Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

Termination of Pregnancy Beyond Statutory Limit of 24 Weeks Not Permissible, Even in Cases of Rape: Gujarat High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, in a detailed judgment, ruled against the termination of pregnancy in a case involving a 16-year-old rape victim, citing that the pregnancy had exceeded the statutory limit of 24 weeks, absence of fetal abnormalities, and no immediate threat to the life of the petitioner. The Court balanced the rights of the unborn child against the traumatic circumstances of the petitioner.

The petitioner, a minor rape victim, sought judicial direction for the termination of her pregnancy, which was at 26 weeks and 4 days of gestation. The petition was filed under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, with the victim having been raped by her uncle and neighbors. The application also requested DNA identification of the fetus tissues for ensuring justice.

On Termination of Pregnancy: The court, while empathizing with the victim's situation, noted that the pregnancy had crossed the statutory limit of 24 weeks as per the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act. The Medical Board's report indicated no substantial fetal abnormalities and no immediate threat to the life of the petitioner, leading the court to decide against the termination of pregnancy.

Regarding the Rights of the Unborn Child: Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar observed, "The unborn child has a right of protection from unlawful killing. Permitting termination of such a live fetus would equate to foeticide."

Reference to Supreme Court Decision: The judgment cited the Supreme Court's decision in X vs. Union of India & Another (2023 INSC 919), reinforcing the guidelines for termination of pregnancy.

Judicial Decision: The court, adhering to legal provisions and considering the medical report, denied the petition for termination of pregnancy. However, the court issued comprehensive directions for the victim's medical assistance.

Date of Decision: 07/03/2024

ABC VS STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    06 July 2026 2:51 PM
School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction
  • by sayum
    06 July 2026 2:51 PM
Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court
  • by sayum
    06 July 2026 2:50 PM
Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC
  • by sayum
    06 July 2026 2:50 PM
Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court
  • by sayum
    06 July 2026 2:50 PM
Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court
  • by sayum
    06 July 2026 10:56 AM
Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court