Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLAT and NCLT Orders in ACIL Insolvency Case, Upholds CoC’s Commercial Wisdom

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, overturned the decisions of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in the matter of Ramkrishna Forgings Limited v. Ravindra Loonkar, Resolution Professional of ACIL Limited & Anr. The apex court’s bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, allowed the appeal filed by Ramkrishna Forgings Limited, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial intervention in commercial decisions made during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). 

In its judgment, the Supreme Court observed, “The moot question involved is the extent of the jurisdiction and powers of the Adjudicating Authority to go on the issue of revaluation.” The Court highlighted that the Adjudicating Authority’s jurisdiction under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is strictly structured by the provisions of the Code, particularly under Sections 30 and 31. The Court noted, “The jurisdiction of the adjudicating authority and the appellate authority cannot extend into entering upon merits of a business decision made by a requisite majority of the CoC in its commercial wisdom.”

The case revolved around the insolvency resolution of ACIL Limited, a prominent manufacturer of precision engineering and automobile components. The resolution plan proposed by Ramkrishna Forgings Limited had been approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) but was kept in abeyance by the NCLT, which directed a re-valuation of the corporate debtor’s assets. This decision was later upheld by the NCLAT.

The Supreme Court’s decision underscored the supremacy of the commercial wisdom of the CoC, stating that “the CoC’s decision-making process in approving Resolution Plans is not subject to unnecessary judicial scrutiny and intervention.” The judgment also clarified the role of the Official Liquidator in valuation, stating that their involvement for re-valuation is not aligned with the Code’s framework, which has a specific mechanism for valuation under CIRP Regulations.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

 

RAMKRISHNA FORGINGS LIMITED VS RAVINDRA LOONKAR, RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL OF ACIL LIMITED & ANR.

 

Latest Legal News