At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Suspends Sentence in Conspiracy and Murder Case on Humanitarian Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India suspended the sentence of an applicant involved in a conspiracy and murder case, highlighting humanitarian considerations. The decision was rendered by the bench of HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA on October 3, 2023.

The case involved the applicant's conviction, along with co-accused, for hatching a conspiracy and committing murder. According to the prosecution, the conspiracy revolved around eliminating the deceased, who was allegedly having an affair with one of the co-accused. The tragic incident unfolded when the deceased was called to a house and served an intoxicating drink, subsequently leading to his murder.

The Trial Court had convicted the applicant and co-accused under Sections 302, 120B, and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), sentencing them to life imprisonment. All three accused had appealed to the High Court, where the applicant's appeal was dismissed, while one co-accused was granted the benefit of doubt.

The Supreme Court, in its observation, took into account the applicant's custody period, which amounted to 10 years and 9 months, as well as the urgent medical needs of his newborn daughter. Recognizing the humanitarian aspects, the Court allowed the suspension of the applicant's sentence and directed his release on bail.

In a significant statement, the Court remarked, "Taking into consideration all the attending circumstances but without expressing any views on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and the sentence awarded to the applicant/appellant is suspended and he is directed to be released on bail."

This decision by the Supreme Court underscores the judiciary's commitment to considering humanitarian grounds while ensuring justice is served. It serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between justice and compassion in legal proceedings.

Representing the applicant were a team of dedicated advocates, including Mr. Ishan Kapoor, Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Mr. Joginder Tuli, Ms. Joshini Tuli, Mr. Lalit Khanna, and Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal. The respondents were represented by Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Ishan Kapoor, Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Mr. Joginder Tuli, Ms. Joshini Tuli, and Mr. Lalit Khanna.

This decision sets a precedent for the consideration of humanitarian factors in similar cases, reaffirming the importance of empathy in the legal system.

Date of Decision: 03-10-2023

KHADAK PRASAD  vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.         

Latest Legal News