Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Holds Unrecognized Law College Graduates Ineligible for Enrollment as Advocates

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: June 9, 2023

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India held that graduates from unapproved law colleges are ineligible for enrollment as advocates. The judgment was delivered by Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Vikram Nath, who stated that the Bar Council of India (BCI) has the authority to prescribe enrollment norms.

The case, titled Bar Council of India vs. Rabi Sahu & Anr., arose from an appeal filed by the BCI against an order of the Orissa High Court directing the enrollment of a writ petitioner as an advocate. The Supreme Court had stayed the operation of the high court order during the appeal process.

Justice Sanjay Kumar, while delivering the judgment, observed, "The rule framed by BCI requiring a candidate for enrollment as an Advocate to have completed his law course from a college recognized/approved by BCI cannot be said to be invalid." The court emphasized that the BCI's role in the enrollment process cannot be undermined, contrary to the previous judgment in V. Sudeer vs. Bar Council of India.

The writ petitioner had obtained a law degree from Vivekananda Law College, Angul, which was not recognized or approved by the BCI. The BCI had previously issued directives to the college, explicitly stating that students admitted there would not be eligible for enrollment as advocates. Consequently, the Orissa State Bar Council rejected the writ petitioner's application for enrollment.

The Division Bench of the Orissa High Court had allowed the writ petition, relying on the now-invalidated judgment in V. Sudeer vs. Bar Council of India. However, a recent Constitution Bench judgment in Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi Law College & Ors. clarified that the BCI has the power to determine the norms for enrollment.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court emphasized, "We have no hesitation in holding that the Division Bench was not justified in directing the enrollment of respondent No. 1 as an Advocate, despite the fact that he secured his law degree from a college which was not recognized or approved by BCI." The appeal was allowed, setting aside the order of the Orissa High Court.

This judgment highlights the importance of obtaining a law degree from a BCI-recognized or approved college for individuals aspiring to practice as advocates. It reinforces the role of the BCI in determining the eligibility criteria for enrollment, ensuring the maintenance of standards within the legal profession.

Date of Decision: June 9, 2023

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA  vs RABI SAHU & ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/9-June-23-BCI-vs-Rabi-Sahu.pdf"]

Latest Legal News