Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Quashing of Final Report in Car Accident Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India has overturned the quashing of a final report in a car accident case by the High Court. The case involved a car accident that resulted in multiple deaths, and the final report had concluded that the accident was unavoidable and not due to negligence on the part of the deceased. The High Court had quashed the report, attributing negligence to the deceased.

In its judgement, the Supreme Court criticized the High Court's approach, stating, "The opinions expressed which are in the nature of findings while considering the correctness or otherwise of the final report submitted on further investigation of the case and thereby quashing the same is, in our view, not a correct and proper approach adopted by the High Court."

The Supreme Court further clarified that the quashing of the report would not impact the criminal proceeding as it had already abated due to the death of the accused. However, the Court emphasized that in the pending compensation claim petitions, the burden of proving negligence lies on the claimants, and it should be established based on preponderance of possibilities, not proof beyond reasonable doubt.

"It is for the Appellant herein to establish negligence on the part of the driver of the tanker lorry in the petition filed by him seeking compensation on account of the death of his son in the said accident," the judgement stated.

The Court also referred to previous cases, highlighting that in compensation claim petitions, the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt does not apply, and the claimants must establish their case based on preponderance of probabilities.

Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeal. The opinion in the final report was deemed to have no bearing on the compensation claim petitions. Each party was directed to bear their respective costs.

This judgement provides clarity on the burden of proof in compensation claim petitions arising from car accidents and emphasizes the need for a holistic evaluation of evidence to determine negligence.                                                             

Date of Decision: July 13, 2023

Mathew Alexander  vs Mohammed Shafi and Anr.

Latest Legal News