Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Modifies Maintenance Order: Appellant Concealed Compensation Receipts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has modified a maintenance order in a case involving maintenance granted to a wife and son. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal on September 22, 2023, addressed the appellant's challenge to the High Court's modification of the maintenance order.

The High Court had altered the maintenance order to make it payable from the date of the application for maintenance, a decision contested by the appellant. The appellant argued that the maintenance granted was excessive, and there were concerns regarding the starting date for payment.

During the proceedings, it was revealed that the appellant had concealed compensation amounts received by him, significantly impacting the assessment of maintenance. Compensation amounts of Rs. 42,20,202/- and Rs. 11,36,861/- were received by the appellant due to the acquisition of his property. Furthermore, an affidavit filed by the appellant disclosed that he had received a total compensation of Rs. 82,33,531/- between January 2003 and June 2012.

In light of this concealed information, the Supreme Court ordered that the maintenance payable by the appellant from July 1, 2012, should be at the rate of Rs. 45,000/- per month, as per the Family Court's order dated November 19, 2018. However, for the period from the date of filing the application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) until June 30, 2022, the total amount payable by the appellant to the respondent No. 1-wife and child shall be at the rate of Rs. 25,000/- per month.

The judgment concluded by specifying that the arrears as of the date of the judgment shall be paid by the appellant to the respondent No. 1-wife within a three-month period, with adjustments made for amounts previously paid by the appellant, including a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs paid pursuant to a previous order.

This judgment highlights the importance of full and honest disclosure of financial information in maintenance cases and serves as a significant legal precedent in matters of maintenance modification.

Date of Decision: September 22, 2023

DHIRENDER KUMAR vs BALA & ANR.     

 

Latest Legal News