Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Technical Irregularities Not Enough to Invalidate WB Medical Council Election: Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court at Calcutta, led by Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, dismissed a petition challenging the election of the President and Vice President of the West Bengal Medical Council (W.B.M.C.). The court emphasized, "The principle of factum valet also comes into play, since there was no substantial illegality in the first meeting of the members of the newly elected Council."

Dr. Kunal Saha, an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI), had raised objections over the procedural conduct of the Council's election, alleging violations of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914. The petitioner argued that the meeting and election held on November 1, 2022, were before the official Gazette notification date, thus violating Sections 11A and 11B of the Act.

The court carefully examined the petitioner's locus standi as an OCI cardholder under Sections 7A and 7B of the Citizenship Act, 1955, and Section 4 of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914. Justice Bhattacharyya noted, "The petitioner, being a registered medical practitioner having the right to practice in West Bengal, definitely has a right to so practice in an unfettered and proper manner."

In addressing the legal interpretation of the term "notification" within the Bengal Medical Act, the court found no significant illegality in the Council's first meeting held on the notification date but prior to its publication in the Gazette. "The newly-elected Council has already functioned with its President and Vice President for just over a year and has taken several decisions in the interregnum," the court observed, highlighting the potential disruptive impact of upholding the technical challenge at this stage.

Concluding the judgment, the court did not find any gross illegality in the election process of the West Bengal Medical Council. As a result, W.P.A. No.14447 of 2023 was dismissed, maintaining the status quo in the Council's functioning. This decision underscores the judiciary's approach in balancing technical compliance with practical realities in the administration of organizational elections.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

KUNAL SAHA VS REGISTRAR, WEST BENGAL MEDICAL COUNCIL (WBMC) and Another

Latest Legal News