POCSO Presumption Is Not a Dead Letter, But ‘Sterling Witness’ Test Still Governs Conviction: Bombay High Court High Courts Cannot Routinely Entertain Contempt Petitions Beyond One Year: Madras High Court Declines Contempt Plea Filed After Four Years Courts Cannot Reject Suit by Weighing Evidence at Threshold: Delhi High Court Restores Discrimination Suit by Indian Staff Against Italian Embassy Improvised Testimonies and Dubious Recovery Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Sale with Repurchase Condition is Not a Mortgage: Bombay High Court Reverses Redemption Decree After 27-Year Delay Second Transfer Application on Same Grounds is Not Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Legal Position under Section 24 CPC Partnership Act | Eviction Suit by Unregistered Firm Maintainable if Based on Statutory Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Violation of Income Tax Law Doesn’t Void Cheque Bounce Offence: Supreme Court Overrules Kerala HC, Says Section 138 NI Act Stands Independent Overstaying Licensee Cannot Evade Double Damages by Legal Technicalities: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Is Not a Stamp of Truth: Punjab & Haryana High Court Trademark Law Must Protect Reputation, Not Reward Delay Tactics: Bombay High Court Grants Injunction to FedEx Against Dishonest Use of Its Well-Known Mark Commercial Dispute Need Not Wait for a Written Contract: Delhi High Court Upholds Rs.6 Lakh Decree in Rent Recovery Suit Against Storage Defaulter Limitation Begins From Refusal, Not Date of Agreement—Especially When Title Was Under Litigation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sale by Karta of Ancestral Property Without Legal Necessity Is Voidable, Not Void: Madras High Court Dismisses Sons’ Appeal Demand for Gold at 'Chhoochhak' Ceremony Not Dowry – Demand Must Connected With Marriage: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claims Cannot Be Decided on Sympathy – Involvement of Offending Vehicle Must Be Proved: Supreme Court Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Ladder for Career Advancement – It Ends Once Exercised: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Ongoing Investigation - Abuse of Process of Law

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has quashed an FIR (First Information Report) and ongoing investigation against the appellants, emphasizing the need to prevent the abuse of the legal process. The apex court held that the power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) to quash FIRs should be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases where the refusal to do so may result in an abuse of the process of law.

The bench comprising of Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice C.T. Ravikumar observed that the allegations in the FIR were vague and did not contain the essential ingredients to constitute the alleged offenses. Furthermore, the court noted the existence of a pending civil suit between the parties concerning the same dispute, which the respondent had failed to disclose. The court concluded that the respondent's attempt to use the criminal proceedings as a tool of harassment against the appellants amounted to an abuse of the process of the court.

Supreme court stated, "Power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to be exercised sparingly and only in rare cases where it is evident that refusal to exercise such power would result in an abuse of the process of law." The court further added, "The factual position reveals that the genesis and purpose of the criminal proceedings are nothing but the said incident, and the dispute involved is essentially of civil nature."

The Supreme Court's decision highlights the importance of carefully examining the allegations in an FIR and ensuring that they meet the necessary requirements to constitute the alleged offenses. It also emphasizes the need to prevent the misuse of criminal proceedings as a means of harassment.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the judiciary's responsibility to safeguard the principles of justice and protect individuals from malicious or baseless allegations. By quashing the FIR and all further proceedings against the appellants, the Supreme Court has upheld the integrity of the legal system and reaffirmed the importance of fair and just adjudication.

Date of Decision: January 30, 2023

Usha Chakraborty & Anr.  vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Latest Legal News