Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

Technical Irregularities Not Enough to Invalidate WB Medical Council Election: Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court at Calcutta, led by Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, dismissed a petition challenging the election of the President and Vice President of the West Bengal Medical Council (W.B.M.C.). The court emphasized, "The principle of factum valet also comes into play, since there was no substantial illegality in the first meeting of the members of the newly elected Council."

Dr. Kunal Saha, an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI), had raised objections over the procedural conduct of the Council's election, alleging violations of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914. The petitioner argued that the meeting and election held on November 1, 2022, were before the official Gazette notification date, thus violating Sections 11A and 11B of the Act.

The court carefully examined the petitioner's locus standi as an OCI cardholder under Sections 7A and 7B of the Citizenship Act, 1955, and Section 4 of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914. Justice Bhattacharyya noted, "The petitioner, being a registered medical practitioner having the right to practice in West Bengal, definitely has a right to so practice in an unfettered and proper manner."

In addressing the legal interpretation of the term "notification" within the Bengal Medical Act, the court found no significant illegality in the Council's first meeting held on the notification date but prior to its publication in the Gazette. "The newly-elected Council has already functioned with its President and Vice President for just over a year and has taken several decisions in the interregnum," the court observed, highlighting the potential disruptive impact of upholding the technical challenge at this stage.

Concluding the judgment, the court did not find any gross illegality in the election process of the West Bengal Medical Council. As a result, W.P.A. No.14447 of 2023 was dismissed, maintaining the status quo in the Council's functioning. This decision underscores the judiciary's approach in balancing technical compliance with practical realities in the administration of organizational elections.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

KUNAL SAHA VS REGISTRAR, WEST BENGAL MEDICAL COUNCIL (WBMC) and Another

Similar News