Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Suspends Sentence in Conspiracy and Murder Case on Humanitarian Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India suspended the sentence of an applicant involved in a conspiracy and murder case, highlighting humanitarian considerations. The decision was rendered by the bench of HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA on October 3, 2023.

The case involved the applicant's conviction, along with co-accused, for hatching a conspiracy and committing murder. According to the prosecution, the conspiracy revolved around eliminating the deceased, who was allegedly having an affair with one of the co-accused. The tragic incident unfolded when the deceased was called to a house and served an intoxicating drink, subsequently leading to his murder.

The Trial Court had convicted the applicant and co-accused under Sections 302, 120B, and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), sentencing them to life imprisonment. All three accused had appealed to the High Court, where the applicant's appeal was dismissed, while one co-accused was granted the benefit of doubt.

The Supreme Court, in its observation, took into account the applicant's custody period, which amounted to 10 years and 9 months, as well as the urgent medical needs of his newborn daughter. Recognizing the humanitarian aspects, the Court allowed the suspension of the applicant's sentence and directed his release on bail.

In a significant statement, the Court remarked, "Taking into consideration all the attending circumstances but without expressing any views on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and the sentence awarded to the applicant/appellant is suspended and he is directed to be released on bail."

This decision by the Supreme Court underscores the judiciary's commitment to considering humanitarian grounds while ensuring justice is served. It serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between justice and compassion in legal proceedings.

Representing the applicant were a team of dedicated advocates, including Mr. Ishan Kapoor, Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Mr. Joginder Tuli, Ms. Joshini Tuli, Mr. Lalit Khanna, and Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal. The respondents were represented by Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Ishan Kapoor, Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Mr. Joginder Tuli, Ms. Joshini Tuli, and Mr. Lalit Khanna.

This decision sets a precedent for the consideration of humanitarian factors in similar cases, reaffirming the importance of empathy in the legal system.

Date of Decision: 03-10-2023

KHADAK PRASAD  vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.         

Latest Legal News