Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Sets Aside Penalties Imposed by Odisha State Government in Extension of Time Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the penalties imposed by the State Government of Odisha in a case involving the extension of time for a road improvement project. The Court ruled that the State Government was not justified in levying penalties on contractors who failed to complete their work within the stipulated time. The judgment, delivered by Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, emphasized that the imposition of penalties while granting an extension of time was illegal and without authority of the law.

Supreme Court stated, "Levy of penalty while granting extension of time is wholly without authority of the law and is illegal." The Court further emphasized that the relevant clause invoked by the State Government did not apply to cases where the contract was extended but rather related to the termination of a contract. Additionally, the Court noted that there was no provision in the contract or the Odisha Public Work Dept. Code (OPWD Code) authorizing the imposition of penalties while granting an extension of time.

The case before the Court involved Civil Appeal No. 4934 of 2022 arising from a writ petition filed by a special class contractor who was awarded a road improvement contract. The contractor failed to complete the work within the specified time frame and applied for an extension, which was granted by the State Government subject to the imposition of a penalty. The High Court had set aside the penalty, a decision that was upheld by the Supreme Court.

The Court also highlighted the importance of providing an opportunity for the contractor to be heard before levying a penalty, stating, "The contractor must be put to notice that extension of time can be granted on imposition of reasonable penalty. However, without putting the contractor to notice, unilaterally, the State is not justified in levying the penalty while granting extension of time."

This landmark judgment clarifies the legal position regarding the imposition of penalties in cases of time extension for contract completion. It ensures that contractors are not unduly burdened with penalties without proper notice and an opportunity to present their case. The decision will have far-reaching implications for similar cases and is expected to promote fairness and equity in contractual relationships between the State Government and contractors.

The Supreme Court's ruling will serve as a precedent and guide future decisions concerning penalties imposed during contract extensions, setting a standard that upholds the principles of natural justice and contract law.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

The State of Odisha & Ors. VS Radheshyam Agrawal

Latest Legal News