Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Supreme Court Invokes Art. 142 to End Non-Ending Litigation in Labor Case – Directed To Pay Rs 10 Lakh lumpsum

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India invoked its "Extraordinary Jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India" to resolve a protracted labor dispute case. The apex court passed the order in a civil appeal between Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Limited (Appellant) and Vasant Kisanrao Deshpande & Others (Respondents).

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal presided over the case, expressing concern over the "classic case which shows that Judicial delays lead to a situation where this Court is compelled to find a solution."

The case involved the dismissal of service of the first respondent, Vasant Kisanrao Deshpande, in June 2001. Deshpande had filed a complaint before the Labour Court at Aurangabad, which led to a 14-year-long judicial battle. The Labour Court had initially ordered his reinstatement with back wages. Further appeals and revisions led to an order of remand from the Industrial Court and subsequent confirmation by the High Court.

Adding a layer of complexity, the court noted that Deshpande had reached the age of superannuation in December 2006. The justices found it "very difficult to imagine when the main litigation...will come to an end" and noted the burden of ongoing litigation costs on both parties.

In a move to put "an end to the non-ending litigation," the bench exercised its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. It directed the appellant company to pay a lump sum of Rs. 10,00,000 (Rupees ten lakhs) to Deshpande within a period of two months.

The decision has been hailed as a pragmatic approach to tackle judicial delays and pendency, with the court taking a decisive stand to close a case that had dragged on for over two decades. This judgment is expected to set a precedent for similar cases mired in judicial backlog.

Date of Decision: October 20, 2023

MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED vs VASANT KISANRAO DESHPANDE & ORS.

Similar News