Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Remands Charitable Trust's Tax Exemption Eligibility Case for Fresh Consideration, Stresses Examination of Nature of Receipts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has remanded a case back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration regarding the eligibility of a charitable trust for income tax exemption. The court emphasized the importance of re-examining the nature of receipts and referred to the need for a comprehensive analysis in determining the trust's exemption status. The judgment, delivered by Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, highlighted the impact of recent changes in the interpretation of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case, titled "Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. Servants of People Society," involved a dispute over the exemption claimed by the Servants of People Society, a registered charitable trust. The trust had sought exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act but faced denial from the revenue authorities, who argued that the trust's involvement in trade, commerce, and business activities rendered it ineligible for exemption.

The court's judgment quoted the earlier ruling in CIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, which set specific parameters for determining the charitable nature of activities conducted by trusts established for general public utility. The court highlighted the need for a fresh examination in light of the changed interpretation of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act.

Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, delivering the judgment, stated, "The matter requires to be re-examined, and the question as to whether the amounts received by the assessee qualify for exemption, under Section 2(15) or Section 11 needs to be gone into afresh." The court also stressed that the income, profit, or surplus derived by the trust must be incidental to its activities.

The court further noted that the trust's engagement in publishing a newspaper and earning substantial advertisement revenue required a careful analysis of whether such activities could be considered trade, commerce, or business. The judgment cited the importance of fulfilling the conditions specified in the proviso to Section 2(15) and emphasized that the quantitative limits for receipts should not be exceeded.

Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the documents and relevant papers, and pass fresh orders within four months.

Date of Decision: January 31, 2023

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) DELHI   vs  SERVANTS OF PEOPLE SOCIETY 

Latest Legal News