Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Decision for Lack of Fair Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice Principles in the Azamgarh School Land Allocation Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on March 11, 2024, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, overturned a previous decision by the Allahabad High Court regarding the allocation of land for the construction of a primary school in Azamgarh. The apex court's judgment addressed key legal points concerning public interest litigation, the role of land management committees, and adherence to the principles of natural justice.

The judgement revolved around the legality of the allocation of land for constructing a primary school, which was earlier demolished for a National Highway project. The court examined the roles and responsibilities of the Land Management Committee and the State authorities in such allocations.

The primary school in Mai Kharagpur village, Azamgarh, was demolished for a National Highway project. The villagers requested a new school, leading to the Land Management Committee proposing a land plot for construction. However, the respondents filed multiple writ petitions, eventually leading to the Allahabad High Court quashing the proposal. The appellant, Suneeta Devi, challenged this decision in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court criticized the High Court for hastily making its decision without issuing formal notices or giving a fair opportunity for all parties to be heard, thus violating principles of natural justice. The court also highlighted the misuse of Public Interest Litigation by the respondents for personal gain and noted the concealment of facts in filing successive writ petitions.

The Supreme Court quashed the Allahabad High Court's order, labeling it as suffering from "patent illegality, perversity and having been passed in sheer violation of principles of natural justice." The appeal by Suneeta Devi was allowed, reinstating the decision to allocate land for the school.

Date of Decision: March 11, 2024.

Suneeta Devi vs. Avinash and Others,

Latest Legal News