Court Must Conduct Inquiry on Mental Competency Before Appointing Legal Guardian - Punjab and Haryana High Court Right to Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to the Sentiments of Society: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Eve Teasing Case Supreme Court Extends Probation to 70-Year-Old in Decades-Old Family Feud Case Authorized Railway Agents Cannot Be Criminally Prosecuted for Unauthorized Procurement And Supply Of Railway Tickets: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily: Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Accused For Valid Arbitration Agreement and Party Consent Necessary: Supreme Court Declares Ex-Parte Arbitration Awards Null and Void NDPS | Lack of Homogeneous Mixing, Inventory Preparation, and Magistrate Certification Fatal to Prosecution's Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court "May Means May, and Shall Means Shall": Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court's Discretion Under Section 148 of NI Act Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Re-Evaluation of Coal Block Tender, Cites Concerns Over Arbitrary Disqualification Dying Declarations Must Be Beyond Doubt to Sustain Convictions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Burn Injury Murder Case No Legally Enforceable Debt Proven: Madras High Court Dismisses Petition for Special Leave to Appeal in Cheque Bounce Case Decisional Autonomy is a Core Part of the Right to Privacy : Kerala High Court Upholds LGBTQ+ Rights in Landmark Habeas Corpus Case Consent of a Minor Is No Defense Under the POCSO Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Well-Known Marks Demand Special Protection: Delhi HC Cancels Conflicting Trademark for RPG Industrial Products High Court Acquits Accused Due to ‘Golden Thread’ Principle: Gaps in Medical Evidence and Unexplained Time Frame Prove Decisive Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown; Awards ₹12 Crore Permanent Alimony Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary

Termination of Pregnancy Beyond Statutory Limit of 24 Weeks Not Permissible, Even in Cases of Rape: Gujarat High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, in a detailed judgment, ruled against the termination of pregnancy in a case involving a 16-year-old rape victim, citing that the pregnancy had exceeded the statutory limit of 24 weeks, absence of fetal abnormalities, and no immediate threat to the life of the petitioner. The Court balanced the rights of the unborn child against the traumatic circumstances of the petitioner.

The petitioner, a minor rape victim, sought judicial direction for the termination of her pregnancy, which was at 26 weeks and 4 days of gestation. The petition was filed under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, with the victim having been raped by her uncle and neighbors. The application also requested DNA identification of the fetus tissues for ensuring justice.

On Termination of Pregnancy: The court, while empathizing with the victim's situation, noted that the pregnancy had crossed the statutory limit of 24 weeks as per the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act. The Medical Board's report indicated no substantial fetal abnormalities and no immediate threat to the life of the petitioner, leading the court to decide against the termination of pregnancy.

Regarding the Rights of the Unborn Child: Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar observed, "The unborn child has a right of protection from unlawful killing. Permitting termination of such a live fetus would equate to foeticide."

Reference to Supreme Court Decision: The judgment cited the Supreme Court's decision in X vs. Union of India & Another (2023 INSC 919), reinforcing the guidelines for termination of pregnancy.

Judicial Decision: The court, adhering to legal provisions and considering the medical report, denied the petition for termination of pregnancy. However, the court issued comprehensive directions for the victim's medical assistance.

Date of Decision: 07/03/2024

ABC VS STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

Similar News