Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Supreme Court Sets Aside Penalties Imposed by Odisha State Government in Extension of Time Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the penalties imposed by the State Government of Odisha in a case involving the extension of time for a road improvement project. The Court ruled that the State Government was not justified in levying penalties on contractors who failed to complete their work within the stipulated time. The judgment, delivered by Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, emphasized that the imposition of penalties while granting an extension of time was illegal and without authority of the law.

Supreme Court stated, "Levy of penalty while granting extension of time is wholly without authority of the law and is illegal." The Court further emphasized that the relevant clause invoked by the State Government did not apply to cases where the contract was extended but rather related to the termination of a contract. Additionally, the Court noted that there was no provision in the contract or the Odisha Public Work Dept. Code (OPWD Code) authorizing the imposition of penalties while granting an extension of time.

The case before the Court involved Civil Appeal No. 4934 of 2022 arising from a writ petition filed by a special class contractor who was awarded a road improvement contract. The contractor failed to complete the work within the specified time frame and applied for an extension, which was granted by the State Government subject to the imposition of a penalty. The High Court had set aside the penalty, a decision that was upheld by the Supreme Court.

The Court also highlighted the importance of providing an opportunity for the contractor to be heard before levying a penalty, stating, "The contractor must be put to notice that extension of time can be granted on imposition of reasonable penalty. However, without putting the contractor to notice, unilaterally, the State is not justified in levying the penalty while granting extension of time."

This landmark judgment clarifies the legal position regarding the imposition of penalties in cases of time extension for contract completion. It ensures that contractors are not unduly burdened with penalties without proper notice and an opportunity to present their case. The decision will have far-reaching implications for similar cases and is expected to promote fairness and equity in contractual relationships between the State Government and contractors.

The Supreme Court's ruling will serve as a precedent and guide future decisions concerning penalties imposed during contract extensions, setting a standard that upholds the principles of natural justice and contract law.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

The State of Odisha & Ors. VS Radheshyam Agrawal

Latest Legal News