Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Quashing of Final Report in Car Accident Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India has overturned the quashing of a final report in a car accident case by the High Court. The case involved a car accident that resulted in multiple deaths, and the final report had concluded that the accident was unavoidable and not due to negligence on the part of the deceased. The High Court had quashed the report, attributing negligence to the deceased.

In its judgement, the Supreme Court criticized the High Court's approach, stating, "The opinions expressed which are in the nature of findings while considering the correctness or otherwise of the final report submitted on further investigation of the case and thereby quashing the same is, in our view, not a correct and proper approach adopted by the High Court."

The Supreme Court further clarified that the quashing of the report would not impact the criminal proceeding as it had already abated due to the death of the accused. However, the Court emphasized that in the pending compensation claim petitions, the burden of proving negligence lies on the claimants, and it should be established based on preponderance of possibilities, not proof beyond reasonable doubt.

"It is for the Appellant herein to establish negligence on the part of the driver of the tanker lorry in the petition filed by him seeking compensation on account of the death of his son in the said accident," the judgement stated.

The Court also referred to previous cases, highlighting that in compensation claim petitions, the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt does not apply, and the claimants must establish their case based on preponderance of probabilities.

Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeal. The opinion in the final report was deemed to have no bearing on the compensation claim petitions. Each party was directed to bear their respective costs.

This judgement provides clarity on the burden of proof in compensation claim petitions arising from car accidents and emphasizes the need for a holistic evaluation of evidence to determine negligence.                                                             

Date of Decision: July 13, 2023

Mathew Alexander  vs Mohammed Shafi and Anr.

Latest Legal News