Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Supreme Court Remands Charitable Trust's Tax Exemption Eligibility Case for Fresh Consideration, Stresses Examination of Nature of Receipts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has remanded a case back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration regarding the eligibility of a charitable trust for income tax exemption. The court emphasized the importance of re-examining the nature of receipts and referred to the need for a comprehensive analysis in determining the trust's exemption status. The judgment, delivered by Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, highlighted the impact of recent changes in the interpretation of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case, titled "Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. Servants of People Society," involved a dispute over the exemption claimed by the Servants of People Society, a registered charitable trust. The trust had sought exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act but faced denial from the revenue authorities, who argued that the trust's involvement in trade, commerce, and business activities rendered it ineligible for exemption.

The court's judgment quoted the earlier ruling in CIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, which set specific parameters for determining the charitable nature of activities conducted by trusts established for general public utility. The court highlighted the need for a fresh examination in light of the changed interpretation of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act.

Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, delivering the judgment, stated, "The matter requires to be re-examined, and the question as to whether the amounts received by the assessee qualify for exemption, under Section 2(15) or Section 11 needs to be gone into afresh." The court also stressed that the income, profit, or surplus derived by the trust must be incidental to its activities.

The court further noted that the trust's engagement in publishing a newspaper and earning substantial advertisement revenue required a careful analysis of whether such activities could be considered trade, commerce, or business. The judgment cited the importance of fulfilling the conditions specified in the proviso to Section 2(15) and emphasized that the quantitative limits for receipts should not be exceeded.

Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the documents and relevant papers, and pass fresh orders within four months.

Date of Decision: January 31, 2023

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) DELHI   vs  SERVANTS OF PEOPLE SOCIETY 

Latest Legal News