MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Upholds Estoppel in Release Deed Case, Denies Claimants' Share in Separate Property

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India upheld the principle of estoppel in a case involving a Release Deed, ruling that the claimants were estopped from staking a claim to a share in the separate property of their grandfather. The court's decision reinforces the significance of equitable principles in determining property rights and highlights the importance of understanding the legal consequences of executing such deeds.

The case revolved around Shri Sengalani Chettiar, who had two marriages, and the appellants, who were the sons of Shri Chandran, the son from the first marriage. The disputed property, identified as separate property of Shri Sengalani Chettiar, became the subject of contention when Shri Chandran executed a Release Deed relinquishing his share in the property. The Release Deed, executed with valuable consideration, aimed to protect the interests of a mentally ill son born from Shri Sengalani Chettiar's second marriage.

The court examined the validity of the Release Deed and its effect on the claimants' right to inherit the property. It held that although the deed itself may not have resulted in a lawful transfer, Shri Chandran's conduct, coupled with the receipt of consideration, created an estoppel. The court found that the intention of Shri Chettiar was to cut off the claimants' inheritance rights and secure the interest of his son from the second marriage.

Supreme court stated, "The very fact that Shri Chettiar did not execute any document by way of Will only shows that he proceeded on the basis that the branch represented by Shri Chandran was being cut off from inheritance from the property in question." It further emphasized that the appellants, being children of the predeceased son, could not claim immunity from the operation of the Principle of Estoppel under Section 8(a) of the Hindu Succession Act.

The court's decision underscores the importance of understanding the consequences of executing Release Deeds and the legal principles governing property rights. It affirms the principle that equitable estoppel can bar a party from asserting a right to property when their conduct and the receipt of valuable consideration create an estoppel. This judgment serves as a reminder of the need to carefully consider the implications of such legal documents in property transactions and inheritances.

Date of Decision: January 25, 2023

ELUMALAI @ VENKATESAN & ANR  vs M. KAMALA AND ORS. & ETC. 

Latest Legal News