Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Quashing of Final Report in Car Accident Case

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India has overturned the quashing of a final report in a car accident case by the High Court. The case involved a car accident that resulted in multiple deaths, and the final report had concluded that the accident was unavoidable and not due to negligence on the part of the deceased. The High Court had quashed the report, attributing negligence to the deceased.

In its judgement, the Supreme Court criticized the High Court's approach, stating, "The opinions expressed which are in the nature of findings while considering the correctness or otherwise of the final report submitted on further investigation of the case and thereby quashing the same is, in our view, not a correct and proper approach adopted by the High Court."

The Supreme Court further clarified that the quashing of the report would not impact the criminal proceeding as it had already abated due to the death of the accused. However, the Court emphasized that in the pending compensation claim petitions, the burden of proving negligence lies on the claimants, and it should be established based on preponderance of possibilities, not proof beyond reasonable doubt.

"It is for the Appellant herein to establish negligence on the part of the driver of the tanker lorry in the petition filed by him seeking compensation on account of the death of his son in the said accident," the judgement stated.

The Court also referred to previous cases, highlighting that in compensation claim petitions, the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt does not apply, and the claimants must establish their case based on preponderance of probabilities.

Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeal. The opinion in the final report was deemed to have no bearing on the compensation claim petitions. Each party was directed to bear their respective costs.

This judgement provides clarity on the burden of proof in compensation claim petitions arising from car accidents and emphasizes the need for a holistic evaluation of evidence to determine negligence.                                                             

Date of Decision: July 13, 2023

Mathew Alexander  vs Mohammed Shafi and Anr.

Latest Legal News