Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLAT and NCLT Orders in ACIL Insolvency Case, Upholds CoC’s Commercial Wisdom

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, overturned the decisions of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in the matter of Ramkrishna Forgings Limited v. Ravindra Loonkar, Resolution Professional of ACIL Limited & Anr. The apex court’s bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, allowed the appeal filed by Ramkrishna Forgings Limited, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial intervention in commercial decisions made during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). 

In its judgment, the Supreme Court observed, “The moot question involved is the extent of the jurisdiction and powers of the Adjudicating Authority to go on the issue of revaluation.” The Court highlighted that the Adjudicating Authority’s jurisdiction under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is strictly structured by the provisions of the Code, particularly under Sections 30 and 31. The Court noted, “The jurisdiction of the adjudicating authority and the appellate authority cannot extend into entering upon merits of a business decision made by a requisite majority of the CoC in its commercial wisdom.”

The case revolved around the insolvency resolution of ACIL Limited, a prominent manufacturer of precision engineering and automobile components. The resolution plan proposed by Ramkrishna Forgings Limited had been approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) but was kept in abeyance by the NCLT, which directed a re-valuation of the corporate debtor’s assets. This decision was later upheld by the NCLAT.

The Supreme Court’s decision underscored the supremacy of the commercial wisdom of the CoC, stating that “the CoC’s decision-making process in approving Resolution Plans is not subject to unnecessary judicial scrutiny and intervention.” The judgment also clarified the role of the Official Liquidator in valuation, stating that their involvement for re-valuation is not aligned with the Code’s framework, which has a specific mechanism for valuation under CIRP Regulations.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

 

RAMKRISHNA FORGINGS LIMITED VS RAVINDRA LOONKAR, RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL OF ACIL LIMITED & ANR.

 

Latest Legal News