POCSO Presumption Is Not a Dead Letter, But ‘Sterling Witness’ Test Still Governs Conviction: Bombay High Court High Courts Cannot Routinely Entertain Contempt Petitions Beyond One Year: Madras High Court Declines Contempt Plea Filed After Four Years Courts Cannot Reject Suit by Weighing Evidence at Threshold: Delhi High Court Restores Discrimination Suit by Indian Staff Against Italian Embassy Improvised Testimonies and Dubious Recovery Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Sale with Repurchase Condition is Not a Mortgage: Bombay High Court Reverses Redemption Decree After 27-Year Delay Second Transfer Application on Same Grounds is Not Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Legal Position under Section 24 CPC Partnership Act | Eviction Suit by Unregistered Firm Maintainable if Based on Statutory Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Violation of Income Tax Law Doesn’t Void Cheque Bounce Offence: Supreme Court Overrules Kerala HC, Says Section 138 NI Act Stands Independent Overstaying Licensee Cannot Evade Double Damages by Legal Technicalities: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Is Not a Stamp of Truth: Punjab & Haryana High Court Trademark Law Must Protect Reputation, Not Reward Delay Tactics: Bombay High Court Grants Injunction to FedEx Against Dishonest Use of Its Well-Known Mark Commercial Dispute Need Not Wait for a Written Contract: Delhi High Court Upholds Rs.6 Lakh Decree in Rent Recovery Suit Against Storage Defaulter Limitation Begins From Refusal, Not Date of Agreement—Especially When Title Was Under Litigation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sale by Karta of Ancestral Property Without Legal Necessity Is Voidable, Not Void: Madras High Court Dismisses Sons’ Appeal Demand for Gold at 'Chhoochhak' Ceremony Not Dowry – Demand Must Connected With Marriage: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claims Cannot Be Decided on Sympathy – Involvement of Offending Vehicle Must Be Proved: Supreme Court Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Ladder for Career Advancement – It Ends Once Exercised: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Penalties Imposed by Odisha State Government in Extension of Time Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the penalties imposed by the State Government of Odisha in a case involving the extension of time for a road improvement project. The Court ruled that the State Government was not justified in levying penalties on contractors who failed to complete their work within the stipulated time. The judgment, delivered by Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, emphasized that the imposition of penalties while granting an extension of time was illegal and without authority of the law.

Supreme Court stated, "Levy of penalty while granting extension of time is wholly without authority of the law and is illegal." The Court further emphasized that the relevant clause invoked by the State Government did not apply to cases where the contract was extended but rather related to the termination of a contract. Additionally, the Court noted that there was no provision in the contract or the Odisha Public Work Dept. Code (OPWD Code) authorizing the imposition of penalties while granting an extension of time.

The case before the Court involved Civil Appeal No. 4934 of 2022 arising from a writ petition filed by a special class contractor who was awarded a road improvement contract. The contractor failed to complete the work within the specified time frame and applied for an extension, which was granted by the State Government subject to the imposition of a penalty. The High Court had set aside the penalty, a decision that was upheld by the Supreme Court.

The Court also highlighted the importance of providing an opportunity for the contractor to be heard before levying a penalty, stating, "The contractor must be put to notice that extension of time can be granted on imposition of reasonable penalty. However, without putting the contractor to notice, unilaterally, the State is not justified in levying the penalty while granting extension of time."

This landmark judgment clarifies the legal position regarding the imposition of penalties in cases of time extension for contract completion. It ensures that contractors are not unduly burdened with penalties without proper notice and an opportunity to present their case. The decision will have far-reaching implications for similar cases and is expected to promote fairness and equity in contractual relationships between the State Government and contractors.

The Supreme Court's ruling will serve as a precedent and guide future decisions concerning penalties imposed during contract extensions, setting a standard that upholds the principles of natural justice and contract law.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

The State of Odisha & Ors. VS Radheshyam Agrawal

Latest Legal News