Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Holds Last Panchnama Date as Relevant for Time Limitation in Block Assessment Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that the date of the last Panchnama drawn during a search operation is the relevant starting point for the two-year limitation period in block assessment proceedings. The judgment, delivered by Justice M.R. Shah on March 24, 2023, resolves the dispute regarding the computation of the limitation period under Section 158BE of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Court emphasized that the block assessment proceedings are based on the material collected during the search and the corresponding Panchnama. Rejecting the argument that the last authorization date should be considered, Justice Shah stated, "The date of the Panchnama last drawn can be said to be the relevant date and can be said to be the starting point of limitation of two years for completing the block assessment proceedings." The interpretation aligns with the purpose and intent of Explanation 2 to Section 158BE of the Act.

The case, titled "Anil Minda and Others vs. Commissioner of Income Tax," revolved around appeals against a Delhi High Court judgment that had allowed the Revenue's appeals and set aside the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessees contended that the assessments were time-barred as they were not completed within two years from the end of the month in which the last authorization for search was issued.

The Supreme Court's decision reaffirms the significance of the Panchnama in determining the limitation period for block assessments. By considering the date of the last Panchnama drawn as the starting point, the Court ensures that the assessment proceedings are conducted based on the entire material collected during the search.

This ruling provides clarity and guidance to taxpayers and tax authorities regarding the time limitation for block assessment proceedings. It also emphasizes the importance of accurate documentation and proper record-keeping during search operations.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

Anil Minda and Others VS Commissioner of Income Tax

Latest Legal News