Kerala High Court Denies Relief To Petitioner Suppressing Facts, Orders Enquiry Into Allotment Of Govt Scheme Houses On Puramboke Land Candidate Missing Physical Test For Minor Illness Has No Enforceable Right To Rescheduling: Supreme Court Prolonged Incarceration And Parity Constitute Valid Grounds For Regular Bail: Supreme Court Accused In Cheque Bounce Cases Cannot File Evidence-In-Chief By Affidavit Under Section 145 NI Act: Orissa High Court Borrowers Have No Right To Personal Hearing Before Fraud Classification, But Full Forensic Audit Report Must Be Supplied: Supreme Court Pendency Of Matrimonial Dispute With General Allegations Not A Valid Ground To Deny Public Employment: Allahabad High Court Minimum Five Persons Mandatory To Prove 'Preparation For Dacoity' Under Section 399 IPC: Gujarat High Court Suit For Specific Performance Not Maintainable Without Prayer To Set Aside Termination Of Agreement: Madras High Court Trial Court Must Indicate Material Forming Basis Of Charge, Mechanical Framing Of Charges Impermissible: Madhya Pradesh High Court Gated Community Association Cannot Exclude LIG/EWS Allottees, Single Unified Society Mandatory: Telangana High Court Voluntary Retirement Deemed Accepted If Positive Order Of Refusal Is Not Communicated Within Notice Period: Supreme Court Court Cannot Convict One Accused And Acquit Another On Same Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Due To Unreliable Last-Seen Evidence And Principle Of Parity 138 NI Act | Accused Cannot Rebut Presumption Of Legally Enforceable Debt At Pre-Trial Stage In Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court More Meritorious PWD Candidates From Reserved Categories Can Claim Unreserved PWD Posts In Open Competition: Supreme Court Meritorious Reserved Candidates Can Claim Unreserved Horizontal Vacancies Based On Merit: Supreme Court Employee Not Entitled To Gratuity Until Conclusion Of Both Departmental And Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Stamp Duty Recovery Against Legal Heirs Is Strictly Limited To The Extent Of Inherited Estate: Allahabad High Court Single Lathi Blow On Head During Sudden Altercation Amounts To Culpable Homicide Under Section 304 Part II IPC, Not Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Habeas Corpus Maintainable For Child Custody Against Father; Cannot Be Dismissed Merely Due To Alternate Remedy: Allahabad High Court "Plea Of Ignorance In Digital Era Inexcusable": Punjab & Haryana HC Imposes Rs 10K Cost On Accused For Hiding Prior Bail Dismissal Discrepancies In Name And Age On Monthly Pass Fail To Establish 'Bona Fide Passenger' Status In Railway Accident Claim: Delhi High Court "Last Seen" Theory A Weak Link If Time Gap Is Wide: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life For Murder Failure To Conduct Pre-Anaesthetic Check-Up Prima Facie Amounts To Gross Medical Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Kerala High Court Gujarat High Court Bans AI From Judicial Decision-Making, Lays Down Strict Policy for Court Use of Artificial Intelligence NHAI Cannot Allege Corruption In Land Acquisition Awards While Simultaneously Compromising Them: Bombay High Court State Must Prove Land Acquisition, Citizen Cannot Be Forced To Prove A Negative Fact: Calcutta High Court Seriousness Of Offence Or Age No Bar For Juvenile's Bail Under Section 12 JJ Act: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail To 14-Year-Old Suppression Of Material Facts Must Be Palpable And Ex Facie To Vacate Ex Parte Injunction Under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC: Calcutta High Court Pendency Of Criminal Case At FIR Stage Is No Bar To Issuance Or Renewal Of Passport: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Supreme Court Holds Last Panchnama Date as Relevant for Time Limitation in Block Assessment Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that the date of the last Panchnama drawn during a search operation is the relevant starting point for the two-year limitation period in block assessment proceedings. The judgment, delivered by Justice M.R. Shah on March 24, 2023, resolves the dispute regarding the computation of the limitation period under Section 158BE of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Court emphasized that the block assessment proceedings are based on the material collected during the search and the corresponding Panchnama. Rejecting the argument that the last authorization date should be considered, Justice Shah stated, "The date of the Panchnama last drawn can be said to be the relevant date and can be said to be the starting point of limitation of two years for completing the block assessment proceedings." The interpretation aligns with the purpose and intent of Explanation 2 to Section 158BE of the Act.

The case, titled "Anil Minda and Others vs. Commissioner of Income Tax," revolved around appeals against a Delhi High Court judgment that had allowed the Revenue's appeals and set aside the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessees contended that the assessments were time-barred as they were not completed within two years from the end of the month in which the last authorization for search was issued.

The Supreme Court's decision reaffirms the significance of the Panchnama in determining the limitation period for block assessments. By considering the date of the last Panchnama drawn as the starting point, the Court ensures that the assessment proceedings are conducted based on the entire material collected during the search.

This ruling provides clarity and guidance to taxpayers and tax authorities regarding the time limitation for block assessment proceedings. It also emphasizes the importance of accurate documentation and proper record-keeping during search operations.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

Anil Minda and Others VS Commissioner of Income Tax

Latest Legal News