Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLAT and NCLT Orders in ACIL Insolvency Case, Upholds CoC’s Commercial Wisdom

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, overturned the decisions of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in the matter of Ramkrishna Forgings Limited v. Ravindra Loonkar, Resolution Professional of ACIL Limited & Anr. The apex court’s bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, allowed the appeal filed by Ramkrishna Forgings Limited, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial intervention in commercial decisions made during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). 

In its judgment, the Supreme Court observed, “The moot question involved is the extent of the jurisdiction and powers of the Adjudicating Authority to go on the issue of revaluation.” The Court highlighted that the Adjudicating Authority’s jurisdiction under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is strictly structured by the provisions of the Code, particularly under Sections 30 and 31. The Court noted, “The jurisdiction of the adjudicating authority and the appellate authority cannot extend into entering upon merits of a business decision made by a requisite majority of the CoC in its commercial wisdom.”

The case revolved around the insolvency resolution of ACIL Limited, a prominent manufacturer of precision engineering and automobile components. The resolution plan proposed by Ramkrishna Forgings Limited had been approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) but was kept in abeyance by the NCLT, which directed a re-valuation of the corporate debtor’s assets. This decision was later upheld by the NCLAT.

The Supreme Court’s decision underscored the supremacy of the commercial wisdom of the CoC, stating that “the CoC’s decision-making process in approving Resolution Plans is not subject to unnecessary judicial scrutiny and intervention.” The judgment also clarified the role of the Official Liquidator in valuation, stating that their involvement for re-valuation is not aligned with the Code’s framework, which has a specific mechanism for valuation under CIRP Regulations.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

 

RAMKRISHNA FORGINGS LIMITED VS RAVINDRA LOONKAR, RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL OF ACIL LIMITED & ANR.

 

Latest Legal News