Medical Report Missing Injured's Signature, Unexplained 9-Hour FIR Delay Fatal To Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Acquits Attempt To Murder Convicts Fresh Notice Mandatory To Ex-Parte Defendants If Plaint Is Substantively Amended: Madhya Pradesh High Court Divorce | Initial Bickering Between Spouses During Early Marriage Does Not Constitute Cruelty: Madras High Court Sports Council Cannot Dissolve Registered Society Or Conduct Its Elections; Can Only Withdraw Recognition: Kerala High Court Incarceration Without Trial Amounts To Punishment: Himachal Pradesh HC Grants Bail To Murder Accused Denied Medical Care In Jail Compliance Is Not Protection: Kerala High Court Holds Local Authority Cannot Deny Industrial License Merely Over Unscientific Public Protests Allotment Of Seat By Bypassing Higher-Ranked Candidates In Merit List Results In Gross Injustice: Calcutta High Court Dismisses LLM Admission Plea Blacklisting Not An Automatic Consequence Of Contract Termination, Requires Specific Show-Cause Notice: Supreme Court Power Of Attorney Cannot Operate As Mode Of Succession To Religious Office Of Sajjadanashin: Supreme Court Higher-Ranking Employees Cannot Claim Parity In Punishment With Subordinates Under Article 14: Supreme Court Waqf Board Lacks Jurisdiction To Appoint 'Sajjadanashin', Civil Court Can Decide Dispute As Office Is Distinct From 'Mutawalli': Supreme Court 144 BNSS | Husband Cannot Directly Challenge Ex-Parte Maintenance Order In High Court, Must Apply For Recall: Allahabad High Court No Absolute Bar On Relying Upon Post-Notification Sale Deeds For Determining Land Acquisition Compensation: Bombay High Court 138 NI Act | Plea That Cheque Was Stolen Is An Afterthought If No Police Complaint Is Lodged: Orissa High Court Upholds Conviction Cannot Expect Claimant To Preserve Every Bill: P&H High Court Enhances Accident Compensation From Rs 95,000 To Rs 7.7 Lakhs Auction Sale Remains 'Inchoate' If 75% Balance Paid Beyond Statutory Time, Borrower Can Redeem Property: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Suspends Sentence in Conspiracy and Murder Case on Humanitarian Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India suspended the sentence of an applicant involved in a conspiracy and murder case, highlighting humanitarian considerations. The decision was rendered by the bench of HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA on October 3, 2023.

The case involved the applicant's conviction, along with co-accused, for hatching a conspiracy and committing murder. According to the prosecution, the conspiracy revolved around eliminating the deceased, who was allegedly having an affair with one of the co-accused. The tragic incident unfolded when the deceased was called to a house and served an intoxicating drink, subsequently leading to his murder.

The Trial Court had convicted the applicant and co-accused under Sections 302, 120B, and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), sentencing them to life imprisonment. All three accused had appealed to the High Court, where the applicant's appeal was dismissed, while one co-accused was granted the benefit of doubt.

The Supreme Court, in its observation, took into account the applicant's custody period, which amounted to 10 years and 9 months, as well as the urgent medical needs of his newborn daughter. Recognizing the humanitarian aspects, the Court allowed the suspension of the applicant's sentence and directed his release on bail.

In a significant statement, the Court remarked, "Taking into consideration all the attending circumstances but without expressing any views on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and the sentence awarded to the applicant/appellant is suspended and he is directed to be released on bail."

This decision by the Supreme Court underscores the judiciary's commitment to considering humanitarian grounds while ensuring justice is served. It serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between justice and compassion in legal proceedings.

Representing the applicant were a team of dedicated advocates, including Mr. Ishan Kapoor, Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Mr. Joginder Tuli, Ms. Joshini Tuli, Mr. Lalit Khanna, and Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal. The respondents were represented by Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Ishan Kapoor, Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Mr. Joginder Tuli, Ms. Joshini Tuli, and Mr. Lalit Khanna.

This decision sets a precedent for the consideration of humanitarian factors in similar cases, reaffirming the importance of empathy in the legal system.

Date of Decision: 03-10-2023

KHADAK PRASAD  vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.         

Latest Legal News