Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Tender Process for Sabarimala Temple’s Aravana Prasadam; PIL Dismissed as Camouflage for Business Rivalry

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement, the Supreme Court has allowed the appeal of the Travancore Devaswom Board against the orders of the Kerala High Court, in a case involving the tender process for procuring cardamom for the preparation of Aravana Prasadam in Sabarimala Temple.

The core legal issue centered around the tendering process for procurement and the maintainability of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a business entity with vested interests.

The case originated from a dispute over the procurement process used by the Travancore Devaswom Board for obtaining cardamom. The Kerala High Court had previously directed prosecution for violation of the Food Safety and Standards Act and tagged the Board as a ‘food business operator’. However, this decision was contested by the Board in the apex court.

On the Maintainability of PIL: The Supreme Court observed, “when there is material to show that a petition styled as a public interest litigation is nothing but a camouflage to foster personal disputes, the said petition is to be thrown out.” This was pivotal in determining the non-maintainability of the PIL filed by the respondent, who was an interested party with underlying personal and commercial interests.

On Tender Process Evaluation: The court noted the efforts of the Board to procure quality cardamom, highlighting the transparent and fair nature of the tendering process. It was observed that “the decision of the appellant-Board is legal, fair and transparent.”

On Applicability of Food Safety Act: The court deemed it unnecessary to delve into whether the Board qualifies as a “food business operator” under the Food Safety and Standards Act, given the finding on the PIL’s maintainability.

The Supreme Court set aside the orders of the Kerala High Court, ruling in favor of the Travancore Devaswom Board. It was held that there was no illegality or arbitrariness in the awarding of the contract to the respondent no.

Date of Decision: March 6, 2024.

Travancore Devaswom Board vs. Ayyappa Spices & Ors.,

Latest Legal News