MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Remands Charitable Trust's Tax Exemption Eligibility Case for Fresh Consideration, Stresses Examination of Nature of Receipts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has remanded a case back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration regarding the eligibility of a charitable trust for income tax exemption. The court emphasized the importance of re-examining the nature of receipts and referred to the need for a comprehensive analysis in determining the trust's exemption status. The judgment, delivered by Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, highlighted the impact of recent changes in the interpretation of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case, titled "Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. Servants of People Society," involved a dispute over the exemption claimed by the Servants of People Society, a registered charitable trust. The trust had sought exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act but faced denial from the revenue authorities, who argued that the trust's involvement in trade, commerce, and business activities rendered it ineligible for exemption.

The court's judgment quoted the earlier ruling in CIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, which set specific parameters for determining the charitable nature of activities conducted by trusts established for general public utility. The court highlighted the need for a fresh examination in light of the changed interpretation of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act.

Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, delivering the judgment, stated, "The matter requires to be re-examined, and the question as to whether the amounts received by the assessee qualify for exemption, under Section 2(15) or Section 11 needs to be gone into afresh." The court also stressed that the income, profit, or surplus derived by the trust must be incidental to its activities.

The court further noted that the trust's engagement in publishing a newspaper and earning substantial advertisement revenue required a careful analysis of whether such activities could be considered trade, commerce, or business. The judgment cited the importance of fulfilling the conditions specified in the proviso to Section 2(15) and emphasized that the quantitative limits for receipts should not be exceeded.

Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the documents and relevant papers, and pass fresh orders within four months.

Date of Decision: January 31, 2023

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) DELHI   vs  SERVANTS OF PEOPLE SOCIETY 

Latest Legal News