Lack Of Boundaries In Sale Deed Not Fatal To Title If Plot Number & Parent Title Are Sufficiently Identifiable: Calcutta High Court Terror Perception Of Underworld Justifies Delay In Invoking MCOCA; Purely Civil Disputes Can Metamorphose Into Criminal Offence: Bombay High Court Identical Wills Executed By Spouses On Same Day Not Necessarily 'Mutual Wills' Restricting Power Of Alienation: Delhi High Court Written Notice Not Mandatory For Revoking Permission Under Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act: Gujarat High Court Wife Cannot Maintain Complaint Against Husband Under Senior Citizens Act; Not Intended For Spousal Disputes: Karnataka High Court Mere Presence At Scene Or Facilitation Without Intent To Aid Crime Does Not Amount To Abetment: Delhi High Court Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court

Technical Irregularities Not Enough to Invalidate WB Medical Council Election: Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court at Calcutta, led by Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, dismissed a petition challenging the election of the President and Vice President of the West Bengal Medical Council (W.B.M.C.). The court emphasized, "The principle of factum valet also comes into play, since there was no substantial illegality in the first meeting of the members of the newly elected Council."

Dr. Kunal Saha, an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI), had raised objections over the procedural conduct of the Council's election, alleging violations of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914. The petitioner argued that the meeting and election held on November 1, 2022, were before the official Gazette notification date, thus violating Sections 11A and 11B of the Act.

The court carefully examined the petitioner's locus standi as an OCI cardholder under Sections 7A and 7B of the Citizenship Act, 1955, and Section 4 of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914. Justice Bhattacharyya noted, "The petitioner, being a registered medical practitioner having the right to practice in West Bengal, definitely has a right to so practice in an unfettered and proper manner."

In addressing the legal interpretation of the term "notification" within the Bengal Medical Act, the court found no significant illegality in the Council's first meeting held on the notification date but prior to its publication in the Gazette. "The newly-elected Council has already functioned with its President and Vice President for just over a year and has taken several decisions in the interregnum," the court observed, highlighting the potential disruptive impact of upholding the technical challenge at this stage.

Concluding the judgment, the court did not find any gross illegality in the election process of the West Bengal Medical Council. As a result, W.P.A. No.14447 of 2023 was dismissed, maintaining the status quo in the Council's functioning. This decision underscores the judiciary's approach in balancing technical compliance with practical realities in the administration of organizational elections.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

KUNAL SAHA VS REGISTRAR, WEST BENGAL MEDICAL COUNCIL (WBMC) and Another

Latest Legal News