Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Remands Charitable Trust's Tax Exemption Eligibility Case for Fresh Consideration, Stresses Examination of Nature of Receipts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has remanded a case back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration regarding the eligibility of a charitable trust for income tax exemption. The court emphasized the importance of re-examining the nature of receipts and referred to the need for a comprehensive analysis in determining the trust's exemption status. The judgment, delivered by Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, highlighted the impact of recent changes in the interpretation of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case, titled "Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. Servants of People Society," involved a dispute over the exemption claimed by the Servants of People Society, a registered charitable trust. The trust had sought exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act but faced denial from the revenue authorities, who argued that the trust's involvement in trade, commerce, and business activities rendered it ineligible for exemption.

The court's judgment quoted the earlier ruling in CIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, which set specific parameters for determining the charitable nature of activities conducted by trusts established for general public utility. The court highlighted the need for a fresh examination in light of the changed interpretation of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act.

Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, delivering the judgment, stated, "The matter requires to be re-examined, and the question as to whether the amounts received by the assessee qualify for exemption, under Section 2(15) or Section 11 needs to be gone into afresh." The court also stressed that the income, profit, or surplus derived by the trust must be incidental to its activities.

The court further noted that the trust's engagement in publishing a newspaper and earning substantial advertisement revenue required a careful analysis of whether such activities could be considered trade, commerce, or business. The judgment cited the importance of fulfilling the conditions specified in the proviso to Section 2(15) and emphasized that the quantitative limits for receipts should not be exceeded.

Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the documents and relevant papers, and pass fresh orders within four months.

Date of Decision: January 31, 2023

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) DELHI   vs  SERVANTS OF PEOPLE SOCIETY 

Latest Legal News