Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Ongoing Investigation - Abuse of Process of Law

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has quashed an FIR (First Information Report) and ongoing investigation against the appellants, emphasizing the need to prevent the abuse of the legal process. The apex court held that the power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) to quash FIRs should be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases where the refusal to do so may result in an abuse of the process of law.

The bench comprising of Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice C.T. Ravikumar observed that the allegations in the FIR were vague and did not contain the essential ingredients to constitute the alleged offenses. Furthermore, the court noted the existence of a pending civil suit between the parties concerning the same dispute, which the respondent had failed to disclose. The court concluded that the respondent's attempt to use the criminal proceedings as a tool of harassment against the appellants amounted to an abuse of the process of the court.

Supreme court stated, "Power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to be exercised sparingly and only in rare cases where it is evident that refusal to exercise such power would result in an abuse of the process of law." The court further added, "The factual position reveals that the genesis and purpose of the criminal proceedings are nothing but the said incident, and the dispute involved is essentially of civil nature."

The Supreme Court's decision highlights the importance of carefully examining the allegations in an FIR and ensuring that they meet the necessary requirements to constitute the alleged offenses. It also emphasizes the need to prevent the misuse of criminal proceedings as a means of harassment.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the judiciary's responsibility to safeguard the principles of justice and protect individuals from malicious or baseless allegations. By quashing the FIR and all further proceedings against the appellants, the Supreme Court has upheld the integrity of the legal system and reaffirmed the importance of fair and just adjudication.

Date of Decision: January 30, 2023

Usha Chakraborty & Anr.  vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Latest Legal News