CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness

Supreme Court Invokes Art. 142 to End Non-Ending Litigation in Labor Case – Directed To Pay Rs 10 Lakh lumpsum

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India invoked its "Extraordinary Jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India" to resolve a protracted labor dispute case. The apex court passed the order in a civil appeal between Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Limited (Appellant) and Vasant Kisanrao Deshpande & Others (Respondents).

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal presided over the case, expressing concern over the "classic case which shows that Judicial delays lead to a situation where this Court is compelled to find a solution."

The case involved the dismissal of service of the first respondent, Vasant Kisanrao Deshpande, in June 2001. Deshpande had filed a complaint before the Labour Court at Aurangabad, which led to a 14-year-long judicial battle. The Labour Court had initially ordered his reinstatement with back wages. Further appeals and revisions led to an order of remand from the Industrial Court and subsequent confirmation by the High Court.

Adding a layer of complexity, the court noted that Deshpande had reached the age of superannuation in December 2006. The justices found it "very difficult to imagine when the main litigation...will come to an end" and noted the burden of ongoing litigation costs on both parties.

In a move to put "an end to the non-ending litigation," the bench exercised its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. It directed the appellant company to pay a lump sum of Rs. 10,00,000 (Rupees ten lakhs) to Deshpande within a period of two months.

The decision has been hailed as a pragmatic approach to tackle judicial delays and pendency, with the court taking a decisive stand to close a case that had dragged on for over two decades. This judgment is expected to set a precedent for similar cases mired in judicial backlog.

Date of Decision: October 20, 2023

MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED vs VASANT KISANRAO DESHPANDE & ORS.

Latest Legal News