returning Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction Without Complying with Order 7 Rule 10-A: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Termination Without Fair Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice: Punjab and Haryana High Court in Dental Internship Case

18 June 2025 11:06 AM

By: sayum


High Court mandates DCI to review representation within 15 days, emphasizing adherence to procedural fairness and natural justice principles. The Punjab and Haryana High Court has intervened in a case concerning the termination of a dental student’s internship by the Dental Council of India (DCI). The bench, comprising Justices Rajesh Bhardwaj and Kirti Singh, has directed the DCI to decide on the petitioner Jasleen Kaur’s representation within 15 days, stressing the necessity of a fair hearing and adherence to the principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Jasleen Kaur, completed her Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) degree in 8½ years, including a mercy chance granted by the university. Subsequently, she commenced her rotatory internship, which was later terminated by the DCI on the grounds that the period taken to complete her BDS exceeded the stipulated 9 years. Kaur challenged the termination, asserting that she was not given a fair hearing, thereby violating the principles of natural justice.

The court underscored the importance of a fair hearing, emphasizing that decisions affecting an individual’s career and future must be taken judiciously. “The necessity of providing a fair chance to the petitioner before terminating her internship cannot be overstated,” the bench remarked. The court noted that the DCI had failed to consider Kaur’s representation before terminating her internship, which constituted a violation of natural justice.

The court directed the DCI to expedite the decision-making process regarding Kaur’s representation. “Respondent No. 3 is directed to decide the representation dated 06.06.2024 within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of this order,” the judgment stated. This directive aims to ensure that the petitioner’s case is reviewed promptly and fairly.

The court granted interim relief to Kaur by staying the impugned termination order until the DCI reaches a decision on her representation. “Till then, the impugned order dated 21.05.2024 be kept in abeyance,” the court ordered, allowing Kaur to continue her internship temporarily.

Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj noted, “To meet the ends of justice, respondent No. 3 is directed to decide the representation within a period of 15 days and communicate the decision to the petitioner and the university.” This statement reflects the court’s commitment to ensuring that the petitioner receives a fair opportunity to present her case.

The High Court’s decision underscores the judiciary’s role in upholding the principles of natural justice and ensuring fair treatment in administrative decisions. By mandating a timely review of Kaur’s representation, the court has provided her with a crucial opportunity to contest the termination of her internship. This judgment highlights the importance of procedural fairness and is expected to influence similar cases, reinforcing the legal framework for administrative actions.

Date of Decision: 20th June 2024

Latest Legal News