POCSO Presumption Is Not a Dead Letter, But ‘Sterling Witness’ Test Still Governs Conviction: Bombay High Court High Courts Cannot Routinely Entertain Contempt Petitions Beyond One Year: Madras High Court Declines Contempt Plea Filed After Four Years Courts Cannot Reject Suit by Weighing Evidence at Threshold: Delhi High Court Restores Discrimination Suit by Indian Staff Against Italian Embassy Improvised Testimonies and Dubious Recovery Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Sale with Repurchase Condition is Not a Mortgage: Bombay High Court Reverses Redemption Decree After 27-Year Delay Second Transfer Application on Same Grounds is Not Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Legal Position under Section 24 CPC Partnership Act | Eviction Suit by Unregistered Firm Maintainable if Based on Statutory Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Violation of Income Tax Law Doesn’t Void Cheque Bounce Offence: Supreme Court Overrules Kerala HC, Says Section 138 NI Act Stands Independent Overstaying Licensee Cannot Evade Double Damages by Legal Technicalities: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Is Not a Stamp of Truth: Punjab & Haryana High Court Trademark Law Must Protect Reputation, Not Reward Delay Tactics: Bombay High Court Grants Injunction to FedEx Against Dishonest Use of Its Well-Known Mark Commercial Dispute Need Not Wait for a Written Contract: Delhi High Court Upholds Rs.6 Lakh Decree in Rent Recovery Suit Against Storage Defaulter Limitation Begins From Refusal, Not Date of Agreement—Especially When Title Was Under Litigation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sale by Karta of Ancestral Property Without Legal Necessity Is Voidable, Not Void: Madras High Court Dismisses Sons’ Appeal Demand for Gold at 'Chhoochhak' Ceremony Not Dowry – Demand Must Connected With Marriage: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claims Cannot Be Decided on Sympathy – Involvement of Offending Vehicle Must Be Proved: Supreme Court Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Ladder for Career Advancement – It Ends Once Exercised: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Estoppel in Release Deed Case, Denies Claimants' Share in Separate Property

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India upheld the principle of estoppel in a case involving a Release Deed, ruling that the claimants were estopped from staking a claim to a share in the separate property of their grandfather. The court's decision reinforces the significance of equitable principles in determining property rights and highlights the importance of understanding the legal consequences of executing such deeds.

The case revolved around Shri Sengalani Chettiar, who had two marriages, and the appellants, who were the sons of Shri Chandran, the son from the first marriage. The disputed property, identified as separate property of Shri Sengalani Chettiar, became the subject of contention when Shri Chandran executed a Release Deed relinquishing his share in the property. The Release Deed, executed with valuable consideration, aimed to protect the interests of a mentally ill son born from Shri Sengalani Chettiar's second marriage.

The court examined the validity of the Release Deed and its effect on the claimants' right to inherit the property. It held that although the deed itself may not have resulted in a lawful transfer, Shri Chandran's conduct, coupled with the receipt of consideration, created an estoppel. The court found that the intention of Shri Chettiar was to cut off the claimants' inheritance rights and secure the interest of his son from the second marriage.

Supreme court stated, "The very fact that Shri Chettiar did not execute any document by way of Will only shows that he proceeded on the basis that the branch represented by Shri Chandran was being cut off from inheritance from the property in question." It further emphasized that the appellants, being children of the predeceased son, could not claim immunity from the operation of the Principle of Estoppel under Section 8(a) of the Hindu Succession Act.

The court's decision underscores the importance of understanding the consequences of executing Release Deeds and the legal principles governing property rights. It affirms the principle that equitable estoppel can bar a party from asserting a right to property when their conduct and the receipt of valuable consideration create an estoppel. This judgment serves as a reminder of the need to carefully consider the implications of such legal documents in property transactions and inheritances.

Date of Decision: January 25, 2023

ELUMALAI @ VENKATESAN & ANR  vs M. KAMALA AND ORS. & ETC. 

Latest Legal News