Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Supreme Court Holds Unrecognized Law College Graduates Ineligible for Enrollment as Advocates

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: June 9, 2023

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India held that graduates from unapproved law colleges are ineligible for enrollment as advocates. The judgment was delivered by Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Vikram Nath, who stated that the Bar Council of India (BCI) has the authority to prescribe enrollment norms.

The case, titled Bar Council of India vs. Rabi Sahu & Anr., arose from an appeal filed by the BCI against an order of the Orissa High Court directing the enrollment of a writ petitioner as an advocate. The Supreme Court had stayed the operation of the high court order during the appeal process.

Justice Sanjay Kumar, while delivering the judgment, observed, "The rule framed by BCI requiring a candidate for enrollment as an Advocate to have completed his law course from a college recognized/approved by BCI cannot be said to be invalid." The court emphasized that the BCI's role in the enrollment process cannot be undermined, contrary to the previous judgment in V. Sudeer vs. Bar Council of India.

The writ petitioner had obtained a law degree from Vivekananda Law College, Angul, which was not recognized or approved by the BCI. The BCI had previously issued directives to the college, explicitly stating that students admitted there would not be eligible for enrollment as advocates. Consequently, the Orissa State Bar Council rejected the writ petitioner's application for enrollment.

The Division Bench of the Orissa High Court had allowed the writ petition, relying on the now-invalidated judgment in V. Sudeer vs. Bar Council of India. However, a recent Constitution Bench judgment in Bar Council of India vs. Bonnie Foi Law College & Ors. clarified that the BCI has the power to determine the norms for enrollment.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court emphasized, "We have no hesitation in holding that the Division Bench was not justified in directing the enrollment of respondent No. 1 as an Advocate, despite the fact that he secured his law degree from a college which was not recognized or approved by BCI." The appeal was allowed, setting aside the order of the Orissa High Court.

This judgment highlights the importance of obtaining a law degree from a BCI-recognized or approved college for individuals aspiring to practice as advocates. It reinforces the role of the BCI in determining the eligibility criteria for enrollment, ensuring the maintenance of standards within the legal profession.

Date of Decision: June 9, 2023

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA  vs RABI SAHU & ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/9-June-23-BCI-vs-Rabi-Sahu.pdf"]

Latest Legal News