Wife Not Entitled to Maintenance When Financially Secure and Dishonest: Punjab & Haryana High Court Boycott of Courts Violates Litigants’ Right to Speedy Justice: Rajasthan High Court Slams Lawyers' Strike Over Working Saturdays Order VI Rule 17 CPC | Proviso Cannot Defeat the Main Provision Which Allows Amendment ‘At Any Stage of Proceedings’: Karnataka High Court Knife Used To Enlarge Child’s Vagina Before Rape: Madhya Pradesh High Court Affirms Death Sentence In ‘Rarest Of Rare’ Case 47 BNSS | Mere Mention of Offence and Sections Is Not Disclosure of Grounds of Arrest: Allahabad High Court Quashes Arrest for Failure to Furnish Written Grounds Quasi-Judicial Officers Aren’t Criminals For Passing Orders: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Against Executive Officer In Mutation Dispute Sections 215 & 379 BNSS | Police Cannot Register FIR Without Judicial Satisfaction Where Alleged Offence Relates to Court Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court Magistrate Empowered To Try Drug Offence Under Section 27(d) Despite It Falling Under Chapter IV: J&K High Court Information Commission Has No Power To Impose Blanket Ban On RTI Applications: Orissa High Court Strikes Down Restriction On Filing Future RTIs Anticipatory Bail Is Not a Shield for Crimes That Threaten Communal Harmony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Bail Plea in Beef Possession Case Drug And Cosmetic Act | Sample Testing Must Be Completed Within 60 Days Under Rule 45 – Delay Vitiates Entire Prosecution: Bombay High Court 156(3) CrPC | Handwriting Expert's Report May Not Be Final – But It’s Sufficient to Initiate Investigation: Delhi High Court 217 CrPC | Alteration of Charges Is Not a Mere Formality: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Dowry Death Conviction Maintenance Is Not a Charity, It's an Implied Right: Chhattisgarh High Court Cancels Gift Deed for Denial of Care to Elderly Donors Minor Inconsistencies Can't Overturn Disability Claims: Bombay High Court imposes ₹2 lakh costs on HDFC Justice Must Not Be a Casualty of Clerical Oversight: AP High Court Last Seen Is Not Last Word – Circumstantial Evidence Must Be Complete and Compelling: Allahabad High Court Nomination Has Sanctity—Succession Certificate Not Mandatory When Valid Nominee Exists: Supreme Court in GPF Dispute

Technical Irregularities Not Enough to Invalidate WB Medical Council Election: Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court at Calcutta, led by Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, dismissed a petition challenging the election of the President and Vice President of the West Bengal Medical Council (W.B.M.C.). The court emphasized, "The principle of factum valet also comes into play, since there was no substantial illegality in the first meeting of the members of the newly elected Council."

Dr. Kunal Saha, an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI), had raised objections over the procedural conduct of the Council's election, alleging violations of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914. The petitioner argued that the meeting and election held on November 1, 2022, were before the official Gazette notification date, thus violating Sections 11A and 11B of the Act.

The court carefully examined the petitioner's locus standi as an OCI cardholder under Sections 7A and 7B of the Citizenship Act, 1955, and Section 4 of the Bengal Medical Act, 1914. Justice Bhattacharyya noted, "The petitioner, being a registered medical practitioner having the right to practice in West Bengal, definitely has a right to so practice in an unfettered and proper manner."

In addressing the legal interpretation of the term "notification" within the Bengal Medical Act, the court found no significant illegality in the Council's first meeting held on the notification date but prior to its publication in the Gazette. "The newly-elected Council has already functioned with its President and Vice President for just over a year and has taken several decisions in the interregnum," the court observed, highlighting the potential disruptive impact of upholding the technical challenge at this stage.

Concluding the judgment, the court did not find any gross illegality in the election process of the West Bengal Medical Council. As a result, W.P.A. No.14447 of 2023 was dismissed, maintaining the status quo in the Council's functioning. This decision underscores the judiciary's approach in balancing technical compliance with practical realities in the administration of organizational elections.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

KUNAL SAHA VS REGISTRAR, WEST BENGAL MEDICAL COUNCIL (WBMC) and Another

Latest Legal News