Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Ongoing Investigation - Abuse of Process of Law

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has quashed an FIR (First Information Report) and ongoing investigation against the appellants, emphasizing the need to prevent the abuse of the legal process. The apex court held that the power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) to quash FIRs should be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases where the refusal to do so may result in an abuse of the process of law.

The bench comprising of Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice C.T. Ravikumar observed that the allegations in the FIR were vague and did not contain the essential ingredients to constitute the alleged offenses. Furthermore, the court noted the existence of a pending civil suit between the parties concerning the same dispute, which the respondent had failed to disclose. The court concluded that the respondent's attempt to use the criminal proceedings as a tool of harassment against the appellants amounted to an abuse of the process of the court.

Supreme court stated, "Power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to be exercised sparingly and only in rare cases where it is evident that refusal to exercise such power would result in an abuse of the process of law." The court further added, "The factual position reveals that the genesis and purpose of the criminal proceedings are nothing but the said incident, and the dispute involved is essentially of civil nature."

The Supreme Court's decision highlights the importance of carefully examining the allegations in an FIR and ensuring that they meet the necessary requirements to constitute the alleged offenses. It also emphasizes the need to prevent the misuse of criminal proceedings as a means of harassment.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the judiciary's responsibility to safeguard the principles of justice and protect individuals from malicious or baseless allegations. By quashing the FIR and all further proceedings against the appellants, the Supreme Court has upheld the integrity of the legal system and reaffirmed the importance of fair and just adjudication.

Date of Decision: January 30, 2023

Usha Chakraborty & Anr.  vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Latest Legal News