Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Holds Unrecognized Law College Graduates Ineligible for Enrollment as Advocates

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: June 9, 2023

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India held that graduates from unapproved law colleges are ineligible for enrollment as advocates. The judgment was delivered by Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Vikram Nath, who stated that the Bar Council of India (BCI) has the authority to prescribe enrollment norms.

The case, titled Bar Council of India vs. Rabi Sahu & Anr., arose from an appeal filed by the BCI against an order of the Orissa High Court directing the enrollment of a writ petitioner as an advocate. The Supreme Court had stayed the operation of the high court order during the appeal process.

Justice Sanjay Kumar, while delivering the judgment, observed, "The rule framed by BCI requiring a candidate for enrollment as an Advocate to have completed his law course from a college recognized/approved by BCI cannot be said to be invalid." The court emphasized that the BCI's role in the enrollment process cannot be undermined, contrary to the previous judgment in V. Sudeer vs. Bar Council of India.

The writ petitioner had obtained a law degree from Vivekananda Law College, Angul, which was not recognized or approved by the BCI. The BCI had previously issued directives to the college, explicitly stating that students admitted there would not be eligible for enrollment as advocates. Consequently, the Orissa State Bar Council rejected the writ petitioner's application for enrollment.

The Division Bench of the Orissa High Court had allowed the writ petition, relying on the now-invalidated judgment in V. Sudeer vs. Bar Council of India. However, a recent Constitution Bench judgment in Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi Law College & Ors. clarified that the BCI has the power to determine the norms for enrollment.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court emphasized, "We have no hesitation in holding that the Division Bench was not justified in directing the enrollment of respondent No. 1 as an Advocate, despite the fact that he secured his law degree from a college which was not recognized or approved by BCI." The appeal was allowed, setting aside the order of the Orissa High Court.

This judgment highlights the importance of obtaining a law degree from a BCI-recognized or approved college for individuals aspiring to practice as advocates. It reinforces the role of the BCI in determining the eligibility criteria for enrollment, ensuring the maintenance of standards within the legal profession.

Date of Decision: June 9, 2023

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA  vs RABI SAHU & ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/9-June-23-BCI-vs-Rabi-Sahu.pdf"]

Latest Legal News