Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Modifies Maintenance Order: Appellant Concealed Compensation Receipts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has modified a maintenance order in a case involving maintenance granted to a wife and son. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal on September 22, 2023, addressed the appellant's challenge to the High Court's modification of the maintenance order.

The High Court had altered the maintenance order to make it payable from the date of the application for maintenance, a decision contested by the appellant. The appellant argued that the maintenance granted was excessive, and there were concerns regarding the starting date for payment.

During the proceedings, it was revealed that the appellant had concealed compensation amounts received by him, significantly impacting the assessment of maintenance. Compensation amounts of Rs. 42,20,202/- and Rs. 11,36,861/- were received by the appellant due to the acquisition of his property. Furthermore, an affidavit filed by the appellant disclosed that he had received a total compensation of Rs. 82,33,531/- between January 2003 and June 2012.

In light of this concealed information, the Supreme Court ordered that the maintenance payable by the appellant from July 1, 2012, should be at the rate of Rs. 45,000/- per month, as per the Family Court's order dated November 19, 2018. However, for the period from the date of filing the application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) until June 30, 2022, the total amount payable by the appellant to the respondent No. 1-wife and child shall be at the rate of Rs. 25,000/- per month.

The judgment concluded by specifying that the arrears as of the date of the judgment shall be paid by the appellant to the respondent No. 1-wife within a three-month period, with adjustments made for amounts previously paid by the appellant, including a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs paid pursuant to a previous order.

This judgment highlights the importance of full and honest disclosure of financial information in maintenance cases and serves as a significant legal precedent in matters of maintenance modification.

Date of Decision: September 22, 2023

DHIRENDER KUMAR vs BALA & ANR.     

 

Latest Legal News