Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Holds Last Panchnama Date as Relevant for Time Limitation in Block Assessment Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that the date of the last Panchnama drawn during a search operation is the relevant starting point for the two-year limitation period in block assessment proceedings. The judgment, delivered by Justice M.R. Shah on March 24, 2023, resolves the dispute regarding the computation of the limitation period under Section 158BE of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Court emphasized that the block assessment proceedings are based on the material collected during the search and the corresponding Panchnama. Rejecting the argument that the last authorization date should be considered, Justice Shah stated, "The date of the Panchnama last drawn can be said to be the relevant date and can be said to be the starting point of limitation of two years for completing the block assessment proceedings." The interpretation aligns with the purpose and intent of Explanation 2 to Section 158BE of the Act.

The case, titled "Anil Minda and Others vs. Commissioner of Income Tax," revolved around appeals against a Delhi High Court judgment that had allowed the Revenue's appeals and set aside the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessees contended that the assessments were time-barred as they were not completed within two years from the end of the month in which the last authorization for search was issued.

The Supreme Court's decision reaffirms the significance of the Panchnama in determining the limitation period for block assessments. By considering the date of the last Panchnama drawn as the starting point, the Court ensures that the assessment proceedings are conducted based on the entire material collected during the search.

This ruling provides clarity and guidance to taxpayers and tax authorities regarding the time limitation for block assessment proceedings. It also emphasizes the importance of accurate documentation and proper record-keeping during search operations.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

Anil Minda and Others VS Commissioner of Income Tax

Latest Legal News