"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Decision for Lack of Fair Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice Principles in the Azamgarh School Land Allocation Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on March 11, 2024, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, overturned a previous decision by the Allahabad High Court regarding the allocation of land for the construction of a primary school in Azamgarh. The apex court's judgment addressed key legal points concerning public interest litigation, the role of land management committees, and adherence to the principles of natural justice.

The judgement revolved around the legality of the allocation of land for constructing a primary school, which was earlier demolished for a National Highway project. The court examined the roles and responsibilities of the Land Management Committee and the State authorities in such allocations.

The primary school in Mai Kharagpur village, Azamgarh, was demolished for a National Highway project. The villagers requested a new school, leading to the Land Management Committee proposing a land plot for construction. However, the respondents filed multiple writ petitions, eventually leading to the Allahabad High Court quashing the proposal. The appellant, Suneeta Devi, challenged this decision in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court criticized the High Court for hastily making its decision without issuing formal notices or giving a fair opportunity for all parties to be heard, thus violating principles of natural justice. The court also highlighted the misuse of Public Interest Litigation by the respondents for personal gain and noted the concealment of facts in filing successive writ petitions.

The Supreme Court quashed the Allahabad High Court's order, labeling it as suffering from "patent illegality, perversity and having been passed in sheer violation of principles of natural justice." The appeal by Suneeta Devi was allowed, reinstating the decision to allocate land for the school.

Date of Decision: March 11, 2024.

Suneeta Devi vs. Avinash and Others,

Similar News