Kerala High Court Denies Relief To Petitioner Suppressing Facts, Orders Enquiry Into Allotment Of Govt Scheme Houses On Puramboke Land Candidate Missing Physical Test For Minor Illness Has No Enforceable Right To Rescheduling: Supreme Court Prolonged Incarceration And Parity Constitute Valid Grounds For Regular Bail: Supreme Court Accused In Cheque Bounce Cases Cannot File Evidence-In-Chief By Affidavit Under Section 145 NI Act: Orissa High Court Borrowers Have No Right To Personal Hearing Before Fraud Classification, But Full Forensic Audit Report Must Be Supplied: Supreme Court Pendency Of Matrimonial Dispute With General Allegations Not A Valid Ground To Deny Public Employment: Allahabad High Court Minimum Five Persons Mandatory To Prove 'Preparation For Dacoity' Under Section 399 IPC: Gujarat High Court Suit For Specific Performance Not Maintainable Without Prayer To Set Aside Termination Of Agreement: Madras High Court Trial Court Must Indicate Material Forming Basis Of Charge, Mechanical Framing Of Charges Impermissible: Madhya Pradesh High Court Gated Community Association Cannot Exclude LIG/EWS Allottees, Single Unified Society Mandatory: Telangana High Court Voluntary Retirement Deemed Accepted If Positive Order Of Refusal Is Not Communicated Within Notice Period: Supreme Court Court Cannot Convict One Accused And Acquit Another On Same Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Due To Unreliable Last-Seen Evidence And Principle Of Parity 138 NI Act | Accused Cannot Rebut Presumption Of Legally Enforceable Debt At Pre-Trial Stage In Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court More Meritorious PWD Candidates From Reserved Categories Can Claim Unreserved PWD Posts In Open Competition: Supreme Court Meritorious Reserved Candidates Can Claim Unreserved Horizontal Vacancies Based On Merit: Supreme Court Employee Not Entitled To Gratuity Until Conclusion Of Both Departmental And Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Stamp Duty Recovery Against Legal Heirs Is Strictly Limited To The Extent Of Inherited Estate: Allahabad High Court Single Lathi Blow On Head During Sudden Altercation Amounts To Culpable Homicide Under Section 304 Part II IPC, Not Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Habeas Corpus Maintainable For Child Custody Against Father; Cannot Be Dismissed Merely Due To Alternate Remedy: Allahabad High Court "Plea Of Ignorance In Digital Era Inexcusable": Punjab & Haryana HC Imposes Rs 10K Cost On Accused For Hiding Prior Bail Dismissal Discrepancies In Name And Age On Monthly Pass Fail To Establish 'Bona Fide Passenger' Status In Railway Accident Claim: Delhi High Court "Last Seen" Theory A Weak Link If Time Gap Is Wide: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life For Murder Failure To Conduct Pre-Anaesthetic Check-Up Prima Facie Amounts To Gross Medical Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Kerala High Court Gujarat High Court Bans AI From Judicial Decision-Making, Lays Down Strict Policy for Court Use of Artificial Intelligence NHAI Cannot Allege Corruption In Land Acquisition Awards While Simultaneously Compromising Them: Bombay High Court State Must Prove Land Acquisition, Citizen Cannot Be Forced To Prove A Negative Fact: Calcutta High Court Seriousness Of Offence Or Age No Bar For Juvenile's Bail Under Section 12 JJ Act: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail To 14-Year-Old Suppression Of Material Facts Must Be Palpable And Ex Facie To Vacate Ex Parte Injunction Under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC: Calcutta High Court Pendency Of Criminal Case At FIR Stage Is No Bar To Issuance Or Renewal Of Passport: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Supreme Court Grants Relief to Company Unable to Deposit Settlement Amount during Insolvency Moratorium

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has granted relief to M/s. Shekhar Resorts Limited, a hospitality services company, after it was unable to deposit the settlement amount under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 during an insolvency moratorium. The Court emphasized that no person should be left remediless and highlighted the impossibility of the appellant making the payment due to the legal impediment caused by the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). "No person should be left remediless, and the Court cannot compel a person to do something impossible."

The appellant company had approached the High Court seeking directions to consider its case under the Scheme of 2019. However, the High Court dismissed the petition, stating that it could not issue a direction contrary to the Scheme and that the Designated Committee, responsible for processing applications under the Scheme, no longer existed.

Justice M.R. Shah, delivering the judgment, observed, "The appellant cannot be punished for not doing something which was impossible for it to do... No person should be left remediless, and the Court cannot compel a person to do something impossible." The Court acknowledged the legal disability faced by the appellant during the moratorium, which prohibited any payments, and emphasized that the inability to deposit the settlement amount should not render the appellant remediless.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court noted that even after the expiry of the Scheme, the Designated Committees continued to function manually in cases where courts set aside rejections after the Scheme period. It also mentioned circulars issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), allowing for manual processing of declarations under the Scheme in such cases.

Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashed the High Court's judgment, and directed the appropriation of the payment already deposited by the appellant towards the settlement dues under the Scheme of 2019. The appellant will also be issued a discharge certificate.

This judgment highlights the Court's commitment to ensuring that individuals and entities facing legal impediments are not unfairly penalized and provides clarity on the application of the Scheme in cases involving insolvency moratoriums.

Date of Decision: January 5, 2023

M/s. Shekhar Resorts Limited vs Union of India & Ors.

Latest Legal News